The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Jung Min Park; Sangeun Jun

doi:10.7475/KJAN.2018.30.1.79

Articles

Page Path

Original Research

The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Jung Min Park¹, Sangeun Jun²

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2018;30(1):79-88.
Published online: February 18, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/KJAN.2018.30.1.79

¹Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea

²College of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea

Corresponding author: Jun, Sangeun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1988-0357 College of Nursing, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea. Tel: +82-53-580-3923, Fax: +82-53-580-3916, E-mail: sejun2@kmu.ac.kr

- This manuscript is a revision of the first author's master's thesis from Keimyung University.

• Received: November 2, 2017 • Accepted: February 14, 2018

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

68 Views
1 Download
6 Crossref
5 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the willingness of family members to perform the CPR to their loved one with heart disease.
Methods
226 participants whose family member is hospitalized with heart disease were recruited from two hospitals in Daegu city. Data were collected by using questionnaires which included demographic charac-teristics, factors including knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy and the willingness to perform CPR.
Results
Participants reported on their level of knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy of CPR at the following levels: 9.16±2.66, 35.55±5.56, and 63.83±19.37 respectively. Only 53% of the participants reported prior CPR training, and 67.7% indicated that they would be willing to perform CPR to their family member with heart disease. Of the participants without prior CPR training, 34% reported that they did not recognize the importance of CPR training. Participants reported attitude (p=.002) and self-efficacy (p=.040) predicted willingness to perform CPR. Age (p<.001), gender (p=.004), educational level (p<.001), occupation (p<.001), prior CPR training (p<.001) were related to willingness to perform CPR.
Conclusion
This study findings suggest that it is necessary to develop educational programs for public to improve competent CPR performance.
Key Words: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Knowledge; Attitude; Self efficacy; Intention

Table 1.

General Characteristics of Participants (N=226)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M± SD
Gender	Male	102 (45.1)
Gender	Female	124 (54.9)
Age (year)		45.50±12.97
	20~29	31 (13.7)
	30~39	47 (20.8)
	40~49	65 (28.8)
	50~59	53 (23.4)
	≥60	30 (13.3)
Educational level	≤ Junior high school	22 (9.7)
	High school	59 (26.1)
	≥ College	145 (64.2)
Job status	Unemployed, housewives, students	62 (27.4)
	Office workers	59 (26.1)
	Public officers	33 (14.6)
	Professionals	30 (13.3)
	Others (commerce, agriculture, self-employed, etc.)	42 (18.6)
Experience of CPR performance	Yes	19 (8.4)
Experience of CPR performance	No	207 (91.6)
Experience of CPR training	Yes	120 (53.1)
Experience of CPR training	No	106 (46.9)
Participants with CPR training experience only (N=120)
Time passed since CPR training	＜6 months	13 (10.8)
	6~12 months	27 (22.5)
	1~2 years	21 (17.5)
	＞2 years	59 (49.2)
Latest CPR training site	Working place	42 (35.0)
	Military service	29 (24.2)
	School/education institute	22 (18.3)
	KACPR/The Red Cross/fire stations	10 (8.3)
	Hospital education program	6 (5.0)
	Others	11 (9.2)
Participants' comments to improve CPR training	I wish I could have more practice time.	50 (41.7)
	I wish they utilize more educational videos.	27 (22.5)
	I wish they teach us with more detailed and professional training contents.	26 (21.6)
	I wish instructors teach us more easily and better.	17 (13.2)
Participants without CPR training experience only (N=106)
Reasons not to take CPR training	I didn't have a chance for CPR training although I have a need for it.	59 (55.7)
	I have neither a need for CPR training nor a chance.	32 (30.2)
	I felt the need for CPR training and had a chance, but I didn't for personal reasons.	11 (10.3)
	I didn't have a need for CPR training although I had a chance for it.	4 (3.8)
Patients' diagnosis	Anginal pectoris	72 (31.9)
	Myocardial infarction	54 (23.9)
	Arrhythmia	65 (28.7)
	Heart failure	25 (11.1)
	Endocarditis/valvular heart disease	10 (4.4)
Time since diagnosed (year)	＜5	86 (38.1)
	5~10	56 (24.8)
	＞10	84 (37.1)
Patients' number of hospitalization due to heart disease (time)	None	65 (28.8)
	1~2	135 (59.7)
	≥3	26 (11.5)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	Yes	10 (4.4)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	No	216 (95.6)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KACPR=Korean association of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 2.

