• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Development and Evaluation of Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students

A Young Park, Ph.D., APN1, Kye Ha Kim, Ph.D., RN2
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2016;28(5):559-571.
Published online: October 31, 2016

1Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Gwangju University, Gwangju

2Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea

Corresponding author: Kim, Kye Ha Department of Nursing, Chosun University, 309 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61452, Korea. Tel: +82-62-230-6326, Fax: +82-62-230-6329, E-mail: kyehakim@hanmail.net
• Received: July 27, 2016   • Accepted: October 26, 2016

Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 29 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 9 Crossref
  • 9 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a competency based safety and quality improving education program for undergraduate nursing students.
  • Methods
    A quasi-experimental study of a non-equivalent control group pre and post test design was used. The participants were sixty-eight undergraduate nursing students recruited from the two universities in G and M cities. They were assigned to either a treatment group (n=35) or a comparison group (n=33). A five-day educational program developed based on the ADDIE Instructional Design Model was offered to the treatment group whereas the comparison group did not receive any instruction. Data were collected using self-report structured questionnaires. The data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 21.0 with the x2 test, and independent t-test.
  • Results
    The students in the treatment group reported significant positive changes for patient safety knowledge, skill and perception of quality and safety competencies.
  • Conclusion
    Findings from this study supports that competency based quality improving and safety education program is a useful intervention strategy to promote student's knowledge, skill and perception of quality and safety competencies.
Table 1.
Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program
Day Module /competency Lesson contents Time (min) Teaching method
Day 1 [Module 1] /safety Patient safety over view, QSEN competencies 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, reflection
[Module 2] /safety Error theory, the system approach, contribute to a culture of patient safety 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, reflection
[Module 3] /safety Under standing managing clinical risk. 100 Video, lecture, role play, reflection
Day 2 [Module 4] /safety Hazard prediction training: falls, verbal orders, patient identification, medication error 100 Small group study, hand on practice, reflection
[Module 5] /safety Error reporting, safety tool 100 Lecture, role play, group discussion, reflection
[Module 6] /safety Error disclosure 100 Discussion, lecture, role play, reflection
Day 3 [Module 7] /T&C Key principles of TeamSTEEPPS, Practice of TeamSTEEPPS 200 Lecture, group discussion, role play, reflection
[Module 8] /PCC Patient centered care, engaging with patients, families and caregivers. 100 Group discussion, case study, video, lecture, reflection
Day 4 [Module 9] /EBP What is evidence based practice? Popular-intervention-comparison-outcome search 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, hand on practice, reflection
[Module 10] /QI Quality Improvement, planning a plan-do-study-act cycle 100 Lecture, small group study, hand on practice, reflection
[Module 11] /informatics Informatics 100 Video, lecture, group discussion, reflection
Day 5 [Module 12] /six competencies Case analysis using root cause analysis, establishment of patient safety & QI action plan, drawing up of declaration n 100 Video, hand on practice, Group discussion

T&C=teamwork and collaboration; TeamSTEPPS=strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety; QI=quality improvement; PCC=patient centered care; QI=quality improvement.

Table 2.
Homogeneity Test of General Characteristics and Dependent Variables between the Treatment and Comparison Groups (N=68)
Characteristics Categories Treatment group (n=35) Comparison group (n=33) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year)   21.80±1.55 21.79±1.24    
Satisfaction with major Very high 4 (11.4) 6 (18.2)   .798
High 23 (65.7) 20 (60.6)
Moderate 7 (20.0) 7 (21.2)
Poor 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0)
Grade point average 4.00~4.50 6 (17.1) 2 (6.1) - .082
3.51~3.99 21 (60.0) 15 (45.5)
3.00~3.50 8 (22.9) 14 (42.4)
2.51~2.99 0 (0.0) 2 (6.1)
Perceived knowledge about patient safety Very high 1 (2.9) 1 (3.0) - .718
High 12 (34.3) 10 (30.3)
Moderate 12 (34.3) 16 (48.5)
Poor 10 (28.6) 6 (18.2)
Patient safety education experience Yes 28 (80.0) 26 (78.8) 0.02 .902
No 7 (20.0) 7 (21.2)
Perceived knowledge about QI Very high 0 (0.0) 1 (3.0) - .218
High 5 (14.3) 6 (18.2)
Moderate 8 (22.9) 13 (39.4)
Poor 21 (60.0) 13 (39.4)
Very poor 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0)
QI education experience Yes 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 0.96 1.000
No 34 (97.1) 33 (100)
Knowledge   6.37±0.26 5.70±2.38 1.45 .154
Skills   38.46±4.27 37.25±5.14 1.05 .298
Perception   43.43±2.52 43.39±3.25 0.49 .961

QI=quality improvement;

Fisher's exact test.

