Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Jung-Han Lee; Hee Seung Kim

doi:10.7475/kjan.2014.26.5.533

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Jung-Han Lee¹, Hee Seung Kim²

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2014;26(5):533-542.
Published online: October 31, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.5.533

¹Seoul St. Mary‘s Hospital, Seoul

²College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Kim, Hee Seung College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2258-7408, Fax: +82-2-2258-7772, E-mail: hees@catholic.ac.kr

• Received: March 14, 2014 • Accepted: October 10, 2014

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

290 Views
0 Download
2 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to understand the risk of falling associated with postmenopausal women and to identify the relationships between this risk and factors such as lifestyle, metabolic syndrome, and bone mineral density.
Methods
The sample was 128 postmenopausal women between 50 and 65 from one menopausal clinic in an urban city. The Risk Assessment for Falls Scale Ⅱ, developed by Glydenvand and Reinboth (1982) and adapted by Park Young-Hye (2003), was modified and used for this study.
Results
The average fall-risk score in postmenopausal women was 7.2 out of 33, the fall-risk score associated with lifestyle was higher in women exposed to stress frequently or who favored spicy or salty foods. The fall-risk score associated with metabolic syndrome was higher in groups with HBP or with a waist circumference of 80cm or greater. The fall-risk score in groups with three or more factors of metabolic syndrome was the highest.
Conclusion
The risk of fall in postmenopausal women was higher in groups with only elementary education, unemployed, reported two or more chronic diseases or reported frequent exposure to stress and for women who preferred spicy or salty foods or exhibited three or more factors of metabolic syndrome.
Key Words: Postmenopausal women; Fall risk; Lifestyle; Metabolic syndrome

Table 1.

Fall Risk Scores by Characteristics of the Subjects (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Age (year)		57.1±4.7
Educational level	Elementary school^a	12 (9.4)	10.9±3.2	7.49	.001
	Middle school	10 (7.8)	8.8±2.9
	High school^b	47 (36.7)	6.9±3.3
	≥College^b	59 (46.1)	6.4±3.1
Spouse	Yes	113 (88.3)	7.1±3.5	0.93	.354
Spouse	No	15 (11.7)	8.0±2.8	0.93	.354
Job	Yes	20 (15.6)	4.6±2.4	4.03	.001
Job	No	108 (84.4)	7.7±3.4	4.03	.001
Living with family	Yes	123 (96.1)	7.2±3.4	-0.71	.514
Living with family	No	5 (3.9)	8.2±3.1	-0.71	.514
Menarche (year)		15.2±1.4
Past history	0^a	64 (55.5)	5.7±3.0	25.53	.001
(number of	1^b	46 (35.9)	8.6±2.8
chronic disease^†)	≥2^c	11 (8.6)	11.4±3.0
Hormone therapy	Yes	64 (50.0)	7.6±3.4	-1.27	.207
	No	64 (50.0)	6.8±3.5	-1.27	.207

Note. a, b, c=Different letters are significantly different.

RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

^†Chronic disease: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Abdominal obesity, Hypertriglyceridemia, Low HDL (High-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels in blood.

Table 2.

Fall Risk Factor and Score

Risk factors	Score	Degree of risk factors	n (%)	M±SD
Passed day after discharge	0	No inpatient experience	107 (83.6)	0.2±0.4
	1	More than 15 days	18 (14.1)
	2	From 8 to 14 days	3 (2.3)
	3	Less than 7 days	0 (0.0)
Inpatient	0	None	43 (33.6)	0.7±0.5
	1	Mild-insulting language	80 (62.5)
	2	Moderate screaming, aggressive	5 (3.9)
	3	Severe-needed restraints	0 (0.0)
Depression	0	None	53 (41.4)	0.8±0.8
	1	Fatigue, mild depression	44 (34.4)
	2	Insomnia, anorexia	31 (24.2)
	3	Over 8kg weight loss, ataraxia	0 (0.0)
Anxiety	0	None	81 (63.3)	0.4±0.5
	1	Unstable, insomnia	46 (35.9)
	2	Rapidly speaking, safety demanded	1 (0.8)
	3	Concentrate difficulty	0 (0.0)
Vision	0	Normal	20 (15.6)	1.3±0.7
	1	Wearing glasses	44 (34.4)
	2	Occasionally discomfort	64 (50.0)
	3	Visual disturbance	0 (0.0)
Communication	0	Normal	111 (86.7)	0.1±0.3
	1	Hearing disturbance	17 (13.3)
	2	Speaking disturbance	0 (0.0)
	3	Hearing / speaking disturbance	0 (0.0)
Drug intake	0	None	82 (64.1)	0.5±0.8
	1	Cardiovascular drug	31 (24.2)
	2	Neurological drug	10 (7.8)
	3	Cardiovascular / neurological drug	5 (3.9)
Chronic disease	0	None	50 (39.0)	0.8±0.8
	1	1 type	52 (40.6)
	2	2 types	24 (18.8)
	3	More than 3 types	2 (1.6)
Urinary dysfunction	0	None	60 (46.8)	0.7±0.7
	1	1 type	54 (42.2)
	2	2 types	13 (10.2)
	3	Nocturia, frequancy, urgency	1 (0.8)
Client age (year)	0	Less than 19	0 (0.0)	1.3±0.4
	1	20~60	93 (72.7)
	2	61~74	35 (27.3)
	3	More than 75	0 (0.0)
Fall history	0	None	86 (67.2)	0.4±0.6
	1	Within last 6months	35 (27.3)
	2	Within 1~5 months	6 (4.7)
	3	Last 4 weeks	1 (0.8)
Total score				7.2±3.4
Range				1~33

