• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

The Effects of Delirium Care Training Program for Nurses in Hospital Nursing Units

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2014;26(5):489-499.
Published online: October 31, 2014

College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea

Corresponding author: Lee, Haejung College of Nursing, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 626-770, Korea. Tel: +82-51-510-8344, Fax: +82-51-510-8308, E-mail: haejung@pusan.ac.kr
• Received: July 6, 2014   • Accepted: September 24, 2014

Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 26 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 13 Crossref
next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of delirium care training program on the nurses’ knowledge of delirium, self-confidence and performance levels in caring patients with delirium.
  • Methods
    The study was used a quasi-experimental design. The participants were 131 nurses in general nursing units in B and J hospitals. Sixty four nurses in B hospital were allocated into the experimental group and 67 nurses from J hospital into the control group. The delirium care training program was composed of lecture and clinical practice. Clinical practice of delirium care was applied everyday for 4 consecutive weeks starting from the admission day of the older adults(≥70 years old), using ‘short CAM' and ‘nursing checklist for delirium prevention’.
  • Results
    The knowledge of delirium, self-confidence in caring patients, and performance levels of nursing care were significantly increased in the experimental group compared to the control group.
  • Conclusion
    The findings of this study provided the evidence for the potential utility of the delirium care training program and underscored the needs of broader application of the training program of delirium care for nurses in general nursing units.
Table 1.
Components and Contents of The Delirium Care Training Program
Components Contents
Education (1 hour) ․ Provide one hour lecture about the definition, prevalence, characteristics, categories, possible causes, assessment tools, and intervention of delirium.
․ Introduce 'delirium assessment tools' and 'checklist for nursing intervention of patients with delirium' and educate how to use the tools and checklists.
․ Questions and answers.
Practical training (4 weeks) Delirium assessment tool ․ Perform the short CAM for every older patient (≥70) who admitted to the floor from the admission date to 7 days after admission.
․ Get feedback from charge nurses about the accurate usage of the delirium assessment tool.
Checklist for preventive nursing care of delirium ․ Perform 'checklist for preventive nursing of delirium' for every older patient (≥70) who admitted to the floor from the admission date to 7 days after admission.
․ Share the experience with the principle investigator about the difficulties to perform the checklist, missing items and reasons. Get feedback from the principle investigator about the accurate usage of the checklist.
Table 2.
Homogeneity of General Characteristics between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)
Characteristics Categories Exp. (n=64) Cont. (n=67) x2 p
n (%) n (%)
Age (year) <25 34 (53.1) 28 (41.8) 4.78 .092
25~29 25 (39.1) 25 (37.3)
≥30 5 (7.8) 14 (20.9)
Marital status Unmarried 60 (93.8) 57 (85.1) 2.58 .108
Married 4 (6.3) 10 (14.9)
Religion Christian 5 (7.8) 7 (10.4) 0.90 .825
Catholic 2 (3.1) 3 (4.5)
Buddhist 15 (23.4) 12 (17.9)
None 42 (65.6) 45 (67.2)
Educational level Junior college 53 (82.8) 52 (77.6) 0.56 .456
≥University 11 (17.2) 15 (22.4)
Clinical career (year) ≥1~<5 47 (73.4) 50 (74.6) 0.02 .877
≥5 17 (26.6) 17 (25.4)
Department Internal medicine 17 (26.6) 24 (35.8) 8.72 .069
Orthopedics 34 (53.1) 20 (29.9)
General surgery 8 (12.5) 11 (16.4)
Neurology or neurosurgery 4 (6.3) 7 (10.4)
Other 1 (1.6) 5 (7.5)
Necessity of delirium education Urgently needed 15 (23.4) 13 (19.4) 4.58 .102
Needed 47 (73.4) 45 (67.2)
So so 2 (3.1) 9 (13.4)
Experience of delirium education Yes 22 (34.4) 29 (43.3) 1.09 .296
No 42 (65.6) 38 (56.7)
Ways to get delirium education In hospital 4 (18.2) 4 (13.8) 0.18 .670
In college 18 (81.8) 25 (86.2)
Number of education 1 16 (72.7) 18 (66.7) 1.83 .609
2 3 (13.6) 6 (22.2)
≥3 3 (13.6) 3 (11.1)
Had manuals for delirium care Yes 4 (6.3) 4 (6.0) 0.00 .947
No 60 (93.8) 63 (94.0)