Table 3.
Differences between Treatment and Comparison Groups for Dependent Variables (N=68)
Groups Pretest Posttest Difference t p
M±SD M±SD M±SD
Knowledge          
   Treatment group (n=35) 6.37±1.26 16.34±1.64 9.97±1.70 1.68 <.001
Comparison group (n=33) 5.70±2.38 5.18±2.32 -0.52±1.37
Skills          
   Treatment group (n=35) 38.46±4.27 67.69±6.95 29.23±7.38 24.21 <.001
   Comparison group (n=33) 37.25±5.14 34.61±4.69 -2.59±2.34
Perception          
   Treatment group; (n=35) 43.43±2.52 57.11±2.78 13.69±3.13 22.45 <.001
   Comparison group (n=33) 43.39±3.25 42.27±3.77 -1.12±2.26
  • 1.Kim YM, Kil YK, Min J, Jung YY, Choi EKSafety care. Seoul: Korean Nurses Association; 2009.
  • 2.Institute of Medicine. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance, Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 1990.
  • 3.Kim JE, Lee JH, Lee SY. A Korean version of the WHO international classification for patient safety: A validity study. Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics. 2009;15(4):381-92.
  • 4.Park HU. Legal aspects of patient safety. Journal of Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care. 2009;15(1):27-36.
  • 5.Institute of Medicine. Health professions education: A bridge to Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.
  • 6.Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
  • 7.Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Barnsteiner J, Disch J, Johnson J, Mitchell P, et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing Outlook. 2007;55(3):122-31.
  • 8.Chenot TM, Daniel LG. Frameworks for patient safety in the nursing curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education. 2010;49(10):559-68.
  • 9.Sherwood G, Barnsteiner JQuality and Safety in Nursing: A competency based approach to improving outcomes. New Jersey: Wiley Publications.;; 2012.
  • 10.Quality and Safety Education for Nurses Institute. Quality and Safety Competencies [Internet]. Cleveland: Quality and Safety Education for Nurses Institute; 2013. [cited 2013 June 27]. Available from:.http://qsen.org/about-qsen/.
  • 11.Djukic M, Kovner CT, Brewer CS, Fatehi FK, Bernstein I, Aidarus N. Improvements in educational preparedness for quality and safety. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2013;4(2):15-21.
  • 12.Manning ML, Frisby AJ. Multimethod teaching strategies to integrate selected QSEN competencies in a doctor of nursing practice distance education program. Nursing Outlook. 2011;59(3):166-73.
  • 13.Park YM, Kim JA, Ko JK, Chung MS, Bang KS, Choe MA, et al. An identification study on core nursing competency. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(4):663-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.663.
  • 14.Gantt LT, Webb-Corbett R. Using simulation to teach patient safety behaviors in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2010;49(1):48-51.
  • 15.Piscotty R, Grobbel C, Tzeng HM. Integrating quality and safety competencies into undergraduate nursing using student-designed simulation. Journal of Nursing Education. 2011;50(8):429-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110429-04.
  • 16.Murray ME, Douglas S, Girdley D, Jarzemsky P. Teaching quality improvement. Journal of Nursing Education. 2010;49(8):466-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100430-09.
  • 17.Kim YM, Kim SY, Kim MY, Kim JH, Lee SK, Jang MK. Patient safety program and safety culture. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2010;16(4):455-65.
  • 18.Kim MS, Kim YH. Development and evaluation of patient safety reporting promoting education program. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2012;13(1):284-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.1.284.
  • 19.Oh J, Shin HW, Jennie C. QSEN competencies in pre-licensure nursing education and the application to cinenurducation. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2012;18(3):474-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.3.474.
  • 20.National Institute of the Korean Language. Korean standard dictionary [Internet]. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language; 2008. [cited 2012 November 7]. Available from:.http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsp.
  • 21.Schnall R, Stone P, Currie L, Desjardins K, John RM, Bakken S. Development of a self-report instrument to measure patient safety attitudes, skills, and knowledge. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2008;40(4):391-4.
  • 22.Korean Academy of Nursing. The great encyclopedia of nursing science [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Academy of Nursing; 1996. [cited 2012 November 7]. Available from:.http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=486003&cid=50367&categoryId=50367.
  • 23.Miller CL, LaFramboise L. Student learning outcomes after integration of quality and safety education competencies into a senior-level critical care course. Journal of Nursing Education. 2009;48(12):678-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20091113-07.
