• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Effects of Upper Meridian Massage on Cerebral Blood flow, Emotions, and Sleep of the Institutionalized Elderly

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2014;26(2):171-180.
Published online: April 30, 2014

1Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Daejeon University, Daejeon

2Department of Nursing, Daejeon Health Science College, Daejeon, Korea

Corresponding author: Nam, Mi Jung Department of Nursing, Daejeon Health Science College, 21 Chungjeong-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 300-711, Korea. Tel: +82-42-670-9377, Fax: +82-42-670-9571, E-mail: mjnam@hit.ac.kr
• Received: September 5, 2013   • Accepted: April 7, 2014

© 2014 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 19 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
  • 1 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study was to investigate the effects of upper meridian massage on cerebral blood flow, emotions, and sleep of the institutionalized elderly.
  • Methods
    This study was a nonequivalent control group pre- and posttest design. The participants were 50 elderly (26 in the experimental group; 24 in the control group) living in the institutions. Data were collected between July 9 and September 1, 2011. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, and x2-test, Repeated Measures ANOVA, and Cronbach's ⍺ coefficient. Each participant in the experimental group received the upper meridian massage for 10 minutes, 4 times per week for 2 weeks. Each participant's cerebral blood flow and self-reported questionnaires were tested before treatment, after 1 week and 2 weeks during treatment sessions.
  • Results
    There were significant differences in sleep and emotions after 1 week and 2 weeks during treatment sessions. But cerebral blood flow measured by common carotid artery pulsatility index (CCA PI) and common carotid artery resistance index (CCA RI) demonstrated significant differences in 2 week point in time.
  • Conclusion
    These results indicated that upper meridian massage could be an effective intervention for improving cerebral blood flow, emotions, and sleep of the institutionalized elderly.
Table 1.
Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics and Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)
Variables Categories Total (n=50) Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=24) x2 or t p
n (%), M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Gender Male 17 (34.0) 12 (46.2) 5 (20.8) 3.57 .059
Female 33 (66.0) 14 (53.8) 19 (79.2)
Age (year)   80.0±6.68 78.6±7.85 81.5±4.86 -1.52 .134
Spouse Yes 5 (10.0) 1 (3.8) 4 (16.7) 4.32 .076
No 43 (86.0) 25 (96.2) 18 (75.0)
No response 2 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (8.3)
Religion Yes 21 (42.0) 11 (42.3) 10 (41.7) 4.12 .135
No 22 (44.0) 9 (34.6) 13 (54.2)
No response 7 (14.0) 6 (23.1) 1 (4.2)
Education Uneducated 7 (14.0) 3 (11.5) 4 (16.7) 0.37 .923
More than elementary 30 (60.0) 16 (61.5) 14 (58.3)
school 13 (26.0) 7 (26.9) 6 (25.0)
No response
MMSE-K   23.6±2.89 23.5±2.75 23.7±3.09 -0.20 .841
Disease Hypertension 37 (74.0) 19 (73.1) 18 (78.3) 0.18 .674
Arthritis 35 (70.0) 21 (80.8) 14 (60.9) 2.37 .124
Diabetes mellitus 16 (32.0) 9 (34.6) 7 (30.4) 0.10 .755
Other conditions 13 (26.0) 5 (19.2) 8 (34.8) 1.51 .218
Total 48 (96.0) 26 (100.0) 22 (91.7) 2.26 .133

Exp.=Experimental group; Con.=Control group; MMSE-K=Mini Mental State Examination-Korea

Table 2.
Homogeneity Test for Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)
Variables Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=24) t p
M±SD M±SD
Sleep Scale A 41.32±9.39 39.47±7.79 0.89 .379
POMS 54.00±21.04 58.40±22.18 -0.91 .369
CCA RI 0.90±0.13 0.86±0.15 1.24 .220
CCA PI 2.46±1.04 2.14±0.78 1.47 .148

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index; CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