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 3.
Homogeneity of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance (N=131)
Variables Exp. (n=64) Cont. (n=67) t p
M±SD M±SD
Total Knowledge of delirium 33.58±3.47 33.30±3.47 0.46 .646
   Etiology 9.19±0.97 8.96±1.15 1.25 .215
   Symptoms 13.64±1.98 13.61±1.85 0.09 .932
   Management 10.75±2.20 10.73±2.24 0.05 .962
Self-confidence of nursing 49.58±11.44 53.65±14.28 -1.80 .075
Nursing performance 2.79±0.28 2.89±0.38 -1.56 .121

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 4.
Comparison of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)
Variables Exp. (n=64) Paired t-test (p) Cont. (n=67) Paired t-test (p) Group differences at posttests (p)
Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest
M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD
Total Knowledge of delirium e 33.58±3.47 38.77±2.75 11.62 33.30±3.47 32.84±3.63 -1.06 10.49
    (<.001)     (.295) (<.001)
  Etiology 9.19±0.97 9.63±0.55 3.72 8.96±1.15 8.97±1.13 0.86 4.25
    (<.001)     (.932) (<.001)
  Symptoms 13.64±1.98 15.83±2.03 8.13 13.61±1.85 12.87±1.87 -1.85 8.69
    (<.001)     (.069) (<.001)
  Management t 10.75±2.20 13.31±1.14 9.98 10.73±2.24 11.00±2.15 0.98 7.73
    (<.001)     (.331) (<.001)
Self-confidence of nursing 49.58±11.44 72.31±7.33 16.67 53.65±14.28   -0.39 9.73
    (<.001)   53.05±14.36 (.695) (<.001)
Nursing performance 2.79±0.28 3.34±0.35 11.66 2.89±0.38 2.82±0.42 -1.41 7.77
    (<.001)     (.163) (<.001)

