• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Effects of a Dysphagia Nursing Protocol on Reducing Aspiration Pneumonia and Improving Daily Activity Dependency in Patients with Acute Stroke

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2015;27(3):304-313.
Published online: June 30, 2015

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Han, Jung-Hee Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-6559, Fax: +82-2-474-4691, E-mail: hee972@naver.com
• Received: March 23, 2015   • Accepted: June 11, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 38 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 1 Crossref
  • 2 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is the major complication of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke. Nursing management for dysphagia influences on patients’ health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the effects of Dysphagia Nursing Protocol (DNP) for patients with acute stroke. We aimed to examine the incidence of AP and the dependency rate at the discharge.
  • Methods
    We used a non-equivalent control group posttest only design in this study. DNP was developed with content validity index > 0.75 in all items. This protocol was composed of the evaluation, education, complication prevention, and checking phases. After training the staff nurses, we applied DNP protocol to the experimental group. The control group was enrolled from June to August 2013 (n=80), and the experimental group was June to August 2014 (n=64).
  • Results
    The incidence of AP was 16.3% in control group while 4.7% in experimental group (p=.028), and the Odds Ratio (OR) was 0.26 (p=.045). The dependency ratio was 66.3% in control group while 43.8% in experimental group (p=.011), and the OR was 0.33 (p=.011).
  • Conclusion
    DNP was beneficial for the reducing the risk of AP and the improved the functional status.
Figure 1.
Dysphagia nursing protocol.
kjan-27-304f1.jpg
Table 1.
Research Design of the Study
Groups Pretest Treatment Posttest
Exp.   X O2
Cont.     O2

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; X=dysphagia nursing protocol; O2=Baseline characteristics, incidence of aspiration pneumonia, discharged modified ranken scale, dependency ratio.

Table 2.
The Demographic and Disease-related Characteristics at Baseline (N=144)
Characteristics Categories Cont. (n=80) Exp. (n=64) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year)   69.26±12.44 65.92±16.21 1.40 .163
Gender Male 45 (56.3) 34 (53.2) 0.62 .575
Smoking Never smoker 55 (69.0) 43 (67.0) 0.42 .811
Ex-smoker 8 (10.0) 5 (8.0)
Smoker 17 (21.0) 16 (25.0)
Initial NIHSS   7.78±5.32 6.75±4.53 1.26 .136
Initial MRS 0 0 (0.0) 1 (1.6) 4.61 .465
1 4 (5.0) 7 (10.9)
2 12 (15.0) 7 (10.9)
3 14 (17.5) 15 (23.4)
4 37 (46.3) 24 (37.5)
5 13 (16.3) 10 (15.6)
TOAST LAD 29 (36.3) 14 (21.9) 5.49 .240
SVD 9 (11.3) 13 (20.3)
CE 21 (26.3) 15 (23.4)
Undertermined 9 (11.3) 11 (17.2)
Others 12 (15.0) 11 (17.2)
Days of keeping dysphagia diet/tube feeding 10.14±6.80 8.77±5.10 1.34 .271
Discharge status Home 28 (34.9) 21 (32.8) 2.33 .675
Rehabilitation unit 33 (41.3) 24 (37.5)
Other hospitals 19 (23.8) 19 (29.7)
Length of stay   10.75±6.70 8.97±5.15 2.33 .278

NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; MRS=modified ranken scale; TOAST=trials of org 10172 in acute stroke; LAD=large artery disease; SVD=small vessel disease; CE=cardiac embolism.

Table 3.
Outcome Analysis (N=144)
Variables Categories Cont. (n=80) Exp. (n=64) x2 or t p Predictors Adjusted OR (95% CI) p
n (%) or n (%) or
M±SD M±SD
Incidence of aspiration pneumonia 13 (16.3) 3 (4.7) 4.81 .028 DNP 0.26 (0.67~0.97) .045
Discharged MRS 0 5 (6.3) 16 (25.0) 19.32 .002  
1 12 (15.0) 14 (2.9)  
2 10 (12.5) 6 (9.4)
3 18 (22.5) 7 (10.9)
4 21 (26.3) 19 (29.7)
5 14 (18.0) 2 (3.1)
Dependency ratio (=MRS 3~5) 53 (66.3) 28 (43.8) 7.31 .011 DNP 0.33 (0.14~0.78) .011
            Initial NIHSS 1.18 (1.05~1.32) .007

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; MRS=modified ranken scale; NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; DNP=dysphagia nursing protocol;

Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial NIHSS, initial MRS, TOAST;

Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial MRS, TOAST.