  • 24.McKeo LM, Norris T, Cardell B, Britt T. Developing patient-centered care competencies among prelicensure nursing students using simulation. Journal of Nursing Education. 2009;48(12):711-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20091113-06.
  • 25.World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: A summary [Internet] Geneva: WHO Press [cited 2012 March 5]. Available from:.http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/who_guidelines-handhygiene_summary.pdf.
  • 26.Myung SJ, Shin JS, Kim JH, Roh HR, Kim Y, Kim J, et al. The patient safety curriculum for undergraduate medical students as a first step toward improving patient safety. Journal of Surgical Education. 2012;69(5):659-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.012.
  • 27.Agency for Health Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS [Internet]. Agency for Health Research and Quality [cited 2012 April 20]. Available from:.http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/index.html.
  • 28.Roh HRDevelopment of competencies for managing and preventing surgical errors with the patient safety education during surgical clerkship. [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2010.
  • 29.Abdi Z, Delgoshaei B, Ravaghi H, Heyrani A. Changing medical students'knowledge, skills, and attitudes about patient safety. HealthMED. 2012;6(9):3129-35.
  • 30.Halbach JL, Sullivan LL. Teaching medical students about medical errors and patient safety: evaluation of a required curriculum. Academy of Medicine. 2005;80(6):600-6.
  • 31.Park SJA study on hospital nurse's perception of patient safety culture and safety care activity. [master's thesis]. Daegu: Keimyung University; 2008.
  • 32.Choi JH, Lee KM, Lee MA. Relationship between hospital nurses' perceived patient safety culture and their safety care activities. Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2010;17(1):64-72.
  • 33.Singh R, Naughton B, Taylor JS, Koenigsberg MR, Anderson DR, McCausland LL, et al. A comprehensive collaborative patient safety residency curriculum to address the ACGME core competencies. Medical Education. 2005;39(1):1195-204.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effectiveness of a Patient Safety Incident Disclosure Education Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study
      Mi Young KIM, Yujeong KIM
      Journal of Nursing Research.2024; 32(3): e332.     CrossRef
    • Development and Evaluation of Patient Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students
      Hyun Ju Kim, Young Soon Jung, Yu Kyung Park
      The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing.2023; 26(1): 39.     CrossRef
    • The effect of flipped learning approach on nursing students' learning of patient safety: A randomized controlled trial
      Evrim Sarıtaş, Zehra Göçmen Baykara
      Nurse Education in Practice.2023; 72: 103742.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of a virtual reality application‐based education programme on patient safety management for nursing students: A pre‐test–post‐test study
      Jae Woo Oh, Ji Eun Kim
      Nursing Open.2023; 10(12): 7622.     CrossRef
    • Evaluating a patient safety course for undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
      Seung Eun Lee, V. Susan Dahinten
      Collegian.2023; 30(1): 75.     CrossRef
    • The Effects of a Simulation-Based Patient Safety Education Program on Compliance with Patient Safety, Perception of Patient Safety Culture, and Educational Satisfaction of Operating Room Nurses
      OkBun Park, MiYang Jeon, MiSeon Kim, ByeolAh Kim, HyeonCheol Jeong
      Healthcare.2023; 11(21): 2824.     CrossRef
    • Study on Educational Needs of Patient Safety Nursing Activities in Intensive Care Units: Utilizing Importance-Performance Analysis
      Seung Hee Lee, Nam Hee Park
      Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2022; 15(3): 1.     CrossRef
    • Factors Affecting the Patient Safety Management Activity of Nursing Students: A Quantile Regression Approach
      Myungsuk Kang, Yeonsoo Jang, Ui Rim Song
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2020; 26(3): 230.     CrossRef
    • Effects of a patient safety course using a flipped classroom approach among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
      Young Man Kim, Yea Seul Yoon, Hye Chong Hong, Ari Min
      Nurse Education Today.2019; 79: 180.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Development and Evaluation of Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28(5):559-571.   Published online October 31, 2016
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Development and Evaluation of Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28(5):559-571.   Published online October 31, 2016
    Close
    Development and Evaluation of Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students
    Development and Evaluation of Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students

    Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program

    Day Module /competency Lesson contents Time (min) Teaching method
    Day 1 [Module 1] /safety Patient safety over view, QSEN competencies 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, reflection
    [Module 2] /safety Error theory, the system approach, contribute to a culture of patient safety 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, reflection
    [Module 3] /safety Under standing managing clinical risk. 100 Video, lecture, role play, reflection
    Day 2 [Module 4] /safety Hazard prediction training: falls, verbal orders, patient identification, medication error 100 Small group study, hand on practice, reflection
    [Module 5] /safety Error reporting, safety tool 100 Lecture, role play, group discussion, reflection
    [Module 6] /safety Error disclosure 100 Discussion, lecture, role play, reflection
    Day 3 [Module 7] /T&C Key principles of TeamSTEEPPS, Practice of TeamSTEEPPS 200 Lecture, group discussion, role play, reflection
    [Module 8] /PCC Patient centered care, engaging with patients, families and caregivers. 100 Group discussion, case study, video, lecture, reflection
    Day 4 [Module 9] /EBP What is evidence based practice? Popular-intervention-comparison-outcome search 100 Video, group discussion, lecture, hand on practice, reflection
    [Module 10] /QI Quality Improvement, planning a plan-do-study-act cycle 100 Lecture, small group study, hand on practice, reflection
    [Module 11] /informatics Informatics 100 Video, lecture, group discussion, reflection
    Day 5 [Module 12] /six competencies Case analysis using root cause analysis, establishment of patient safety & QI action plan, drawing up of declaration n 100 Video, hand on practice, Group discussion

    T&C=teamwork and collaboration; TeamSTEPPS=strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety; QI=quality improvement; PCC=patient centered care; QI=quality improvement.

    Homogeneity Test of General Characteristics and Dependent Variables between the Treatment and Comparison Groups (N=68)

    Characteristics Categories Treatment group (n=35) Comparison group (n=33) x2 or t p
    n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
    Age (year)   21.80±1.55 21.79±1.24    
    Satisfaction with major Very high 4 (11.4) 6 (18.2)   .798
    High 23 (65.7) 20 (60.6)
    Moderate 7 (20.0) 7 (21.2)
    Poor 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0)
    Grade point average 4.00~4.50 6 (17.1) 2 (6.1) - .082
    3.51~3.99 21 (60.0) 15 (45.5)
    3.00~3.50 8 (22.9) 14 (42.4)
    2.51~2.99 0 (0.0) 2 (6.1)
    Perceived knowledge about patient safety Very high 1 (2.9) 1 (3.0) - .718
    High 12 (34.3) 10 (30.3)
    Moderate 12 (34.3) 16 (48.5)
    Poor 10 (28.6) 6 (18.2)
    Patient safety education experience Yes 28 (80.0) 26 (78.8) 0.02 .902
    No 7 (20.0) 7 (21.2)
    Perceived knowledge about QI Very high 0 (0.0) 1 (3.0) - .218
    High 5 (14.3) 6 (18.2)
    Moderate 8 (22.9) 13 (39.4)
    Poor 21 (60.0) 13 (39.4)
    Very poor 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0)
    QI education experience Yes 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 0.96 1.000
    No 34 (97.1) 33 (100)
    Knowledge   6.37±0.26 5.70±2.38 1.45 .154
    Skills   38.46±4.27 37.25±5.14 1.05 .298
    Perception   43.43±2.52 43.39±3.25 0.49 .961

    QI=quality improvement;

    Fisher's exact test.

    Differences between Treatment and Comparison Groups for Dependent Variables (N=68)

    Groups Pretest Posttest Difference t p
    M±SD M±SD M±SD
    Knowledge          
       Treatment group (n=35) 6.37±1.26 16.34±1.64 9.97±1.70 1.68 <.001
    Comparison group (n=33) 5.70±2.38 5.18±2.32 -0.52±1.37
    Skills          
       Treatment group (n=35) 38.46±4.27 67.69±6.95 29.23±7.38 24.21 <.001
       Comparison group (n=33) 37.25±5.14 34.61±4.69 -2.59±2.34
    Perception          
       Treatment group; (n=35) 43.43±2.52 57.11±2.78 13.69±3.13 22.45 <.001
       Comparison group (n=33) 43.39±3.25 42.27±3.77 -1.12±2.26
    Table 1. Competency Based Quality Improvement and Safety Education Program

    T&C=teamwork and collaboration; TeamSTEPPS=strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety; QI=quality improvement; PCC=patient centered care; QI=quality improvement.

    Table 2. Homogeneity Test of General Characteristics and Dependent Variables between the Treatment and Comparison Groups (N=68)

    QI=quality improvement;

    Fisher's exact test.

    Table 3. Differences between Treatment and Comparison Groups for Dependent Variables (N=68)

    TOP