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 5.
Differences in Item by Item Nursing Performance in the Experimental Group (N =64)
Item Nursing performance Pretest Post-test Differences (Post-Pre) p
M±SD M±SD
1 Assess potential risks of delirium 2.19±0.91 2.80±0.89 0.61 <.001
2 Assess the patient's mental status accurately 3.28±0.68 3.42±0.59 0.14 .151
3 Talk to the patient repeatedly about date, time, place, people 2.47±0.69 3.38±0.68 0.91 <.001
4 Explain to the patient before providing nursing care (or treatment) 3.55±0.64 3.72±0.49 0.17 .047
5 Listen to the words of the patient 3.42±0.66 3.77±0.43 0.34 <.001
6 Communicate softly in the patient room 3.22±0.72 3.50±0.59 0.28 .013
7 Perform all nursing activities (or treatment) at the same time during the night 2.81±0.87 3.41±0.60 0.59 <.001
8 Keep Machines' alarm sounds at minimum 2.78±0.98 3.17±0.63 0.39 .005
9 Encourage to use eye glasses if visual acuity is impaired 2.88±0.92 3.47±0.59 0.59 <.001
10 Remove catheters as soon as possible 2.70±0.79 3.08±0.60 0.38 .002
11 Encourage to use hearing aid and communication tools if needed (ex: word cards) 2.66±0.91 3.31±0.75 0.66 <.001
12 Perform cognitive stimulation activities (ex: word games, repeated information, provide a clock or calendar) 1.92±0.76 3.14±0.79 1.22 <.001
13 Avoid restraints 2.16±1.04 3.27±0.93 1.11 <.001
14 Check the signs of dehydration 2.47±0.69 3.27±0.67 0.80 <.001
15 Check the triggers, if delirium occurs 2.61±0.66 3.17±0.61 0.56 <.001
16 Control pain 3.53±0.50 3.78±0.42 0.25 .001
17 Encourage family members to be with patients at bed side 3.34±0.62 3.61±0.49 0.27 .006
18 Provide safe environment keeping soft light during the night 3.19±0.61 3.64±0.48 0.45 <.001
19 Educate the family and caregivers about delirium 2.70±0.85 3.36±0.68 0.66 <.001
20 Keep the environment clean removing unnecessary objects 2.80±0.72 3.22±0.63 0.42 <.001
21 Encourage to bring familiar objects or family photos, etc. 1.98±0.85 2.88±0.83 0.89 <.001
22 Encourage early ambulation 2.67±0.76 3.53±0.59 0.86 <.001
23 Consult with doctors to reduce the number of medication 2.56±0.91 2.98±0.70 0.42 .001
  • Akechi T., Ishiguro C., Okuyama T., Endo C., Sagawa R., Uchida M., et al. 2010;Delirium training program for nurses. Psychosomatics. 51(2):106–-111.
  • Arend E., Christensen M.. 2009;Delirium in the intensive care unit: A review. Nursing in Critical Care. 14(3):145–-154.
  • Arnold E.. 2005;Sorting out the 3 D's: Delirium, dementia, depression: Learn how to sift through overlapping signs and symptoms so you can help improve an older patient's quality of life. Holistic Nursing Practice. 19(3):99–-104.
  • Cho H. J.. 2011;Effect of delirium education on delirium knowledge and delirium nursing practice of Intensive Care Unit nurses Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam National University, Gwangju..
  • Fong T. G., Tulebaev S. R., Inouye S. K.. 2009;Delirium in elderly adults: Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Nature Reviews Neurology. 5(4):210–-220.
  • Fosnight S.. 2011. Delirium in the elderly. In: Ruby C. M., Sherer J. T., editors. Geriatrics. 7th ed.. ) (pp..p. 73–-96. Washington, DC: American College of Clinical Pharmacy.
  • Heo I. S.. 2011;The effects of delirium education program on nursing practice and stress, for Intensive Care Unit nurses Unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Yongin..
  • Inouye S. K., Foreman M. D., Mion L. C., Katz K. H., Cooney L. M.. 2001;Nurses' recognition of delirium and its symptoms. Archives Internal Medicine. 161(20):2467–-2473.
  • Inouye S. K., van Dyck C. H., Alessi C. A., Balkin S., Siegal A. P., Horwitz R. I.. 1990;Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method. Annals of Internal Medicine. 113(12):941–-948.
  • Kim K. H., Kho D. H., Shin J. Y., Choi J. Y., Kim E. S., Kim D. H.. 2008;Risk factors of postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures. Journal of the Korean Fractures Society. 21(3):189–-194.
  • Kim M. Y., Eun Y.. 2013;Knowledge, performance, and stress about care for delirium in orthopedic hospital nurses. The Journal of Muscle and Joint Health. 20(1):72–-80.
  • Lee Y. W., Kim C. G., Kong E. S., Kim K. B., Kim N. C., Kim H. K., et al. 2007;A study of nurses' knowledge level and assessment experience of delirium. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing. 19(1):35–-44.
  • Martinez F. T., Tobar C., Beddings C. I., Vallejo G., Fuentes P.. 2012;Preventing delirium in an acute hospital using a non-pharmacological intervention. Age and Ageing. 41(5):629–-634.
  • McCusker J., Cole M., Dendukuri N., Belzile E., Primeau F.. 2001;Delirium in older medical inpatients and subsequent cognitive and functional status: A prospective study. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 165(5):575–-583.
  • Meagher D. J., Leonard M., Donnelly S., Conroy M., Adamis D., Trzepacz P. T.. 2011;A longitudinal study motor subtypes in delirium: Relationship with other phenomenology, etiology, medication exposure and prognosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 71(6):395–-403.
  • Milisen K., Lemiengre J., Braes T., Foreman M. D.. 2005;Multicomponent intervention strategies for managing delirium in hospitalized older people: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 52(1):79–-90.
  • Miller J., Neelon V., Champagne M., Bailey D., Ng'andu N., Belyea M., et al. 1997;The assessment of acute confusion as part of nursing care. Applied Nursing Research. 10(3):143–-151.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2010;Delirium: diagnosis, prevention and management Retrieved April 18, 2013, from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Web site:.http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg103.
  • Park E. A., Kim M. A.. 2005;The development and effects of an educational program on acute confusion in hospitalized patients for nurses Poster session presented at the 5th International Nursing Conference, Seoul..
  • Park Y. S.. 2011;The development and effects of evidence-based nursing practice guideline for the nursing of delirium in cancer patients Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju.
