• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Relationship between Non-technical Skills and Resuscitation Performance of Nurses' Team in in-situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2015;27(2):146-155.
Published online: April 30, 2015

1Division of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, HallymUniversity, Chuncheon

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Kim, Eun Jung Division of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University, 1 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea. Tel: +82-33-248-2725, Fax: +82-33-248-2734, E-mail: ejerkim@hallym.ac.kr
• Received: November 20, 2014   • Accepted: March 27, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 22 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 5 Crossref
  • 5 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    The aim of this descriptive study was to explore the relationship between non-technical skills (NTSs) andcardiopulmonaryresuscitation(CPR)performanceof nurses' teams insimulatedcardiacarrest inthehospital.
  • Methods
    Thesample was 28teams of nurses inoneuniversity hospital located in Seoul. A high fidelity simulator was used toenact simulated cardiacarrest. The nurse teams were scored by raters using both the CPR performance checklist and the NTSs checklist. Specifically the CPR performance checklist included critical actions; time elapsed to initiation of critical actions, and quality of cardiac compression. The NTSs checklist was comprised of leadership, communication, mutual performance monitoring, maintenance of guideline, and task management. Data were collected directly from manikin and video recordings.
  • Results
    There was a significant difference between the medians of the NTSs and CPR performance (Mann WhitneyU=43.5, p=.014). In five subcategories, communication (p=.026), mutual performance monitoring (p=.005), and maintenance of guideline (p=.003) dif-feredsignificantlywithCPR performance inmedians. Leadership(p=.053) andtaskmanagement (p=.080) were not significantlydifferent withCPR performance.
  • Conclusion
    Thefindings indicate that NTSsof teams inaddition to technical skills of individual rescuers affect the outcome of CPR. NTSs development andassessment should be considered an integral part of resuscitation training.
Table 1.
Nurses' CPR Performance Scales
Items Critical action Range of scores Scale
0 1 2 3
Assessment Check unresponsiveness 0~1 no yes        
Call for help 0~1 no yes  
Check pulse 0~1 no yes  
Start CPR Time to initiate chest compression 0~2 60 sec > 30~60 sec 30 sec <
Apply back board 0~2 no incorrect correct
Initiate BVM ventilation 0~2 no incorrect correct
Connect to oxygen 0~2 no incorrect correct
Quality of CPR Mean rate of correct compression rate (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
Mean rate of correct placement of hands (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
Mean rate of correct compression depth (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
Mean rate of full chest recoil (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
30 compression and 2 ventilation 0~2 NC or BVM incorrect correct
Hands off time 0~2 2 min > 1~2 min 1 min <
Defibrillation Check ECG rhythm 0~2 no incorrect correct
Give a shock (defibrillation) 0, 2 no   yes
Select a shock energy and charge 0~1 no or incorrect correct  
Place the defibrillator paddle in AP 0~1 no yes  
Clear the victim before delivering a shock 0~1 no yes  
Time to deliver first shock 0~2 no shock 2min > 2 min <
Drug Administer epinephrine 0~1 no yes  

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; NC=no compression; AP=appropriate position;

Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

Table 2.
Non-technical Skills Rating during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)
Variables Behavior marker None Incomplete or untimely Complete & timely
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Leadership Clearly identified in team   2 (7.1) 12 (42.9) 14 (50.0)
Communicate efficiently  6 (21.4) 15 (53.6)  7 (25.0)
Delegate (distribute) tasks  6 (21.4) 12 (42.9)  10 (35.7)
Manage workload and resource 11 (39.3) 4 (14.3)  13 (46.4)
Communication Use closed loop communication (check-back)  9 (32.1) 5 (17.9)  13 (46.4) 
Call for help appropriate/think out loudly 8 (28.6) 7 (25.0)  13 (46.4) 
Mutual performance monitoring Unnecessary hand-off time corrected 19 (67.9) 4 (14.3)  5 (17.9) 
Hyper- or hypoventilation corrected  23 (82.1) 3 (10.7)  2 (7.1) 
Check & speak out the rhythm   8 (28.6) 5 (17.9)  15 (53.6) 
Knowledge sharing, situation monitoring 12 (42.9) 5 (17.9)  11 (39.3) 
Maintaining of standards and guideline Defibrillation is performed safely  10 (35.7) 5 (17.9)  13 (46.4) 
Change person performing chest compression 7 (25.0) 4 (14.3)  17 (60.7) 
every 2 min.       
Ensuring cardiac rhythm after 5 cycles 9 (32.1) 7 (25.0)  12 (42.9) 
Task management Back-up behavior provided as needed
(support other team members)
2 (7.1) 7 (25.0)  19 (67.9) 
All team members contribute with behavior 2 (7.1) 3 (10.7)  23 (82.1) 
Table 3.
Nurses' CPR Performance Scores during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)
Variables Critical action Scale M±SD (possible range)
0 1 2 3
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Assessment Check unresponsiveness 0 (0.0) 28 (100.0)   2.50±0.58
Call for help 1 (3.6) 27 (96.4) (0~3)
Check pulse 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)
Start CPR Time to initiate chest compression 3 (10.7) 5 (17.9) 20 (71.4)   5.57±1.83
Apply back board 6 (21.4) 7 (25.0) 15 (53.6) (0~8)
Initiate BVM ventilation 1 (3.6) 16 (57.2) 11 (39.3)
Connect to oxygen 9 (32.1) 1 (3.6) 18 (64.3)
Quality of CPR Mean rate of correct compression rate (%) 5 (17.9) 21 (75.0) 3 (10.7) 4 (14.3) 11.28±1.36
Mean rate of correct placement of hands (%)   4 (14.3) 7 (25.0) 17 (60.7) (0~16)
Mean rate of correct compression depth (%)   13 (46.4) 9 (32.1) 6 (21.4)
Mean rate of full chest recoil (%)   6 (21.4) 22 (78.6) 28 (100.0)
30 compression and 2 ventilation   21 (75.0) 2 (7.1)  
Hands off time        
Defibrillation Check ECG rhythm 7 (25.0) 6 (21.4) 15 (53.6)   6.07±3.05
Give a shock (defibrillation) 5 (17.9) 21 (75.0) 23 (82.1) (0~9)
Select a shock energy and charge 7 (25.0) 20 (71.4)  
Place the defibrillator paddle in AP 8 (28.6) 20 (71.4)
Clear the victim before delivering a shock 8 (28.6) 23 (82.1)
Time to deliver first shock 5 (17.9)  
Drug Administer epinephrine 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)   NA
Total scores 27.32±4.59

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; AP=appropriate position; NA=not applicable;

Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

Table 4.
Association NTSs and CPR Performance during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)
Variables Groups CPR performance
Median (IQR)
Mann-
Whitney U
Z p
Total NTSs Better (n=16) 29.5 (27.0~31.8) 43.5 -2.447 .014
Worse (n=12) 25.0 (23.0~28.8)
Leadership Better (n=14) 29.5 (26.8~31.3) 56.0 -1.938 .053
Worse (n=14) 25.5 (22.8~29.3)
Communication Better (n=15) 30.0 (27.0~32.0) 49.5 -2.220 .026
Worse (n=13) 26.0 (24.0~28.5)
Mutual performance monitoring Better (n=18) 30.0 (26.75~32.0) 31.5 -2.816 .005
Worse (n=10) 25.0 (21.5~28.3)
Maintaining of standards and guideline Better (n=17) 30.0 (27.0~32.0) 30.5 -2.975 .003
Worse (n=11) 25.0 (23.0~28.0)
Task management Better (n=19) 29.0 (25.0~32.0) 50.0 -1.753 .080
Worse (n=9) 26.0 (21.0~29.0)

NTSs=non-technical skills; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; IQR=interquartile range.