CPR Knowledge, Attitude, Self-efficacy, and Performance Willingness (N=226)

Variables			n (%) or M± SD
CPR knowledge	(0~15)		9.16±2.66
CPR attitudes	(10~50)		35.55±5.56
CPR self-efficacy	(0~120)		63.83±19.37
CPR performance willingness	Yes		153 (67.7)
CPR performance willingness	No		73 (32.3)
Reasons not doing CPR (n=73)	I am afraid that	I will not able to do CPR properly.	42 (57.5)
		I will not be able to judge whether CPR is needed.	22 (30.1)
		I will take legal responsibility. the disease is contagious.	5 (6.9)
			4 (5.5)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 3.

Differences between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficiency and Performance Willingness according to Characteristics (N=226)

Characteristics		CPR knowledge		CPR attitude		CPR self-efficacy		CPR Performance Willingness
		M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	Yes (n=153)	No (n=73)	x² (p)
		M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	n (%)	n (%)	x² (p)
Gender	Male	9.54±2.25	2.01	37.03±5.83	3.70	69.10±18.37	3.82	79 (51.6)	23 (31.5)	8.81
Gender	Female	8.85±2.93	(.046)	34.35±5.02	(＜.001)	59.49±19.16	(＜.001)	74 (48.4)	50 (68.5)	(.004)
Age (year)	20~29^a	11.06±2.26	10.10	35.55±5.42	0.23	68.19±17.23	1.74	27 (17.6)	4 (5.5)	22.90
	30~39^b	10.02±2.25	(＜.001)	35.49±4.88	(.920)	67.45±19.72	(.141)	38 (24.9)	9 (12.3)	(＜.001)
	40~49^c	8.85±2.67	a＞ c, d, e	35.66±5.66		61.54±19.05		41 (26.8)	24 (32.9)
	50~59^d	8.55±2.41	b＞ e	35.94±5.57		64.19±19.38		36 (23.5)	17 (23.3)
	≥60^e	7.60±2.64		34.73±6.62		57.97±20.60		11 (7.2)	19 (26.0)
Education level	≤ Junior high school^a	7.36±2.78	12.52	33.50±6.37	5.01	57.09±19.02	6.45	10 (6.5)	12 (16.4)	17.21
	High school^b	8.36±2.46	(＜.001)	34.24±5.58	(.007)	58.05±17.61	(.002)	31 (20.3)	28 (38.4)	(＜.001)
	≥ College^c	9.76±2.52	a, b＜ c	36.40±5.26	b＜ c	67.20±19.41	b＜ c	112 (73.2)	33 (45.2)
Job	Office workers^a	9.75±2.35	11.58	37.83±4.85	4.70	68.73±17.56	7.98	48 (31.3)	11 (15.1)	22.09
	Public officers^b	10.06±2.27	(＜.001)	35.70±4.89	(.001)	67.73±19.25	(＜.001)	26 (17.1)	7 (9.6)	(＜.001)
	Professionals^c	10.93±2.27	a, b, c	35.33±5.32	a＞ d	73.60±20.75	a, b, c＞ d	25 (16.3)	5 (6.8)
	Unemployed^d	8.15±2.79	＞ d, e	33.61±5.33		54.42±17.58		32 (20.9)	30 (41.1)
	Others^e	7.86±2.25		35.26±6.47		60.79±17.60		22 (14.4)	20 (27.4)
Experience of CPR performance	Yes	10.11±2.38	1.62	37.42±4.98	1.54	72.37±20.28	2.02	11 (7.2)	8 (11.0)	0.91
Experience of CPR performance	No	9.07±2.68	(.106)	35.38±5.59	(.126)	63.04±19.15	(.044)	142 (92.8)	65 (89.0)	(.442)
CPR training experience	Yes	10.42±2.17	8.72	37.13±5.20	4.74	71.14±17.57	6.58	98 (64.1)	22 (30.1)	22.83
CPR training experience	No	7.74±2.45	(＜.001)	33.77±5.43	(＜.001)	55.55±18.01	(＜.001)	55 (35.9)	51 (69.9)	(＜.001)
Patients' diagnosis	Anginal pectoris	8.81±2.53	1.816	35.28±5.78	0.210	63.28±19.78	0.715	48 (31.4)	24 (32.9)	0.39
	Myocardial infarction	9.50±2.70	(.127)	35.81±4.74	(.933)	67.46±17.56	(.582)	37 (24.2)	17 (23.2)	(.983)
	Arrhythmia	9.45±2.73		35.57±5.32		62.14±19.57		45 (29.4)	20 (27.4)
	Heart failure	8.28±2.49		36.12±6.63		61.44±20.62		17 (11.1)	8 (11.0)
	Endocarditis/valvular heart disease	10.20±2.94		34.60±7.46		65.10±22.45		6 (3.9)	4 (5.5)
Time since diagnosed (year)	＜5	9.66±2.55	2.75	35.78±5.65	0.27	64.05±18.47	0.49	62 (40.5)	24 (32.9)	2.99
	5~10	9.04±2.77	(.066)	35.73±5.12	(.767)	65.66±18.38	(.614)	40 (26.2)	16 (21.9)	(.224)
	＞10	8.73±2.65		35.55±5.56		62.38±20.97		51 (33.3)	33 (45.2)
Patients' number of hospitalization due to heart disease (time)	None	9.63±2.37	1.75	35.77±5.93	0.07	65.23±21.92	0.82	47 (30.7)	18 (24.6)	1.63
	1~2	8.90±2.82	(.176)	35.46±5.29	(.933)	62.54±18.36	(.444)	87 (56.9)	48 (65.8)	(.443)
	≥3	9.35±2.45		35.50±6.11		67.00±17.81		19 (12.4)	7 (9.6)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	Yes	9.20±2.62	-0.05	35.70±5.60	-0.09	63.10±23.37	0.12	5 (3.3)	5 (6.8)	1.50
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	No	9.16±2.67	(.961)	35.55±5.57	(.932)	63.86±19.23	(.904)	148 (96.7)	68 (93.2)	(.299)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 4.