Table 3.
Repeated Measures ANOVA in Dependent Variables (N=50
Variables Groups Pre-test Intervention Posttest F (p) Source F (p)
M±SD M±SD M±SD
Sleep scale A Exp. 41.32±9.39 45.56±8.88 47.40±8.26 5.98 (.005) Time 4.07 (.020)
Cont. 39.47±7.79 41.85±8.37 39.14±8.27 1.43 (.252) Group 4.60 (.037)
          G×T 3.16 (.047)
POMS Exp. 54.00±21.04 42.35±19.03 30.31±18.38 15.50 (<.001) Time 7.85 (.001)
Cont. 58.40±22.18 52.95±25.95 61.00±22.21 3.10 (.057) Group 7.84 (.008)
          G×T 11.81 (<.001)
CCA RI Exp. 0.90±0.13 0.86±0.13 0.84±0.14 3.38 (.042 §) Time 0.11 (.897)
Cont. 0.86±0.15 0.89±0.15 0.90±0.13 0.99 (.381) Group 0.24 (.624)
          G×T 3.71 (.028)
CCA PI Exp. 2.46±1.04 2.22±0.86 1.97±0.80 3.27 (.046||) Time 0.87 (.423)
Cont. 2.14±0.78 2.40±0.71 2.34±0.71 1.22 (.304) Group 0.18 (.672)
          G×T 3.69 (.029)

Exp.=experimental group, Cont.=control group; Intervention=posttest in 1week; Posttest=posttest in 2 weeks; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index, CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.022), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.008) No significant differences intervention and posttest (p=.299);

Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.011), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p<.001) Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.004);

§No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.107), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.028) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.301);

No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.209), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.022) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.196).

