• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

Korean J Adult Nurs : Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button
Search
Advanced Search
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale-Korean: Validity and Reliability

Insook Kim, Ph.D., RN1, Hyoungshim Choi, Ph.D., RN2, Yeongyi Yim, MSN, RN3, Seonae Won, MSN, RN3, Jungwoo Kim, BSN, RN4, Sanga Lee, MSN, RN5
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2016;28(6):646-658.
Published online: December 31, 2016

1Professor, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

2Researcher, Institute of Health · Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

3Doctoral Student, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

4Nurse, Yousei University Health System, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

5Doctoral Student, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, MA, USA.

Corresponding author: Choi, Hyoungshim. Institute of Health · Environment, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea. Tel: +82-2-880-2750, Fax: +82-2-877-2750, hyoungshim@daum.net
• Received: September 27, 2016   • Revised: November 22, 2016   • Accepted: December 1, 2016

© 2016 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 22 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 11 Crossref
  • 10 Scopus
prev next

Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF
  • Purpose
    The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL-K) scale. The scale measures the reported quality of the nurse' work life among Korean nurses.
  • Methods
    The QNWL-K was developed through forward-backward translation techniques. An internal consistency reliability and construct validity using exploratory analysis were conducted using SPSS/WIN (21.0). Survey data were collected from 309 nurses who worked in two tertiary hospitals, four general hospitals, and two hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi, South Korea.
  • Results
    Factor analysis results of the revised QWNL-K demonstrated that it has a four-factor structure (work context, support systems for home/work life, work design, and staffing) that supports construct validity. Factor loadings of the 36 items ranged from .30~.77. The QNWL-K showed reliable internal consistency from Cronbach's α for the total scale of .93.
  • Conclusion
    The findings support that the QNWL-K has satisfactory construct validity and is a reliable measure of nursing work life in Korea.
  • Key Words: Quality of work life; Nurses; Reliability; Validity; Factor analysis

This work was supported by Yonsei University College of Nursing 2015.

  • 1. Joung MS, Kim KJ. A study on the effect of emotional labor and leader's emotional intelligence on job satisfaction and organizational commitment for nurses. Korean J Hosp Manag. 2006;11(4):1-18.
  • 2. Fujimoto T, Kotani S, Suzuki R. Work-family conflict of nurses in Japan. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(24):3286-3295.
  • 3. Park KO, Kim SY, Kim JK. Hospital nurses' experience of bullying in the workplace and burnout, organizational commitment, turnover intention and nursing productivity. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2013;19(2):169-180.
  • 4. Mosadeghrad AM, Ferlie E, Rosenberg D. A study of relationship between job stress, quality of working life and turnover intention among hospital employees. Health Serv Manage Res. 2011;24(4):170-181.
  • 5. Sirgy MJ, Reilly NP, Wu J, Efraty D. A work-life identity model of well-being: towards a research agenda linking quality-ofwork-life (QWL) programs with quality of life (QOL). Appl Res Qual Life. 2008;3(3):181-202.
  • 6. Brooks BA, Storfjell J, Omoike O, Ohlson S, Stemler I, Shaver J, et al. Assessing the quality of nursing work life. Nurs Adm Q. 2007;31(2):152-157.
  • 7. Gurses AP, Carayon P, Wall M. Impact of performance obstacles on intensive care nurses' workload, perceived quality and safety of care, and quality of working life. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:422-443.
  • 8. Brooks BA, Anderson MA. Defining quality of nursing work life. Nurs Econ. 2005;23(6):319-326.
  • 9. O'Brien-Pallas L, Baumann A. Quality of nursing work life issues-a unifying framework. Can J Nurs Adm. 1992;5(2):12-16.
  • 10. Mohamad M, Mohamad WN. A model of quality of work life, life satisfaction and service quality. Asian J Bus Res. 2012;2(2):38-51.
  • 11. Brooks BA. Development of an instrument to measure quality of nursing work life [dissertation]. Chicago: University of Illinois; 2001.
  • 12. Kim MJ, Ryu EJ. Structural equation modeling of quality of work life in clinical nurses based on the Culture-Work-Health Model. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(6):879-889.
  • 13. Fu X, Xu J, Song L, Li H, Wang J, Wu X, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the quality of nursing work life scale. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0121150.
  • 14. Lee YW, Dai YT, McCreary LL, Yao G, Brooks BA. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version quality of nursing work life scale. Nurs Health Sci. 2014;16(3):298-306.
  • 15. McCloskey JC, McCain BE. Satisfaction, commitment and professionalism of newly employed nurses. Image J Nurs Sch. 1987;19(1):20-24.
  • 16. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2013. p. 644-646.
  • 17. Brooks BA, Anderson MA. Nursing work life in acute care. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(3):269-275.
  • 18. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [internet] Geneva: WHO; 2016;cited 2015 May 15. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
  • 19. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382-385.
  • 20. Lee CY. Advanced nursing statistics. 1st ed. Seoul: Soomoonsa; 2016. p. 189-196.
  • 21. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. p. 167-196.
  • 22. Um MY, Cho SW. Scale development in social work practice. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2005. p. 97-108.
  • 23. Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(3):393-416.
  • 24. Lee EO, Lim NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae JI, et al. Nurs Res Stat. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2009. p. 197-205.
  • 25. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-657.
  • 26. Sirin M, Sokmen SM. Quality of nursing work life scale: the psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version. Int J Caring Sci. 2015;8(3):543-554.
  • 27. Lee JM, Bae DH, Woo JM. Revision of the mental fitness scale: validation and confirmatory factor analysis. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2013;52(6):431-441.
  • 28. Kim MJ. Structuring equation modeling of quality of work life in clinical nurse based on the culture-work-health model [dissertation]. Seoul: Chung Ang University; 2015.
  • 29. Nannally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGrow-Hill; 1978. p. 195.
  • 30. Alalki MJ, FitzGerald G, Clark M. Quality of work life among primary health care nurses in the Jazan region, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10(1):1-13.
Table 1