  • 1.Lee KBPrognosis of stroke. In: Joe KH. editor..Text book of stroke. Seoul: E-public; 2009. p. 57-63.
  • 2.Hong KS, Kang DW, Koo JS, Yu KH, Han MK, Cho YJ, et al. Impact of neurological and medical complications on 3-month outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. European Journal of Neurology. 2008;15(12):1324-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02310.x.
  • 3.Ickenstein GW, Hohlig C, Prosiegel M, Koch H, Dziewas R, Bodechtel U, et al. Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal of National Stroke Association. 2012;21(7):569-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.01.004.
  • 4.Finlayson O, Kapral M, Hall R, Asllani E, Selchen D, Saposnik G. Risk factors, inpatient care, and outcomes of pneumonia after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2011;77(14):1338-45.
  • 5.Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Tea-sell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb.
  • 6.Chang CY, Cheng TJ, Lin CY, Chen JY, Lu TH, Kawachi I. Reporting of aspiration pneumonia or choking as a cause of death in patients who died with stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:1182-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000663.
  • 7.Martino R, Pron G, Diamant N. Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: insufficient evidence for guidelines. Dysphagia. 2000;15(1):19-30.
  • 8.Middleton S, McElduff P, Ward J, Grimshaw JM, Dale S, D'Este C, et al. Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke(QASC): a cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1699-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61485-2.
  • 9.Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Definition of index of evaluation to acute stroke 2013 [Internet]. Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; 2013. [cited 2014 December, 15]. Available from:.http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA020002000000&cmsurl=/cms/notice/01/1316208_24974.html&subject=2013%eb%85%84%285%ec%b0%a8%29+%ea%b8%89%ec%84%b1%ea%b8%b0+%eb%87%8c%ec%a1%b8%ec%a4%91+%ed%8f%89%ea%b0%80+%ec%a1%b0%ec%82%ac%ed%91%9c+%ec%88%98%ec%a0%95+%eb%b0%8f+%eb%a0%88%ec%9d%b4%ec%95%84%ec%9b%83+%eb%93%b1+%ec%95%88%eb%82%b4#none.
  • 10.O'Donoghue S, Bagnall A. Videofluoroscopic evaluation in the assessment of swallowing disorders in paediatric and adult populations. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 1999;51:158-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000021494.
  • 11.Reynolds PS, Gilbert L, Good DC, Knappertz VA, Crenshaw C, Wayne SL, et al. Pneumonia in dysphagic stroke patients: effect on outcomes and identification of high risk patients. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair. 1998;12(1):15-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154596839801200103.
  • 12.Song YA, Beom JH, Ham YS, Kim SH. Development and evaluation of a dysphagia nursing intervention program for patients with a stroke. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2011;17(3):340-8.
  • 13.Hines S, Wallace K, Crowe L, Finlayson K, Chang A, Pattie M. Identification and nursing management of dysphagia in individuals with acute neurological impairment (update). Interventional Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare. 2011;9(2):148-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00211.x.
  • 14.Shaker R, Geenen JE. Management of dysphagia in stroke patients. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2011;7(5):308-32.
  • 15.Titsworth WL, Abram J, Fullerton A, Hester J, Guin P, Waters MF, et al. Prospective quality initiative to maximize dysphagia screening reduces hospital-acquired pneumonia prevalence in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:3154-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000204.
  • 16.Daniels SK, Anderson JA, Willson PC. Valid items for screening dysphagia risk in patients with stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2012;43(3):892-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640946.
  • 17.Foley N, Teasell R, Salter K, Kruger E, Martino R. Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Age and Ageing. 2008;37(3):258-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afn064.
  • 18.Lee EH, Choi JY. Development and utilization of assessment and intervention checklist for post-stroke dysphagia. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013;25(2):113-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.2.113.
  • 19.Barnard SL. Nursing dysphagia screening for acute stroke patients in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2011;37(1):64-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2010.11.002.
  • 20.Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S. Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke. 2005;36(9):1972-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000177529.86868.8d.
  • 21.Yoo SH, Kim SS. Development and evaluation of and enteral nutrition protocol for dysphagia in patients with acute stroke. Journal of Korean Academic Nursing. 2014;44(3):280-93.
  • 22.Cichero J, Steele C, Duivestein J, Clave P, Chen J, Kayashita J, et al. The need for international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened liquids used in dysphagia management: foundations of a global initiative. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2013;1:280-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z.
  • 23.Ickenstein GW, Höhlig C, Prosiegel M, Koch H, Dziewas R, Bodechtel U, et al. Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease. 2012;21(7):569-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.01.004.
  • 24.van Sweiten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604-7.
  • 25.Taylor BJQuantitative research design, In; Taylor BJ, Ker-mode S, Roberts KL. editors. Research in nursing and health care-evidence for practice. Australia: Thomson; 2006. p. 190-1.
  • 26.Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller JEA. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864-70.
  • 27.Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35-41.
  • 28.Paek EKAspiration indicators in post-stroke dysphagia [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2006.
  • 29.Lin LC, Wang SC, Chen SH, Wang TG, Chen MY, Wu SC. Efficacy of swallowing training for residents following stroke. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;44(5):469-78.
  • 30.Lakshminarayan K, Tsa AW, Tong X, Vazquez G, Peacock JM, George MG, et al. Utility of dysphagia screening results in predicting poststroke pneumonia. Stroke. 2014;41:2849-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597039.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Dysphagia and daily oral fluids among cerebrovascular stroke patients: an theory-based nursing intervention protocol
      Zeinab Hussein Ali, Marwa Abd-Elaziz, Amany Abdrbo
      Frontiers of Nursing.2023; 10(2): 213.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Effects of a Dysphagia Nursing Protocol on Reducing Aspiration Pneumonia and Improving Daily Activity Dependency in Patients with Acute Stroke
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015;27(3):304-313.   Published online June 30, 2015
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Effects of a Dysphagia Nursing Protocol on Reducing Aspiration Pneumonia and Improving Daily Activity Dependency in Patients with Acute Stroke
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015;27(3):304-313.   Published online June 30, 2015
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    Effects of a Dysphagia Nursing Protocol on Reducing Aspiration Pneumonia and Improving Daily Activity Dependency in Patients with Acute Stroke
    Image
    Figure 1. Dysphagia nursing protocol.
    Effects of a Dysphagia Nursing Protocol on Reducing Aspiration Pneumonia and Improving Daily Activity Dependency in Patients with Acute Stroke