Correlation between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficacy (N=226)

Categories	CPR Knowledge	CPR Attitude	CPR Self-efficacy
Categories	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)
CPR Knowledge	1
CPR Attitude	.27 (＜.001)	1
CPR Self-efficacy	.39 (＜.001)	.57 (＜.001)	1

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 5.

Effects of CPR Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy on CPR Performance Willingness (N=226)

Categories	B	SE	OR	95% CI	p
CPR knowledge	0.05	0.08	1.05	0.90~1.23	.530
CPR attitude	0.13	0.04	1.14	1.05~1.24	.002
CPR self-efficacy	0.02	0.01	1.02	1.00~1.05	.040
Cox & Snell R²			.27
Nagelkerke R²			.38

Adjusted variables: gender, age, education level, occupation, CPR training experience; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; SE=standard error;

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

REFERENCES

1.Park WS, Ko DS. Correlations between knowledge, attitude and performance ability to in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of youth about medical industry. Journal of the Korea Enter-tainment Industry Association.. 2015;9(3):349-55. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2015.09.9.3.349.
Article
2.Statistics Korea. Survey of acute cardiac arrest [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea; 2015. [cited 2017 May 16]. Available from.http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01&parentId=D.1;D1.2;D1_11788.3;#dhtmlgoodies_treeNode64.2.
3.Huikuri HV, Castellanos A, Myerburg RJ. Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. The New England Journal of Medicine.. 2001;345(20):1473-82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra000650.
Article
4.Park SH, Choi HJ, Kang BS, Im TH, Yeom SR. A study assessing the knowledge and attitude of first responders about car-diopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.. 2006;17(6):545-58.
5.Berdowski J, Blom MT, Bardai A, Tan HL, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Impact of onsite or dispatched automated external defib-rillator use on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation.. 2011;124:2225-32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015545.
Article
6.Kang KH, Yim J. A population health characteristic analysis of willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Koren Journal of Health Education and Promotion.. 2008;25(4):43-54.
7.Sohn HS, Kim YH. Factors influencing willingness to perform bystander CPR among elementary, middle and high school students. Crisisonomy.. 2015;11(11):247-59. https://doi.org/10.14251/krcem.2015.11.11.247.
Article
8.Lee MJ, Park KN, Kim H, Shin JH, Yang HJ, Rho TH. Analysis of factors contributing to reluctance and attitude toward car-diopulmonary resuscitation in the community. Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.. 2008;19(1):31-6.
9.Jung HK, Uhm TH. Factors that influence kindergarten teachers' willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services.. 2015;19(2):19- 27.https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2015.19.2.019.
Article
10.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath KHealth behavior: theory, re-search, and practice. 5th ed.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley; 2015.
11.An HS, Park IH. The effect of smoking prevention education program based on activities with elementary school students on their knowledge and attitude toward smoking and smoking refusal self-efficacy. The Journal of Learner-Centered Cur-riculum and Instruction.. 2016;16(5):465-86.
12.Jung DY, Kim HJ, Byun JY. A study of knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy for preventing falls among long term care fa-cilities' direct care workers in Korea. Korean Journal of Wo-men Health Nursing.. 2013;14(1):81-96.
13.Korea Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. 2015 Ko-rean guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emer-gency cardiovascular care [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; 2015. [cited 2016 August 5]. Available from.http://www.kacpr.org/popup/file/2016_guidelines_1_0331.pdf.