  • Park Y. S., Kim K. S., Song K. J., Kang J. A.. 2006;A preliminary survey of nurses' understanding of delirium and their need for delirium education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 36(7):1183–-1192.
  • Pun B. T., Gordon S. M., Peterson J. F., Shintani A. K., Jackson J. C., Foss J., et al. 2005;Large-scale implementation of sedation and delirium monitoring in the intensive care unit: A report from two medical centers. Critical Care Medicine. 33(6):1199–-1205.
  • Rapp C. G., Onega L. L., Tripp-Reimer T., Mobily P., Wakefield B., Kundrat M., et al. 2001;Training of acute confusion resource nurses. knowledge, perceived confidence, and role. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 27(4):34–-40.
  • Ryan D. J., O'Regan N. A., Caoimh R. O., Clare J., O'Connor M., Leonard M., et al. 2013;Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: Predictors, prevalence and detection. BMJ Open. 3(1):http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001772.
  • Shi Q., Presutti R., Selchen D., Saposnik G.. 2012;Delirium in acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 43(3):645–-649.
  • Statistics Korea. 2011;Population Projections for Korea: 2010-2060 (Based on the 2010 Census) Retrieved April 4, 2013, from the Statistics Korea Web site:.http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/2/6/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=252623.
  • Steis M. R., Fick D. M.. 2008;Are nurses recognizing delirium? A systematic review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 34(9):40–-48.
  • Vidán M. T., Sánchez E., Alonso M., Montero B., Ortiz J., Serra J. A.. 2009;An intervention integrated into daily clinical practice reduces the incidence of delirium during hospitalization in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 57(11):2029–-2036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02485.x.
  • Witlox J., Eurelings L. S., de Jonghe J. F., Kalisvaart K. J., Eike-lenboom P., van Gool W. A.. 2010;Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia. Journal of the American Medical Association. 304(4):443–-451.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • The influence of delirium knowledge, critical thinking disposition, and compassion competence on delirium nursing performance in general hospital clinical nurses: A cross-sectional descriptive study
      Hyang Sook Lee, Jeong Eun Yang
      Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2025; 27(1): 95.     CrossRef
    • Relationship between Barriers and Performance for Delirium Care among Hospital Nurses: The Mediating Effect of Self-confidence
      Hee Yeon Kim, Hye-Ja Park
      Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2025; 50(1): 81.     CrossRef
    • Factors Influencing Intensive Care Unit Nurses’ Competency in Delirium Care in A Tertiary General Hospital
      Mi Ran Lim, Gyoo Yeong Cho
      Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2024; 17(3): 37.     CrossRef
    • The effect of nurses’ knowledge and self-confidence on delirium nursing performance of nurses in an integrated nursing and caring services ward: A cross-sectional descriptive study
      Ho Yeong Kim, Su Ol Kim
      Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2024; 26(1): 80.     CrossRef
    • The effects of interactive E-learning on delirium recognition ability and delirium-related strain of care among critical care nurses
      Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh, Fatemeh Rahnamaei, Soghra Omrani, Shima Haghani
      Journal of the Intensive Care Society.2022; 23(1): 44.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of Delirium Education Programs for Nurses in Acute Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
      Jungyeon Roh, Sujin Shin, Eunmin Hong
      Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2022; 34(5): 435.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Delirium Management Program on Nursing Practice and Nurses' Stress in Comprehensive Nursing Care Service Units
      Ji Hye Kim, Sook Young Kim
      The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing.2019; 22(2): 114.     CrossRef
    • Hospice-Palliative Care Nurses’ Knowledge of Delirium, Self-Efficacy and Nursing Performance on Delirium
      Bo-Jung Jang, Hye-Ah Yeom
      The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2018; 21(2): 65.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Delirium Prevention Interventions for Neurocritical Patients
      Min-Ji Lee, Sun-Hee Yun, Kyoung-Ok Choi, Sun-Suk Seong, Sun-Mi Lee, Jae-Jin Kang
      Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2018; 25(2): 109.     CrossRef
    • An educational programme to improve acute care nurses' knowledge, attitudes and family caregiver involvement in care of people with cognitive impairment
      Yun Kang, Wendy Moyle, Marie Cooke, Siobhan T. O'Dwyer
      Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.2017; 31(3): 631.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Delirium Care Education on Delirium Care of Korean-Chinese Caregivers Caring for Elderly Postsurgical Patients
      Ji Yeon Lee, Juh Hyun Shin
      Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2017; 19(3): 194.     CrossRef
    • Factors Influencing Performance of Delirium Care for Postoperative Delirium of Elderly Patients among Recovery Room Nurses
      Hyunjoo Koo, Jinhyang Yang
      The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education.2016; 22(3): 387.     CrossRef
    • Nurse’s Knowledge, Confidence and Performance on Care for Delirium
      Hyang-mi Park, Mi Young Chang
      Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2016; 41(4): 359.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    The Effects of Delirium Care Training Program for Nurses in Hospital Nursing Units
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(5):489-499.   Published online October 31, 2014
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    The Effects of Delirium Care Training Program for Nurses in Hospital Nursing Units
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(5):489-499.   Published online October 31, 2014
    Close
    The Effects of Delirium Care Training Program for Nurses in Hospital Nursing Units
    The Effects of Delirium Care Training Program for Nurses in Hospital Nursing Units