    Research Design of the Study

    Groups Pretest Treatment Posttest
    Exp.   X O2
    Cont.     O2

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; X=dysphagia nursing protocol; O2=Baseline characteristics, incidence of aspiration pneumonia, discharged modified ranken scale, dependency ratio.

    The Demographic and Disease-related Characteristics at Baseline (N=144)

    Characteristics Categories Cont. (n=80) Exp. (n=64) x2 or t p
    n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
    Age (year)   69.26±12.44 65.92±16.21 1.40 .163
    Gender Male 45 (56.3) 34 (53.2) 0.62 .575
    Smoking Never smoker 55 (69.0) 43 (67.0) 0.42 .811
    Ex-smoker 8 (10.0) 5 (8.0)
    Smoker 17 (21.0) 16 (25.0)
    Initial NIHSS   7.78±5.32 6.75±4.53 1.26 .136
    Initial MRS 0 0 (0.0) 1 (1.6) 4.61 .465
    1 4 (5.0) 7 (10.9)
    2 12 (15.0) 7 (10.9)
    3 14 (17.5) 15 (23.4)
    4 37 (46.3) 24 (37.5)
    5 13 (16.3) 10 (15.6)
    TOAST LAD 29 (36.3) 14 (21.9) 5.49 .240
    SVD 9 (11.3) 13 (20.3)
    CE 21 (26.3) 15 (23.4)
    Undertermined 9 (11.3) 11 (17.2)
    Others 12 (15.0) 11 (17.2)
    Days of keeping dysphagia diet/tube feeding 10.14±6.80 8.77±5.10 1.34 .271
    Discharge status Home 28 (34.9) 21 (32.8) 2.33 .675
    Rehabilitation unit 33 (41.3) 24 (37.5)
    Other hospitals 19 (23.8) 19 (29.7)
    Length of stay   10.75±6.70 8.97±5.15 2.33 .278

    NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; MRS=modified ranken scale; TOAST=trials of org 10172 in acute stroke; LAD=large artery disease; SVD=small vessel disease; CE=cardiac embolism.

    Outcome Analysis (N=144)

    Variables Categories Cont. (n=80) Exp. (n=64) x2 or t p Predictors Adjusted OR (95% CI) p
    n (%) or n (%) or
    M±SD M±SD
    Incidence of aspiration pneumonia 13 (16.3) 3 (4.7) 4.81 .028 DNP 0.26 (0.67~0.97) .045
    Discharged MRS 0 5 (6.3) 16 (25.0) 19.32 .002  
    1 12 (15.0) 14 (2.9)  
    2 10 (12.5) 6 (9.4)
    3 18 (22.5) 7 (10.9)
    4 21 (26.3) 19 (29.7)
    5 14 (18.0) 2 (3.1)
    Dependency ratio (=MRS 3~5) 53 (66.3) 28 (43.8) 7.31 .011 DNP 0.33 (0.14~0.78) .011
                Initial NIHSS 1.18 (1.05~1.32) .007

    OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; MRS=modified ranken scale; NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; DNP=dysphagia nursing protocol;

    Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial NIHSS, initial MRS, TOAST;

    Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial MRS, TOAST.

    Table 1. Research Design of the Study

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; X=dysphagia nursing protocol; O2=Baseline characteristics, incidence of aspiration pneumonia, discharged modified ranken scale, dependency ratio.

    Table 2. The Demographic and Disease-related Characteristics at Baseline (N=144)

    NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; MRS=modified ranken scale; TOAST=trials of org 10172 in acute stroke; LAD=large artery disease; SVD=small vessel disease; CE=cardiac embolism.

    Table 3. Outcome Analysis (N=144)

    OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; MRS=modified ranken scale; NIHSS=national institutes of health stroke scale; DNP=dysphagia nursing protocol;

    Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial NIHSS, initial MRS, TOAST;

    Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, initial MRS, TOAST.

    TOP