14.Cho HY. Analysis of nurses' attitude toward basic life support and influencing factors. [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei Uni-versity; 2008.
15.Schlessel JS, Rappa HA, Lesser M, Pogge D, Ennis R, Mandel L. CPR knowledge, self-Efficacy, and anticipated anxiety as functions of infant/child CPR training. Annals of Emergency Medicine.. 1995;25(5):618-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70174-5.
Article
16.Kang KHDevelopment and evaluation of a self-efficacy-based life support program for high-risk patients' family caregivers. [dissertation]. Seoul:. Seoul National University; 2004.
17.Park JMThe effectiveness of competency and retention in car-diopulmonary resuscitation through self-directed learning. [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2006. .S.
18.Seo HI, Park YS, Lee MJ, Ahn JY, Kim JK, Moon S, et al. Willingness variability of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in special situations. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.. 2017;28(4):287-93.
19.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Regional health statistics from 2008 to 2016. Community Health Survey. Seoul: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016. Report No.: 11-1352159-.p. 000033-10.
20.Chun YM, Park SH, Park SY. Effects on self efficacy in knowl-edge and attitude of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the higher grade of elementary school students. Journal of East- West Nursing Research.. 2013;19(2):121-7. https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2013.19.2.121.
Article
21.Choi SH. Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation education on the knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy of elementary and middle school teachers. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing.. 2015;29(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2015.29.1.18.
Article
22.Panchal AR, Fishman J, Camp-Rogers T, Starodub R, Merchant RM. An “ Intention-Focused” paradigm for improving bystander CPR performance. Resuscitation.. 2015;88:48-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.006.
Article
23.Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Beha-vior and Human Decision Processes.. 1991;50(2):179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Article

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Effects of immersive virtual reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on prospective kindergarten teachers' learning achievements, attitudes and self‐efficacy
Ze‐Min Liu, Xianli Fan, Yujiao Liu, Xin‐dong Ye
British Journal of Educational Technology.2022; 53(6): 2050. CrossRef
Relationships among Affect, Hardiness and Self-Efficacy in First Aid Provision by Airline Cabin Crew
Yi-Chen Yu, Jyh-Chong Liang
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(4): 2108. CrossRef
Indicators Related to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation According to Occupation Among Family Members of Coronary Heart Disease Patients
Gyung-Jae Oh, Kyungsuk Lee, Kyungsu Kim, Young-Hoon Lee
Chonnam Medical Journal.2020; 56(3): 196. CrossRef
Factors Influencing for Intention to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Elementary and Secondary School Teachers
Kyoung Sun Song, Kyung-Yeon Park
Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2020; 31(3): 384. CrossRef
Knowledge, Attitude, Self-Confidence and Performance Ability on Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of Seafarers
Jeong-Hee HWANG, Byung-Jo HAN
JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION.2019; 31(6): 1552. CrossRef
Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficacy of CPR among Health-related and Non Health-related Majors University Students
Young-Sook KIM, Ji-Suk KIM, Jeong-Eon PARK
JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION.2018; 30(3): 861. CrossRef

Cite

CITE

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2018;30(1):79-88. Published online February 28, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.1.79

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2018;30(1):79-88. Published online February 28, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.1.79

The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Table 1.