  • Almeida O. P., Pfaff J. J.. 2005;Sleep complaints among older general practice patients: Association with depression. British Journal of General Practice. 55(520):864–-866.
  • Battaglia S.. 2003. The complete guide to aromatherapy. 2nd ed.. Brisbane QLD: Perfect Potion.
  • Cho S. J., Chung C. S., Lee K. H.. 1998;Reference values of transcranial doppler ultrasonography measurements of healthy adult with normal MRI and MRA findings. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association. 16:264–-270.
  • Choi S. I., Kim H. K., Kim H. J., Suh M. K., Kim Y. H., Kim M. L., et al. 2000;The effects of meridian massage on the functions of upper limbs and depression of hemiplegic patients. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 3(2):228–-242.
  • Fairhead J. F., Rothwell P. M.. 2005;The need for urgency in identification and treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis is already established. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 19:355–-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000085201.
  • Feinsilver S. H.. 2003;Sleep in the elderly: What is normal? Clinics in Geritric Medicine. 19(1):177–-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690%2802%2900064-2.
  • Haseli-mashhadi N., Dadd T., Pan A., Yu Z., Lin X., Franco O. H.. 2009;Sleep quality in middle-age and elderly chinese: Distribution, associated factors and associations with cario-metabolic risk factors. Biomedcentral Public Health. 9:130http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-130.
  • Im Y. K., Kim T. H., Lee G. Y.. 2006. University meridiano-logy practice. 2nd ed.. Daegeon: OBdesign.
  • Jeong G. H., Oh Y. H., Lee Y. K., Shon C. K., Park B. M., Lee S. Y., et al. 2012. Survey of the elderly 2011. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; Web site:.https://www.kihasa.re.kr/html/jsp/publication/policy/list.jsp?key=title&ryear_value=2014&query=2011.
  • Joo E. Y., Hong S. B., Tae W. S., Kim J. H., Han S. J., Cho Y. W., et al. 2005;Cerebral perfusion abnormality in narcolepsy with cataplexy. Neurolmage. 28(2):410–-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.019.
  • Jung H. M., Kim H., Han S. B., Kim J. S., Kim J. Ha, Kim J. Hb, et al. 2009;Pulsatility index detected by carotid ultrasonography can predict increased intracranial pressure. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 20(4):415–-521.
  • Kamel N. S., Gammack J. K.. 2006;Insomnia in the elderly: Cause, approach, and treatment. The American Journal of Medicine. 119:463–-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.051.
  • Kang H. S., Kim K. J.. 2000;The correlation between depression and physical health among the aged. The Korean Public Health Association. 26(4):451–-459.
  • Kang H. S., Sok S. H., Kang J. S.. 2007;Comparison of the effects of meridian massage and hand massage on the affected upper extremity of stroke patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 14:270–-279.
  • Kim G. D.. 2000;A study on sleep patterns, sleep disturbing factors and quality of sleep in the institutionalized elderly. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 10:247–-270.
  • Kim J. M., Shin I. S., Yoon J. S., Lee H. Y.. 2003;Comparison of diagnostic validities between MMSE-K and K-MMSE for screening of dementia. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 42(1):124–-130.
  • Kim M. J., Jeon H. J.. 2006. Oriental medicine acupuncture therapy. Seoul: Jungdammedia.
  • Labrique W. F., Keister K. J., Russell A. C.. 2010;Massage therapy for stress management: Implications for nursing practice. Orthopaedic Nursing. 29(4):258–-259.
  • Lee G. E.. 2002;A grounded theory approach to the adjustment process of the institutionalized elderly: The control of reluctance. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 32:624–-632.
  • Lee J. S., Seo N. S.. 2010;Effects of the meridian massage on the hand edema, activities of daily living, and depression in stroke patient. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 22(2):171–-181.
  • Lee S. H., Shin K. H., Kim J. U.. 2004;Effect of seven points of CVA acupuncture on cerebral blood flow. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 21(3):83–-97.
  • Mitzel-Wilkinson A.. 2000;Massage therapy as a nursing practice. Holistic Nursing Practice. 14(2):48–-56.
  • Moon S. K., Cho K. H., Ko C. N., Kim Y. S., Bae H. S., Lee K. S.. 2000;Effects of opposing-needling on upper limb on cerebral blood flow in ischemic stroke patients. The Journal of Kyung Hee University Medical Center. 16(1):94–-101.
  • Oh J. J.. 2000;The effect of hand-massage on the relaxation of dementia patient. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 30(4):825–-835.
  • Oh J. J., Song M. S., Kim S. M.. 1998;Development and validation of Korean sleep scale A. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 28:563–-572.
  • Sands-Lincoln M., Loucks E. B., Lu B., Carskadon M. A., Sharkey K., Stefanick M. L., et al. 2013;Sleep duration, insomnia, and coronary heart disease among postmenopausal women in the women's health Initiative. Journal of Women's Health, June. 22(6):477–-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3918.
  • Schebesch K. M., Simka S., Woertgen C., Brawanski A., Ro-thoerl R. D.. 2004;Normal values of volume flow in the internal carotid artery measured by a new angle-independent doppler technique for evaluating cerebral perfusion. Acta Neurochirurgica. 146(9):983–-987.
  • Shin Y. H.. 1996;A study on verification of the profile of mood states (POMS) for Korean elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 26:743–-753.
  • Song M. S., Kim N. C.. 2009;Effect of hand massage on fatigue, sleep satisfaction and blood pressure of the aged in a long-term care facility. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 21(2):179–-186.
  • Swick T. J.. 2012;The neurology of sleep. Sleep Medicine Clinics. 7(3):399–-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsmc.2012.06.003.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Improve the Sleep of Korean Elderly: A Systematic Review
      Yunhee Park, Hyun Jung Yun
      Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2022; 29(1): 67.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Effects of Upper Meridian Massage on Cerebral Blood flow, Emotions, and Sleep of the Institutionalized Elderly
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(2):171-180.   Published online April 30, 2014
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Effects of Upper Meridian Massage on Cerebral Blood flow, Emotions, and Sleep of the Institutionalized Elderly
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(2):171-180.   Published online April 30, 2014
    Close
    Effects of Upper Meridian Massage on Cerebral Blood flow, Emotions, and Sleep of the Institutionalized Elderly
    Effects of Upper Meridian Massage on Cerebral Blood flow, Emotions, and Sleep of the Institutionalized Elderly

    Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics and Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)