Note. Each risk factor was scored and M±SD is the average value of total score of 128 people.

Table 3.

Fall Risk Scores by Life Styles (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Weight check (frequency/week)		4.5±6.5
Exercise	Yes	98 (76.6)	7.0±3.2	1.14	.260
Exercise	No	30 (23.4)	7.9±4.0		.260
Exercise time (minutes/week)		126.2±13.7			.641
Intake of health supplements^† (number)	0	30 (23.4)	7.5±4.1	0.56
	1	73 (57.0)	6.9±3.4
	2	18 (14.1)	7.9±2.7
	≥3	7 (5.5)	7.9±2.9
Alcohol (glass/week)		0.6±2.0		1.34	.194
	0	110 (85.9)	7.4±3.3
	≥1	18 (14.1)	6.1±3.9
Stress	No^a	24 (18.7)	5.3±3.4	4.80	.010
	Sometimes	22 (17.2)	7.6±3.6
	Frequently^b	82 (64.1)	7.7±3.2
Fried dishes (frequency/week)		1.0±1.1		0.32	.868
	0	50 (39.1)	7.1±3.6
	1	50 (39.1)	7.4±3.2
	2	18 (14.0)	6.9±4.1
	3	8 (6.2)	7.1±2.9
	5	2 (1.6)	9.5±2.1
Meat or animal fat (frequency/week)		1.1±0.9		0.29	.751
	0	24 (18.8)	6.9±3.1
	1	74 (57.8)	7.4±3.7
	≥2	30 (23.4)	7.0±3.1
Instant food (frequency/week)		0.2±0.4		0.57	.577
	0	19 (14.8)	6.8±3.7
	≥1	109 (85.2)	7.4±3.4
Spicy or salty food (frequency/day)		0.2±0.5		-3.05	.003
	0	102 (79.7)	6.8±3.1
	≥1	26 (20.3)	9.0±4.0

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

^†Health supplements: calcium, vitamin, etc.

Table 4.

Fall Risk Scores by Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Blood pressure (mmHg)	≥130/85	54 (42.2)	8.4±3.3	-3.34	.001
Blood pressure (mmHg)	＜130/85	74 (57.8)	6.4±3.3	-3.34	.001
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)	≥110	23 (18.0)	7.6±3.5	-0.52	.607
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)	＜110	105 (82.0)	7.2±3.4	-0.52	.607
Waist circumstance (cm)		78.2±9.0		-2.06	.041
	≥80	59 (46.1)	7.9±3.6
	＜80	69 (53.9)	6.7±3.2
Triglyceride (mg/dL)		101.4±52.2		-1.85	.066
	≥150	17 (13.3)	8.7±4.4
	＜150	111 (86.7)	7.0±3.2
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)		57.2±12.7		-1.00	.322
	＜50	33 (25.8)	7.0±3.4
	≥50	95 (74.2)	7.8±3.6
Metabolic syndrome risk factors (number)	0^a	30 (23.4)	5.9±3.3	6.12	.001
	1^a	44 (34.4)	7.1±3.1
	2^a ^b	25 (19.5)	6.6±3.1
	≥3^b	29 (22.7)	9.3±3.4

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale.