  • 1.Marsch SC, Tschan F, Semmer N, Spychiger M, Breuer M, Hunziker PR. Performance of first responders in simulated cardiac arrests. Critical Care Medicine. 2005;33(5):963-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000157750.43459.07.
  • 2.Hunziker S, Johansson AC, Tschan F, Semmer NK, Rock L, Howell MD, et al. Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;57(24):2381-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.017.
  • 3.Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O'Hearn N, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;293(3):305-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.3.305.
  • 4.Einav S, Shleifer A, Kark JD, Landesberge G, Matot I. Performance of department staff in the window between discovery of collapse to cardiac arrest team arrival. Resuscitation. 2006;69(2):213-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.015.
  • 5.Hunt EA, Walker AR, Shaffner DH, Miller MR, Pronovost PJ. Simulation of in-hospital pediatric medical emergencies and cardiopulmonary arrests: highlighting the importance of the first 5 minutes. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0029.
  • 6.Marsch SC, Muller C, Marquardt K, Conrad G, Tschan F, Hun-ziker PR. Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests. Resuscitation. 2004;60(1):51-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.004.
  • 7.Flin R, Maran N. Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams inacutemedicine. Quality andSafety inHealthCare. 2004;13:i80-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009993.
  • 8.Mitchell L, Flin R. Non-technicalskills ofthe operating theatre scrub nurse: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;63(1):15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04695.x.
  • 9.Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, Paterson-Brown S. Non-technicalskills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery. 2006;139(2):140-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.017.
  • 10.Fletcher G, McGeorge P, Flin R, Glavin R, Maran N. Anaesthetists'non-technical skills(ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003;90(5):580-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg112.
  • 11.Andersen P, Jensen MK, Lippert A, O/stergaard D. Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams. Resuscitation. 2010;81(6):695-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.024.
  • 12.Walker S, Brett S, McKay A, Lambden S, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Observation skill-based clinical assessment tool for resuscitation (OSCAR): development and validation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(7):835-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.009.
  • 13.Cooper S, Cant R, Porter J. Rating emergency teamwork performance development of the team emergency assessment mea-sure(TEAM). Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):446-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.027.
  • 14.Kim JY, Jun SS, Kim DH, Choi SS. Knowledge and attitude toward BLS and provided CPR education among nurses at general wards in Pusan. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental Nursing. 2008;15(2):143-52.
  • 15.Oh SI, Han SS. A study on the sustainable effects of reeducation on cardiopulmonary resuscitation on nurses'knowledge and skills. Journal of Korean Academic Nursing. 2008;38(3):383-92.
  • 16.Park JS, Jeon HR. The effect of basic life support education using a standardized basic life support video program in nurses' cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge, attitude and performance. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2010;16(2):301-11.
  • 17.Pyo MY, Kim JY, Sohn JO, Lee ES, Kim HS, Kim KO, et al. The effects of an advanced cardiac life support training via smart phone's simulation application on nurses' knowledge and learning satisfaction. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2012;18(2):228-38.
  • 18.Basic life support for healthcare providers. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2010.
  • 19.Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-5.
  • 20.Kim EJ, Lee KR, Lee MH, Kim JY. Nurses' cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during the first 5 minutes in in-situ simulated cardiac arrest. Journal of Korean Academic Nursing. 2010;42(3):361-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.3.361.
  • 21.Hunziker S, Buhlmann C, Tschan F, Balestra G, Legeret C, Schumacher C, et al. Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38(4):1086-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf7383̈.
  • 22.Siassakos D, Bristowe K, Draycott TJ, Angouri J, Hambly H, Winter C, et al. Clinical efficiency in a simulated emergency and relationship to team behaviours: a multisite cross-sectional study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011;118(5):596-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02843.x.
  • 23.Yeung JH, Ong GJ, Davies RP, Gao F, Perkins GD. Factors affecting team leadership skills and their relationship with quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40(9):2617-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182591fda.
  • 24.Cooper SJR, Wakelam A. Leadership of resuscitation teams: “lighthouse leadership.” Resuscitation. 1999;42(1):27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00080-5.
  • 25.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Team strategies & tools to enhance performance and patient safety [Internet] U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [cited 2014 June 23]. Available from:.http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/essentials/pocketguide.pdf.
  • 26.Gilligan P, Bhatarcharjee C, Knight G, Smith M, Hegarty D, Shenton A, et al. To lead or not to lead?: prospective control-ledstudyofemergencynurses' provision of advanced life support team leadership. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2005;22(9):628-32.
  • 27.Norris EM, Lockey AS. Human factors in resuscitation teaching. Resuscitation. 2012;83(4):423-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.001.
  • 28.Chan PS, Krumholz HM, Nichol G, Nallamothu BK. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(1):9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706467.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effects of communication team training on clinical competence in Korean Advanced Life Support: A randomized controlled trial
      Soyeon Yun, Hyeoun‐Ae Park, Sang‐Hoon Na, Hee Je Yun
      Nursing & Health Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Review article: Use of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure in the rating of emergency teams' non‐technical skills: A mapping review
      Simon Cooper, Clifford Connell, Robyn Cant
      Emergency Medicine Australasia.2023; 35(3): 375.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Korean Advanced Life Support Education on Non-Technical and Technical Skills of Nursing Students: A Pilot Study
      Yon Hee Seo, Kyong Ah Cho
      Healthcare.2021; 9(10): 1253.     CrossRef
    • Effect of simulation-based emergency cardiac arrest education on nursing students' self-efficacy and critical thinking skills: Roleplay versus lecture
      Eunsook Kim
      Nurse Education Today.2018; 61: 258.     CrossRef
    • Attitudes and Type Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among Hospital Nurses in Emergency Room and Intensive Care Units
      Eun-Ho Ha, Kyoung-Soon Hyun
      Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2017; 29(5): 484.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Relationship between Non-technical Skills and Resuscitation Performance of Nurses' Team in in-situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015;27(2):146-155.   Published online April 30, 2015
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Relationship between Non-technical Skills and Resuscitation Performance of Nurses' Team in in-situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015;27(2):146-155.   Published online April 30, 2015
    Close
    Relationship between Non-technical Skills and Resuscitation Performance of Nurses' Team in in-situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest
    Relationship between Non-technical Skills and Resuscitation Performance of Nurses' Team in in-situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest

    Nurses' CPR Performance Scales

    Items Critical action Range of scores Scale
    0 1 2 3
    Assessment Check unresponsiveness 0~1 no yes        
    Call for help 0~1 no yes  
    Check pulse 0~1 no yes  
    Start CPR Time to initiate chest compression 0~2 60 sec > 30~60 sec 30 sec <
    Apply back board 0~2 no incorrect correct
    Initiate BVM ventilation 0~2 no incorrect correct
    Connect to oxygen 0~2 no incorrect correct
    Quality of CPR Mean rate of correct compression rate (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
    Mean rate of correct placement of hands (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
    Mean rate of correct compression depth (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
    Mean rate of full chest recoil (%) 0~3 NC 50% < 50~80% 80% >
    30 compression and 2 ventilation 0~2 NC or BVM incorrect correct
    Hands off time 0~2 2 min > 1~2 min 1 min <
    Defibrillation Check ECG rhythm 0~2 no incorrect correct
    Give a shock (defibrillation) 0, 2 no   yes
    Select a shock energy and charge 0~1 no or incorrect correct  
    Place the defibrillator paddle in AP 0~1 no yes  
    Clear the victim before delivering a shock 0~1 no yes  
    Time to deliver first shock 0~2 no shock 2min > 2 min <
    Drug Administer epinephrine 0~1 no yes  

    CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; NC=no compression; AP=appropriate position;

    Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

    Non-technical Skills Rating during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    Variables Behavior marker None Incomplete or untimely Complete & timely
    n (%) n (%) n (%)
    Leadership Clearly identified in team   2 (7.1) 12 (42.9) 14 (50.0)
    Communicate efficiently  6 (21.4) 15 (53.6)  7 (25.0)
    Delegate (distribute) tasks  6 (21.4) 12 (42.9)  10 (35.7)
    Manage workload and resource 11 (39.3) 4 (14.3)  13 (46.4)
    Communication Use closed loop communication (check-back)  9 (32.1) 5 (17.9)  13 (46.4) 
    Call for help appropriate/think out loudly 8 (28.6) 7 (25.0)  13 (46.4) 
    Mutual performance monitoring Unnecessary hand-off time corrected 19 (67.9) 4 (14.3)  5 (17.9) 
    Hyper- or hypoventilation corrected  23 (82.1) 3 (10.7)  2 (7.1) 
    Check & speak out the rhythm   8 (28.6) 5 (17.9)  15 (53.6) 
    Knowledge sharing, situation monitoring 12 (42.9) 5 (17.9)  11 (39.3) 
    Maintaining of standards and guideline Defibrillation is performed safely  10 (35.7) 5 (17.9)  13 (46.4) 
    Change person performing chest compression 7 (25.0) 4 (14.3)  17 (60.7) 
    every 2 min.       
    Ensuring cardiac rhythm after 5 cycles 9 (32.1) 7 (25.0)  12 (42.9) 
    Task management Back-up behavior provided as needed
    (support other team members)
    2 (7.1) 7 (25.0)  19 (67.9) 
    All team members contribute with behavior 2 (7.1) 3 (10.7)  23 (82.1) 