    Variables Categories Total (n=50) Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=24) x2 or t p
    n (%), M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
    Gender Male 17 (34.0) 12 (46.2) 5 (20.8) 3.57 .059
    Female 33 (66.0) 14 (53.8) 19 (79.2)
    Age (year)   80.0±6.68 78.6±7.85 81.5±4.86 -1.52 .134
    Spouse Yes 5 (10.0) 1 (3.8) 4 (16.7) 4.32 .076
    No 43 (86.0) 25 (96.2) 18 (75.0)
    No response 2 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (8.3)
    Religion Yes 21 (42.0) 11 (42.3) 10 (41.7) 4.12 .135
    No 22 (44.0) 9 (34.6) 13 (54.2)
    No response 7 (14.0) 6 (23.1) 1 (4.2)
    Education Uneducated 7 (14.0) 3 (11.5) 4 (16.7) 0.37 .923
    More than elementary 30 (60.0) 16 (61.5) 14 (58.3)
    school 13 (26.0) 7 (26.9) 6 (25.0)
    No response
    MMSE-K   23.6±2.89 23.5±2.75 23.7±3.09 -0.20 .841
    Disease Hypertension 37 (74.0) 19 (73.1) 18 (78.3) 0.18 .674
    Arthritis 35 (70.0) 21 (80.8) 14 (60.9) 2.37 .124
    Diabetes mellitus 16 (32.0) 9 (34.6) 7 (30.4) 0.10 .755
    Other conditions 13 (26.0) 5 (19.2) 8 (34.8) 1.51 .218
    Total 48 (96.0) 26 (100.0) 22 (91.7) 2.26 .133

    Exp.=Experimental group; Con.=Control group; MMSE-K=Mini Mental State Examination-Korea

    Homogeneity Test for Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)

    Variables Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=24) t p
    M±SD M±SD
    Sleep Scale A 41.32±9.39 39.47±7.79 0.89 .379
    POMS 54.00±21.04 58.40±22.18 -0.91 .369
    CCA RI 0.90±0.13 0.86±0.15 1.24 .220
    CCA PI 2.46±1.04 2.14±0.78 1.47 .148

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index; CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

    Repeated Measures ANOVA in Dependent Variables (N=50

    Variables Groups Pre-test Intervention Posttest F (p) Source F (p)
    M±SD M±SD M±SD
    Sleep scale A Exp. 41.32±9.39 45.56±8.88 47.40±8.26 5.98 (.005) Time 4.07 (.020)
    Cont. 39.47±7.79 41.85±8.37 39.14±8.27 1.43 (.252) Group 4.60 (.037)
              G×T 3.16 (.047)
    POMS Exp. 54.00±21.04 42.35±19.03 30.31±18.38 15.50 (<.001) Time 7.85 (.001)
    Cont. 58.40±22.18 52.95±25.95 61.00±22.21 3.10 (.057) Group 7.84 (.008)
              G×T 11.81 (<.001)
    CCA RI Exp. 0.90±0.13 0.86±0.13 0.84±0.14 3.38 (.042 §) Time 0.11 (.897)
    Cont. 0.86±0.15 0.89±0.15 0.90±0.13 0.99 (.381) Group 0.24 (.624)
              G×T 3.71 (.028)
    CCA PI Exp. 2.46±1.04 2.22±0.86 1.97±0.80 3.27 (.046||) Time 0.87 (.423)
    Cont. 2.14±0.78 2.40±0.71 2.34±0.71 1.22 (.304) Group 0.18 (.672)
              G×T 3.69 (.029)

    Exp.=experimental group, Cont.=control group; Intervention=posttest in 1week; Posttest=posttest in 2 weeks; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index, CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

    Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.022), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.008) No significant differences intervention and posttest (p=.299);

    Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.011), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p<.001) Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.004);

    §No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.107), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.028) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.301);

    No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.209), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.022) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.196).

    Table 1. Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics and Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)

    Exp.=Experimental group; Con.=Control group; MMSE-K=Mini Mental State Examination-Korea

    Table 2. Homogeneity Test for Outcome Variables between Two Groups (N=50)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index; CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

    Table 3. Repeated Measures ANOVA in Dependent Variables (N=50

    Exp.=experimental group, Cont.=control group; Intervention=posttest in 1week; Posttest=posttest in 2 weeks; POMS=profile of mood states; CCA RI=common carotid artery resistance index, CCA PI=common carotid artery pulsatility index.

    Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.022), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.008) No significant differences intervention and posttest (p=.299);

    Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.011), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p<.001) Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.004);

    No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.107), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.028) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.301);

    No Significant differences between the pre-test and intervention (p=.209), Significant differences between the pre-test and posttest (p=.022) No Significant differences between the intervention and posttest (p=.196).

    TOP