    Components and Contents of The Delirium Care Training Program

    Components Contents
    Education (1 hour) ․ Provide one hour lecture about the definition, prevalence, characteristics, categories, possible causes, assessment tools, and intervention of delirium.
    ․ Introduce 'delirium assessment tools' and 'checklist for nursing intervention of patients with delirium' and educate how to use the tools and checklists.
    ․ Questions and answers.
    Practical training (4 weeks) Delirium assessment tool ․ Perform the short CAM for every older patient (≥70) who admitted to the floor from the admission date to 7 days after admission.
    ․ Get feedback from charge nurses about the accurate usage of the delirium assessment tool.
    Checklist for preventive nursing care of delirium ․ Perform 'checklist for preventive nursing of delirium' for every older patient (≥70) who admitted to the floor from the admission date to 7 days after admission.
    ․ Share the experience with the principle investigator about the difficulties to perform the checklist, missing items and reasons. Get feedback from the principle investigator about the accurate usage of the checklist.

    Homogeneity of General Characteristics between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)

    Characteristics Categories Exp. (n=64) Cont. (n=67) x2 p
    n (%) n (%)
    Age (year) <25 34 (53.1) 28 (41.8) 4.78 .092
    25~29 25 (39.1) 25 (37.3)
    ≥30 5 (7.8) 14 (20.9)
    Marital status Unmarried 60 (93.8) 57 (85.1) 2.58 .108
    Married 4 (6.3) 10 (14.9)
    Religion Christian 5 (7.8) 7 (10.4) 0.90 .825
    Catholic 2 (3.1) 3 (4.5)
    Buddhist 15 (23.4) 12 (17.9)
    None 42 (65.6) 45 (67.2)
    Educational level Junior college 53 (82.8) 52 (77.6) 0.56 .456
    ≥University 11 (17.2) 15 (22.4)
    Clinical career (year) ≥1~<5 47 (73.4) 50 (74.6) 0.02 .877
    ≥5 17 (26.6) 17 (25.4)
    Department Internal medicine 17 (26.6) 24 (35.8) 8.72 .069
    Orthopedics 34 (53.1) 20 (29.9)
    General surgery 8 (12.5) 11 (16.4)
    Neurology or neurosurgery 4 (6.3) 7 (10.4)
    Other 1 (1.6) 5 (7.5)
    Necessity of delirium education Urgently needed 15 (23.4) 13 (19.4) 4.58 .102
    Needed 47 (73.4) 45 (67.2)
    So so 2 (3.1) 9 (13.4)
    Experience of delirium education Yes 22 (34.4) 29 (43.3) 1.09 .296
    No 42 (65.6) 38 (56.7)
    Ways to get delirium education In hospital 4 (18.2) 4 (13.8) 0.18 .670
    In college 18 (81.8) 25 (86.2)
    Number of education 1 16 (72.7) 18 (66.7) 1.83 .609
    2 3 (13.6) 6 (22.2)
    ≥3 3 (13.6) 3 (11.1)
    Had manuals for delirium care Yes 4 (6.3) 4 (6.0) 0.00 .947
    No 60 (93.8) 63 (94.0)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Homogeneity of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance (N=131)

    Variables Exp. (n=64) Cont. (n=67) t p
    M±SD M±SD
    Total Knowledge of delirium 33.58±3.47 33.30±3.47 0.46 .646
       Etiology 9.19±0.97 8.96±1.15 1.25 .215
       Symptoms 13.64±1.98 13.61±1.85 0.09 .932
       Management 10.75±2.20 10.73±2.24 0.05 .962
    Self-confidence of nursing 49.58±11.44 53.65±14.28 -1.80 .075
    Nursing performance 2.79±0.28 2.89±0.38 -1.56 .121