Table 5.

Fall Risk Scores by Bone Mineral Density (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Lumbar		-1.9±0.9		0.66	.516
	Normal	18 (14.0)	7.2±3.3
	Osteopenia	71 (55.5)	7.5±3.7
	Osteoporosis	39 (30.5)	6.7±3.0
Femoral neck		-2.3±0.7		1.41	.248
	Normal	1 (0.8)	12.0±0.0
	Osteopenia	76 (59.4)	7.0±3.5
	Osteoporosis	51 (39.8)	7.5±3.4
Trochanter		-1.6±0.7		0.30	.739
	Normal	24 (18.8)	6.8±3.9
	Osteopenia	90 (70.3)	7.3±3.4
	Osteoporosis	14 (10.9)	7.6±2.5
Ward's triangle		-2.7±0.7		1.04	.358
	Normal	1 (0.8)	12.0±0.0
	Osteopenia	46 (35.9)	7.3±3.8
	Osteoporosis	81 (63.3)	7.1±3.2
Lowest point		-2.8±0.7		0.66	.419
	Osteopenia	38 (29.7)	7.6±3.8
	Osteoporosis	90 (70.3)	7.0±3.3

RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale.

REFERENCES

Bone Health and Osteoporosis. 2004. A surgeon general report. Washington: US Department of Health Service.
Choi J. Y., Han S. H., Shin A. S., Shin C. S., Park S. K., Cho S. I., et al. 2008;Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis and osteopenia in Korean women: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Menopausal Medicine. 14(1):35–-49.
Choi K. W., Park U. A., Lee I. S.. 2011;Factors influencing the fear of falling according to gender in frail elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 31(3):539–-551.
Fletcher P. C., Berg K., Dalby D. M., Hirdes J. P.. 2009;Risk factors for falling among community-based seniors. Journal of Patient Safety. 5(2):61–-66.
Article
Glydenvand T.. 1984. Falls: The construction and validation of the Risk Assessment for Fall Scale Ⅱ (RAFSⅡ). Unpublished master thesis..Iowa City: University of Iowa.
Harling A., Sompson J. P.. 2008;A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of Tai Chi in reducing falls and fear of falling in older adults. Physical Therapy Reviews. 13(4):237–-248.
Heinze C., Dassen T., Halfens R., Lohrmann C.. 2009;Screening the risk of falls: A general or a specific instrument? Journal of Clinical Nursing. 15:350–-356.
Article
Jang G. J., Jeon E. Y., Kwon B. H.. 2010;Differences of prevalence and Associated factors of falls in community-dwelling older people with hypertension. Journal of Korean Academy of Public Health Nursing. 24(2):302–-310.
Jung J. W., Shin H. C., Park Y. W., Kim C. H., Cheong S. Y., Sung E. J.. 2004;The relationship between metabolic syndrome, stress and depression-among the 35-64 years old clients of comprehensive medical examination center in one university hospital. Korean Journal of Health Promotion. 4(1):10–-16.
Kang T. H., Park Y. K., Kim E. H., Kim S. M., Oh H. J.. 2002;Spinal bone mineral density related YSM in Korean menopausal women. Journal of Korean Academic Family Medicine. 23(2):224–-232.
Kempen G. I., van Haastregt J. C., McKee K. J., Delbaere K., Zijlstra G. A.. 2009;Socio-demographic, health-related and psychosocial correlates of fear of falling and avoidance of activity in community-living older persons who avoid activity due to fear of falling BMC Public Health, 9, 170..http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-170.
Kim C. H., Kim C.. 2008;Effectiveness of a community-based exercise intervention of falls and fall risk factors for reducing risks of osteoporotic fracture. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science. 10(3):81–-90.
Kim E. K., Lee J., Eom M. R.. 2008;Falls risk factors of inpatients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 38(5):676–-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.5.676.
Article
Kim J. M.. 2009. An analysis of falls in the elderly: A PRECEDE model approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul: Ewha Womans University.
Kim M. S.. 2009;Prevalence rate of metabolic syndrome and analysis of dietary behaviors for premenopausal and postmenopausal women Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul: Konkuk University..
Korea National Statistical Office. 2008. Life table. Daejeon: Korea National Statistical Office.
Kuczynski M., Ostrowska B.. 2006;Understanding falls in osteoporosis: The viscoelastic modeling perspective. Gait Posture. 23(1):51–-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.018.
Lee I. S., Ko Y., Lee K. O., Yim E. S.. 2012;Evaluation of the effects of a frailty preventing multi-factorial program concentrated on local communities for high-risk younger and older elderly people. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 23(2):201–-211.