    Nurses' CPR Performance Scores during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    Variables Critical action Scale M±SD (possible range)
    0 1 2 3
    n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
    Assessment Check unresponsiveness 0 (0.0) 28 (100.0)   2.50±0.58
    Call for help 1 (3.6) 27 (96.4) (0~3)
    Check pulse 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)
    Start CPR Time to initiate chest compression 3 (10.7) 5 (17.9) 20 (71.4)   5.57±1.83
    Apply back board 6 (21.4) 7 (25.0) 15 (53.6) (0~8)
    Initiate BVM ventilation 1 (3.6) 16 (57.2) 11 (39.3)
    Connect to oxygen 9 (32.1) 1 (3.6) 18 (64.3)
    Quality of CPR Mean rate of correct compression rate (%) 5 (17.9) 21 (75.0) 3 (10.7) 4 (14.3) 11.28±1.36
    Mean rate of correct placement of hands (%)   4 (14.3) 7 (25.0) 17 (60.7) (0~16)
    Mean rate of correct compression depth (%)   13 (46.4) 9 (32.1) 6 (21.4)
    Mean rate of full chest recoil (%)   6 (21.4) 22 (78.6) 28 (100.0)
    30 compression and 2 ventilation   21 (75.0) 2 (7.1)  
    Hands off time        
    Defibrillation Check ECG rhythm 7 (25.0) 6 (21.4) 15 (53.6)   6.07±3.05
    Give a shock (defibrillation) 5 (17.9) 21 (75.0) 23 (82.1) (0~9)
    Select a shock energy and charge 7 (25.0) 20 (71.4)  
    Place the defibrillator paddle in AP 8 (28.6) 20 (71.4)
    Clear the victim before delivering a shock 8 (28.6) 23 (82.1)
    Time to deliver first shock 5 (17.9)  
    Drug Administer epinephrine 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)   NA
    Total scores 27.32±4.59

    CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; AP=appropriate position; NA=not applicable;

    Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

    Association NTSs and CPR Performance during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    Variables Groups CPR performance
    Median (IQR)
    Mann-
    Whitney U
    Z p
    Total NTSs Better (n=16) 29.5 (27.0~31.8) 43.5 -2.447 .014
    Worse (n=12) 25.0 (23.0~28.8)
    Leadership Better (n=14) 29.5 (26.8~31.3) 56.0 -1.938 .053
    Worse (n=14) 25.5 (22.8~29.3)
    Communication Better (n=15) 30.0 (27.0~32.0) 49.5 -2.220 .026
    Worse (n=13) 26.0 (24.0~28.5)
    Mutual performance monitoring Better (n=18) 30.0 (26.75~32.0) 31.5 -2.816 .005
    Worse (n=10) 25.0 (21.5~28.3)
    Maintaining of standards and guideline Better (n=17) 30.0 (27.0~32.0) 30.5 -2.975 .003
    Worse (n=11) 25.0 (23.0~28.0)
    Task management Better (n=19) 29.0 (25.0~32.0) 50.0 -1.753 .080
    Worse (n=9) 26.0 (21.0~29.0)

    NTSs=non-technical skills; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; IQR=interquartile range.

    Table 1. Nurses' CPR Performance Scales

    CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; NC=no compression; AP=appropriate position;

    Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

    Table 2. Non-technical Skills Rating during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    Table 3. Nurses' CPR Performance Scores during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; BVM=bag valve mask; ECG=electrocardiography; AP=appropriate position; NA=not applicable;

    Total compression interruption time during 5 minutes.

    Table 4. Association NTSs and CPR Performance during 5 minutes Simulated Cardiac Arrest (N=28)

    NTSs=non-technical skills; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; IQR=interquartile range.

    TOP