General Characteristics of Participants (N=226)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M± SD
Gender	Male	102 (45.1)
Gender	Female	124 (54.9)
Age (year)		45.50±12.97
	20~29	31 (13.7)
	30~39	47 (20.8)
	40~49	65 (28.8)
	50~59	53 (23.4)
	≥60	30 (13.3)
Educational level	≤ Junior high school	22 (9.7)
	High school	59 (26.1)
	≥ College	145 (64.2)
Job status	Unemployed, housewives, students	62 (27.4)
	Office workers	59 (26.1)
	Public officers	33 (14.6)
	Professionals	30 (13.3)
	Others (commerce, agriculture, self-employed, etc.)	42 (18.6)
Experience of CPR performance	Yes	19 (8.4)
Experience of CPR performance	No	207 (91.6)
Experience of CPR training	Yes	120 (53.1)
Experience of CPR training	No	106 (46.9)
Participants with CPR training experience only (N=120)
Time passed since CPR training	＜6 months	13 (10.8)
	6~12 months	27 (22.5)
	1~2 years	21 (17.5)
	＞2 years	59 (49.2)
Latest CPR training site	Working place	42 (35.0)
	Military service	29 (24.2)
	School/education institute	22 (18.3)
	KACPR/The Red Cross/fire stations	10 (8.3)
	Hospital education program	6 (5.0)
	Others	11 (9.2)
Participants' comments to improve CPR training	I wish I could have more practice time.	50 (41.7)
	I wish they utilize more educational videos.	27 (22.5)
	I wish they teach us with more detailed and professional training contents.	26 (21.6)
	I wish instructors teach us more easily and better.	17 (13.2)
Participants without CPR training experience only (N=106)
Reasons not to take CPR training	I didn't have a chance for CPR training although I have a need for it.	59 (55.7)
	I have neither a need for CPR training nor a chance.	32 (30.2)
	I felt the need for CPR training and had a chance, but I didn't for personal reasons.	11 (10.3)
	I didn't have a need for CPR training although I had a chance for it.	4 (3.8)
Patients' diagnosis	Anginal pectoris	72 (31.9)
	Myocardial infarction	54 (23.9)
	Arrhythmia	65 (28.7)
	Heart failure	25 (11.1)
	Endocarditis/valvular heart disease	10 (4.4)
Time since diagnosed (year)	＜5	86 (38.1)
	5~10	56 (24.8)
	＞10	84 (37.1)
Patients' number of hospitalization due to heart disease (time)	None	65 (28.8)
	1~2	135 (59.7)
	≥3	26 (11.5)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	Yes	10 (4.4)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	No	216 (95.6)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KACPR=Korean association of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 2.

CPR Knowledge, Attitude, Self-efficacy, and Performance Willingness (N=226)

Variables			n (%) or M± SD
CPR knowledge	(0~15)		9.16±2.66
CPR attitudes	(10~50)		35.55±5.56
CPR self-efficacy	(0~120)		63.83±19.37
CPR performance willingness	Yes		153 (67.7)
CPR performance willingness	No		73 (32.3)
Reasons not doing CPR (n=73)	I am afraid that	I will not able to do CPR properly.	42 (57.5)
		I will not be able to judge whether CPR is needed.	22 (30.1)
		I will take legal responsibility. the disease is contagious.	5 (6.9)
			4 (5.5)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 3.

Differences between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficiency and Performance Willingness according to Characteristics (N=226)