Lee K. J., Park H. S.. 2006;A study on the perceived health status, depression, and activities of daily living for the elderly in urban areas. Korean Journal of Womens Health Nursing. 12(3):221–-230.
Article
PDF
Lee O., Nam H. S., Kong S. A., Kim J. W., Kim C. Z., Kang H. J.. 2010;The relationships between physical activity and immanent fall risk factors in the elderly. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 28(2):95–-102.
Lee S. W., Kim M. R., Kwon D. J., Kim J. H., Kim J. H., You Y. O., et al. 2009;Relationship between metabolic syndrome and bone mineral density in the postmenopausal women. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 52(8):835–-842.
Minister of Health & Welfare. 2001;The Korea Health & Nutrition Examination Survey Seoul, Minister of Health & Welfare..
National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). 2002;Third report of the NCEP expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 106(25):3143–-3421.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. 2001;Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Journal of American Medical Association. 285:785–-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785.
Oh E. J., Joh H. K., Lee R., Do H. J., Oh S. W., Lym Y. L., et al. 2008;Relations between the dietary habits and components of the metabolic syndrome in premenopausal women. Journal of Korean Academy of Family Medicine. 29(10):746–-761.
Park E. K., Ahn W. H., Oh H. W.. 2008;Relationships of hemodynamic variables, dementia, falling related fitness and lower extremity strength in older person with chronic disease. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 34(9):1237–-1246.
Park H. S., Chang R., Park K. Y.. 2008;Comparative study on fall related characteristics between single and recurrent falls in community-dwelling older women. Journal of Korean Academic of Adult Nursing. 20(6):905–-916.
Park S. H.. 2008;Relations among metabolic syndrome, dietary behaviors health-related factors, and serum minerals in Korean adult male Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Soon-chunhyang University, Asan..
Park Y. H.. 2004;Fall risk assessment in the community-dwelling elderly. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing. 6(2):170–-178.
Roux C.. 2001;Can practitioners use the WHO definition for osteoporosis? Joint Bone Spine. 68:10–-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1297-319X(00)00224-4.
Article
Roux C., Priol G., Fechtenbaum J., Colet B., Liu-Leage S., Audran M.. 2007;A clinical tool to determine the necessity of spine radiography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis presenting with back pain. Annals of the Rheumatic Disease. 66:81–-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.051474.
Article
Scheffér A. C., Schuurmans M. J., van Dijk N., van der Hooft T., de Rooij S. E.. 2008;Fear of falling: Measurement strategy, prevalence, risk factors and consequences among older persons. Age and Ageing. 37(1):19–-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm169.
Yoo I. Y.. 2011;Recurrent falls among community dwelling older Koreans. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 37:28–-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20110503-01.
Zijlstra G. A., van Haastregt J. C., van Eijk J. T., van Rossum E., Stalenhoef P. A., Kempen G. I.. 2007;Prevalence and correlates of fear of falling, and associated avoidance of activity in the general population of community-living older people. Age and Ageing. 36:304–-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm021.
Article

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Association between Falls and Nutritional Status of Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Korea
Ah-Ra Jo, Mi-Jeong Park, Byung-Gue Lee, Young-Gyun Seo, Hong-Ji Song, Yu-Jin Paek, Kyung-Hee Park, Hye-Mi Noh
Korean Journal of Family Medicine.2020; 41(2): 111. CrossRef
Comparison of falls-related physical fitness and fall experience characteristics of the elderly between Ulsan, Korea and Gifu, Japan
Sohee Shin
Korean Journal of Sport Science.2017; : 566. CrossRef

Cite

CITE

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(5):533-542. Published online October 31, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.5.533

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(5):533-542. Published online October 31, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.5.533

Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Table 1.