Characteristics of Nurse Participants (N=309)

kjan-28-646-i001.jpg
Table 2

Item Analysis (N=309)

kjan-28-646-i002.jpg

†Excluded items due to lower corrected item-total correlation; UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel, RN=registered nurse, MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education program.

Table 3

Factor Loading from Exploratory Factor Analysis for QNWL (N=309)

kjan-28-646-i003.jpg

UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel; RN=registered nurse; MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education.

Table 4

Reliability for QNWL and Mean Score for Each Item (N=309)

kjan-28-646-i004.jpg

QNWL=quality of nursing work life.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Assessing the Development and Validity of Educational Videos in Educating Dental Infection Control Coordinators
      Na‐Young Lee, Han‐Na Kim
      International Journal of Dental Hygiene.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Influences of Organizational Culture, Nursing Workplace Spirituality, and Nurses’ Perceived Health Status on Quality of Nursing Work Life according to Nursing Clinical Ladder
      Hyun Sook Lee, Ju Hyun Jin, Ju Ri Lee, Hye Jin Kim, Yeon Jae Jung
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2024; 30(1): 31.     CrossRef
    • The Effects of Disaster Nursing Core Competence and Coping Flexibility on the Quality of Work Life of Emergency Room Nurses during Long COVID-19
      Yu Jin Lee, Chung Hee Woo
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2024; 30(3): 259.     CrossRef
    • High-Risk Symptom Cluster Groups for Work-Life Quality and Turnover Intention among Nurses
      Chiyoung Cha, Miran Lee
      Western Journal of Nursing Research.2023; 45(3): 192.     CrossRef
    • The instruments for evaluation the quality of nursing work life
      Katarína Mišovičová, Martina Tomagová
      Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century.2023; 22(2): 108.     CrossRef
    • Evaluating the Quality of Work Life Among Nurses: A Systematic Review
      Abbas Ebadi, Zeinab Tabanejad
      Journal of Archives in Military Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Relationship between a University Hospital Nurses’ Structural Empowerment and Quality of Nursing Work Life: Mediating Effect of Psychological Empowerment
      Eun Bee Baek, Sun Hyoung Bae
      Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2022; 47(2): 159.     CrossRef
    • A Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Educational Needs for Gerontological Nursing in Cancer Hospital Nurses
      Su Ah Lee, Young Whee Lee
      Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2021; 23(4): 384.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Workplace Spirituality on Quality of Work Life of Nurse Cancer Survivors in South Korea
      Juhyun Jin, Eunju Lee
      Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2020; 7(4): 346.     CrossRef
    • Factors Affecting Quality of Work Life in a Sample of Cancer Survivor Female Nurses
      Ju Hyun Jin, Eun Ju Lee
      Medicina.2020; 56(12): 721.     CrossRef
    • Factors Influencing Ageism in General Hospital Nurses
      Juah Kim, Jiyeon Ha
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2019; 25(5): 393.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale-Korean: Validity and Reliability
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28(6):646-658.   Published online December 31, 2016
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2016.28.6.646
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale-Korean: Validity and Reliability
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28(6):646-658.   Published online December 31, 2016
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2016.28.6.646
    Close
    Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale-Korean: Validity and Reliability
    Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale-Korean: Validity and Reliability

    Characteristics of Nurse Participants (N=309)

    Item Analysis (N=309)

    †Excluded items due to lower corrected item-total correlation; UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel, RN=registered nurse, MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education program.

    Factor Loading from Exploratory Factor Analysis for QNWL (N=309)

    UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel; RN=registered nurse; MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education.

    Reliability for QNWL and Mean Score for Each Item (N=309)

    QNWL=quality of nursing work life.
    Table 1 Characteristics of Nurse Participants (N=309)

    Table 2 Item Analysis (N=309)

    †Excluded items due to lower corrected item-total correlation; UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel, RN=registered nurse, MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education program.

    Table 3 Factor Loading from Exploratory Factor Analysis for QNWL (N=309)

    UAP=unlicensed assistant personnel; RN=registered nurse; MD=medical doctor; CE=continuing education.

    Table 4 Reliability for QNWL and Mean Score for Each Item (N=309)

    QNWL=quality of nursing work life.

    Table 1

    Table 2

    Table 3

    Table 4

    TOP