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Comparison of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)

    Variables Exp. (n=64) Paired t-test (p) Cont. (n=67) Paired t-test (p) Group differences at posttests (p)
    Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest
    M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD
    Total Knowledge of delirium e 33.58±3.47 38.77±2.75 11.62 33.30±3.47 32.84±3.63 -1.06 10.49
        (<.001)     (.295) (<.001)
      Etiology 9.19±0.97 9.63±0.55 3.72 8.96±1.15 8.97±1.13 0.86 4.25
        (<.001)     (.932) (<.001)
      Symptoms 13.64±1.98 15.83±2.03 8.13 13.61±1.85 12.87±1.87 -1.85 8.69
        (<.001)     (.069) (<.001)
      Management t 10.75±2.20 13.31±1.14 9.98 10.73±2.24 11.00±2.15 0.98 7.73
        (<.001)     (.331) (<.001)
    Self-confidence of nursing 49.58±11.44 72.31±7.33 16.67 53.65±14.28   -0.39 9.73
        (<.001)   53.05±14.36 (.695) (<.001)
    Nursing performance 2.79±0.28 3.34±0.35 11.66 2.89±0.38 2.82±0.42 -1.41 7.77
        (<.001)     (.163) (<.001)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Differences in Item by Item Nursing Performance in the Experimental Group (N =64)

    Item Nursing performance Pretest Post-test Differences (Post-Pre) p
    M±SD M±SD
    1 Assess potential risks of delirium 2.19±0.91 2.80±0.89 0.61 <.001
    2 Assess the patient's mental status accurately 3.28±0.68 3.42±0.59 0.14 .151
    3 Talk to the patient repeatedly about date, time, place, people 2.47±0.69 3.38±0.68 0.91 <.001
    4 Explain to the patient before providing nursing care (or treatment) 3.55±0.64 3.72±0.49 0.17 .047
    5 Listen to the words of the patient 3.42±0.66 3.77±0.43 0.34 <.001
    6 Communicate softly in the patient room 3.22±0.72 3.50±0.59 0.28 .013
    7 Perform all nursing activities (or treatment) at the same time during the night 2.81±0.87 3.41±0.60 0.59 <.001
    8 Keep Machines' alarm sounds at minimum 2.78±0.98 3.17±0.63 0.39 .005
    9 Encourage to use eye glasses if visual acuity is impaired 2.88±0.92 3.47±0.59 0.59 <.001
    10 Remove catheters as soon as possible 2.70±0.79 3.08±0.60 0.38 .002
    11 Encourage to use hearing aid and communication tools if needed (ex: word cards) 2.66±0.91 3.31±0.75 0.66 <.001
    12 Perform cognitive stimulation activities (ex: word games, repeated information, provide a clock or calendar) 1.92±0.76 3.14±0.79 1.22 <.001
    13 Avoid restraints 2.16±1.04 3.27±0.93 1.11 <.001
    14 Check the signs of dehydration 2.47±0.69 3.27±0.67 0.80 <.001
    15 Check the triggers, if delirium occurs 2.61±0.66 3.17±0.61 0.56 <.001
    16 Control pain 3.53±0.50 3.78±0.42 0.25 .001
    17 Encourage family members to be with patients at bed side 3.34±0.62 3.61±0.49 0.27 .006
    18 Provide safe environment keeping soft light during the night 3.19±0.61 3.64±0.48 0.45 <.001
    19 Educate the family and caregivers about delirium 2.70±0.85 3.36±0.68 0.66 <.001
    20 Keep the environment clean removing unnecessary objects 2.80±0.72 3.22±0.63 0.42 <.001
    21 Encourage to bring familiar objects or family photos, etc. 1.98±0.85 2.88±0.83 0.89 <.001
    22 Encourage early ambulation 2.67±0.76 3.53±0.59 0.86 <.001
    23 Consult with doctors to reduce the number of medication 2.56±0.91 2.98±0.70 0.42 .001
    Table 1. Components and Contents of The Delirium Care Training Program

    Table 2. Homogeneity of General Characteristics between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Table 3. Homogeneity of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance (N=131)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Table 4. Comparison of Knowledge of Delirium, Self-confidence of Nursing, and Nursing Performance between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=131)

    Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

    Table 5. Differences in Item by Item Nursing Performance in the Experimental Group (N =64)

    TOP