Fall Risk Scores by Characteristics of the Subjects (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Age (year)		57.1±4.7
Educational level	Elementary school^a	12 (9.4)	10.9±3.2	7.49	.001
	Middle school	10 (7.8)	8.8±2.9
	High school^b	47 (36.7)	6.9±3.3
	≥College^b	59 (46.1)	6.4±3.1
Spouse	Yes	113 (88.3)	7.1±3.5	0.93	.354
Spouse	No	15 (11.7)	8.0±2.8	0.93	.354
Job	Yes	20 (15.6)	4.6±2.4	4.03	.001
Job	No	108 (84.4)	7.7±3.4	4.03	.001
Living with family	Yes	123 (96.1)	7.2±3.4	-0.71	.514
Living with family	No	5 (3.9)	8.2±3.1	-0.71	.514
Menarche (year)		15.2±1.4
Past history	0^a	64 (55.5)	5.7±3.0	25.53	.001
(number of	1^b	46 (35.9)	8.6±2.8
chronic disease^†)	≥2^c	11 (8.6)	11.4±3.0
Hormone therapy	Yes	64 (50.0)	7.6±3.4	-1.27	.207
	No	64 (50.0)	6.8±3.5	-1.27	.207

Note. a, b, c=Different letters are significantly different.

RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

^†Chronic disease: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Abdominal obesity, Hypertriglyceridemia, Low HDL (High-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels in blood.

Table 2.

Fall Risk Factor and Score

Risk factors	Score	Degree of risk factors	n (%)	M±SD
Passed day after discharge	0	No inpatient experience	107 (83.6)	0.2±0.4
	1	More than 15 days	18 (14.1)
	2	From 8 to 14 days	3 (2.3)
	3	Less than 7 days	0 (0.0)
Inpatient	0	None	43 (33.6)	0.7±0.5
	1	Mild-insulting language	80 (62.5)
	2	Moderate screaming, aggressive	5 (3.9)
	3	Severe-needed restraints	0 (0.0)
Depression	0	None	53 (41.4)	0.8±0.8
	1	Fatigue, mild depression	44 (34.4)
	2	Insomnia, anorexia	31 (24.2)
	3	Over 8kg weight loss, ataraxia	0 (0.0)
Anxiety	0	None	81 (63.3)	0.4±0.5
	1	Unstable, insomnia	46 (35.9)
	2	Rapidly speaking, safety demanded	1 (0.8)
	3	Concentrate difficulty	0 (0.0)
Vision	0	Normal	20 (15.6)	1.3±0.7
	1	Wearing glasses	44 (34.4)
	2	Occasionally discomfort	64 (50.0)
	3	Visual disturbance	0 (0.0)
Communication	0	Normal	111 (86.7)	0.1±0.3
	1	Hearing disturbance	17 (13.3)
	2	Speaking disturbance	0 (0.0)
	3	Hearing / speaking disturbance	0 (0.0)
Drug intake	0	None	82 (64.1)	0.5±0.8
	1	Cardiovascular drug	31 (24.2)
	2	Neurological drug	10 (7.8)
	3	Cardiovascular / neurological drug	5 (3.9)
Chronic disease	0	None	50 (39.0)	0.8±0.8
	1	1 type	52 (40.6)
	2	2 types	24 (18.8)
	3	More than 3 types	2 (1.6)
Urinary dysfunction	0	None	60 (46.8)	0.7±0.7
	1	1 type	54 (42.2)
	2	2 types	13 (10.2)
	3	Nocturia, frequancy, urgency	1 (0.8)
Client age (year)	0	Less than 19	0 (0.0)	1.3±0.4
	1	20~60	93 (72.7)
	2	61~74	35 (27.3)
	3	More than 75	0 (0.0)
Fall history	0	None	86 (67.2)	0.4±0.6
	1	Within last 6months	35 (27.3)
	2	Within 1~5 months	6 (4.7)
	3	Last 4 weeks	1 (0.8)
Total score				7.2±3.4
Range				1~33

Note. Each risk factor was scored and M±SD is the average value of total score of 128 people.

Table 3.

Fall Risk Scores by Life Styles (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Weight check (frequency/week)		4.5±6.5
Exercise	Yes	98 (76.6)	7.0±3.2	1.14	.260
Exercise	No	30 (23.4)	7.9±4.0		.260
Exercise time (minutes/week)		126.2±13.7			.641
Intake of health supplements^† (number)	0	30 (23.4)	7.5±4.1	0.56
	1	73 (57.0)	6.9±3.4
	2	18 (14.1)	7.9±2.7
	≥3	7 (5.5)	7.9±2.9
Alcohol (glass/week)		0.6±2.0		1.34	.194
	0	110 (85.9)	7.4±3.3
	≥1	18 (14.1)	6.1±3.9
Stress	No^a	24 (18.7)	5.3±3.4	4.80	.010
	Sometimes	22 (17.2)	7.6±3.6
	Frequently^b	82 (64.1)	7.7±3.2
Fried dishes (frequency/week)		1.0±1.1		0.32	.868
	0	50 (39.1)	7.1±3.6
	1	50 (39.1)	7.4±3.2
	2	18 (14.0)	6.9±4.1
	3	8 (6.2)	7.1±2.9
	5	2 (1.6)	9.5±2.1
Meat or animal fat (frequency/week)		1.1±0.9		0.29	.751
	0	24 (18.8)	6.9±3.1
	1	74 (57.8)	7.4±3.7
	≥2	30 (23.4)	7.0±3.1
Instant food (frequency/week)		0.2±0.4		0.57	.577
	0	19 (14.8)	6.8±3.7
	≥1	109 (85.2)	7.4±3.4
Spicy or salty food (frequency/day)		0.2±0.5		-3.05	.003
	0	102 (79.7)	6.8±3.1
	≥1	26 (20.3)	9.0±4.0

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

^†Health supplements: calcium, vitamin, etc.

Table 4.

Fall Risk Scores by Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Blood pressure (mmHg)	≥130/85	54 (42.2)	8.4±3.3	-3.34	.001
Blood pressure (mmHg)	＜130/85	74 (57.8)	6.4±3.3	-3.34	.001
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)	≥110	23 (18.0)	7.6±3.5	-0.52	.607
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)	＜110	105 (82.0)	7.2±3.4	-0.52	.607
Waist circumstance (cm)		78.2±9.0		-2.06	.041
	≥80	59 (46.1)	7.9±3.6
	＜80	69 (53.9)	6.7±3.2
Triglyceride (mg/dL)		101.4±52.2		-1.85	.066
	≥150	17 (13.3)	8.7±4.4
	＜150	111 (86.7)	7.0±3.2
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)		57.2±12.7		-1.00	.322
	＜50	33 (25.8)	7.0±3.4
	≥50	95 (74.2)	7.8±3.6
Metabolic syndrome risk factors (number)	0^a	30 (23.4)	5.9±3.3	6.12	.001
	1^a	44 (34.4)	7.1±3.1
	2^a ^b	25 (19.5)	6.6±3.1
	≥3^b	29 (22.7)	9.3±3.4

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale.

Table 5.

Fall Risk Scores by Bone Mineral Density (N=128)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	RAFS II score	t or F	p
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Lumbar		-1.9±0.9		0.66	.516
	Normal	18 (14.0)	7.2±3.3
	Osteopenia	71 (55.5)	7.5±3.7
	Osteoporosis	39 (30.5)	6.7±3.0
Femoral neck		-2.3±0.7		1.41	.248
	Normal	1 (0.8)	12.0±0.0
	Osteopenia	76 (59.4)	7.0±3.5
	Osteoporosis	51 (39.8)	7.5±3.4
Trochanter		-1.6±0.7		0.30	.739
	Normal	24 (18.8)	6.8±3.9
	Osteopenia	90 (70.3)	7.3±3.4
	Osteoporosis	14 (10.9)	7.6±2.5
Ward's triangle		-2.7±0.7		1.04	.358
	Normal	1 (0.8)	12.0±0.0
	Osteopenia	46 (35.9)	7.3±3.8
	Osteoporosis	81 (63.3)	7.1±3.2
Lowest point		-2.8±0.7		0.66	.419
	Osteopenia	38 (29.7)	7.6±3.8
	Osteoporosis	90 (70.3)	7.0±3.3

RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale.

Table 1. Fall Risk Scores by Characteristics of the Subjects (N=128)

Note. a, b, c=Different letters are significantly different.

RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

†

Chronic disease: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Abdominal obesity, Hypertriglyceridemia, Low HDL (High-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels in blood.

Table 2. Fall Risk Factor and Score

Note. Each risk factor was scored and M±SD is the average value of total score of 128 people.

Table 3. Fall Risk Scores by Life Styles (N=128)

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale;

†

Health supplements: calcium, vitamin, etc.

Table 4. Fall Risk Scores by Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors (N=128)

Note. a, b=Different letters are significantly different. RAFS=Risk Assessment for Falls Scale.

Articles

Page Path

Fall Risk related Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Full Article

Abstract

REFERENCES

Figure & Data

References

Citations

CITE

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

Table 4.

Table 5.

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

EDITORIAL POLICY

FOR CONTRIBUTORS