Characteristics		CPR knowledge		CPR attitude		CPR self-efficacy		CPR Performance Willingness
		M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	Yes (n=153)	No (n=73)	x² (p)
		M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	M± SD	t or F (p) Scheffé	n (%)	n (%)	x² (p)
Gender	Male	9.54±2.25	2.01	37.03±5.83	3.70	69.10±18.37	3.82	79 (51.6)	23 (31.5)	8.81
Gender	Female	8.85±2.93	(.046)	34.35±5.02	(＜.001)	59.49±19.16	(＜.001)	74 (48.4)	50 (68.5)	(.004)
Age (year)	20~29^a	11.06±2.26	10.10	35.55±5.42	0.23	68.19±17.23	1.74	27 (17.6)	4 (5.5)	22.90
	30~39^b	10.02±2.25	(＜.001)	35.49±4.88	(.920)	67.45±19.72	(.141)	38 (24.9)	9 (12.3)	(＜.001)
	40~49^c	8.85±2.67	a＞ c, d, e	35.66±5.66		61.54±19.05		41 (26.8)	24 (32.9)
	50~59^d	8.55±2.41	b＞ e	35.94±5.57		64.19±19.38		36 (23.5)	17 (23.3)
	≥60^e	7.60±2.64		34.73±6.62		57.97±20.60		11 (7.2)	19 (26.0)
Education level	≤ Junior high school^a	7.36±2.78	12.52	33.50±6.37	5.01	57.09±19.02	6.45	10 (6.5)	12 (16.4)	17.21
	High school^b	8.36±2.46	(＜.001)	34.24±5.58	(.007)	58.05±17.61	(.002)	31 (20.3)	28 (38.4)	(＜.001)
	≥ College^c	9.76±2.52	a, b＜ c	36.40±5.26	b＜ c	67.20±19.41	b＜ c	112 (73.2)	33 (45.2)
Job	Office workers^a	9.75±2.35	11.58	37.83±4.85	4.70	68.73±17.56	7.98	48 (31.3)	11 (15.1)	22.09
	Public officers^b	10.06±2.27	(＜.001)	35.70±4.89	(.001)	67.73±19.25	(＜.001)	26 (17.1)	7 (9.6)	(＜.001)
	Professionals^c	10.93±2.27	a, b, c	35.33±5.32	a＞ d	73.60±20.75	a, b, c＞ d	25 (16.3)	5 (6.8)
	Unemployed^d	8.15±2.79	＞ d, e	33.61±5.33		54.42±17.58		32 (20.9)	30 (41.1)
	Others^e	7.86±2.25		35.26±6.47		60.79±17.60		22 (14.4)	20 (27.4)
Experience of CPR performance	Yes	10.11±2.38	1.62	37.42±4.98	1.54	72.37±20.28	2.02	11 (7.2)	8 (11.0)	0.91
Experience of CPR performance	No	9.07±2.68	(.106)	35.38±5.59	(.126)	63.04±19.15	(.044)	142 (92.8)	65 (89.0)	(.442)
CPR training experience	Yes	10.42±2.17	8.72	37.13±5.20	4.74	71.14±17.57	6.58	98 (64.1)	22 (30.1)	22.83
CPR training experience	No	7.74±2.45	(＜.001)	33.77±5.43	(＜.001)	55.55±18.01	(＜.001)	55 (35.9)	51 (69.9)	(＜.001)
Patients' diagnosis	Anginal pectoris	8.81±2.53	1.816	35.28±5.78	0.210	63.28±19.78	0.715	48 (31.4)	24 (32.9)	0.39
	Myocardial infarction	9.50±2.70	(.127)	35.81±4.74	(.933)	67.46±17.56	(.582)	37 (24.2)	17 (23.2)	(.983)
	Arrhythmia	9.45±2.73		35.57±5.32		62.14±19.57		45 (29.4)	20 (27.4)
	Heart failure	8.28±2.49		36.12±6.63		61.44±20.62		17 (11.1)	8 (11.0)
	Endocarditis/valvular heart disease	10.20±2.94		34.60±7.46		65.10±22.45		6 (3.9)	4 (5.5)
Time since diagnosed (year)	＜5	9.66±2.55	2.75	35.78±5.65	0.27	64.05±18.47	0.49	62 (40.5)	24 (32.9)	2.99
	5~10	9.04±2.77	(.066)	35.73±5.12	(.767)	65.66±18.38	(.614)	40 (26.2)	16 (21.9)	(.224)
	＞10	8.73±2.65		35.55±5.56		62.38±20.97		51 (33.3)	33 (45.2)
Patients' number of hospitalization due to heart disease (time)	None	9.63±2.37	1.75	35.77±5.93	0.07	65.23±21.92	0.82	47 (30.7)	18 (24.6)	1.63
	1~2	8.90±2.82	(.176)	35.46±5.29	(.933)	62.54±18.36	(.444)	87 (56.9)	48 (65.8)	(.443)
	≥3	9.35±2.45		35.50±6.11		67.00±17.81		19 (12.4)	7 (9.6)
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	Yes	9.20±2.62	-0.05	35.70±5.60	-0.09	63.10±23.37	0.12	5 (3.3)	5 (6.8)	1.50
Patients' experience of cardiac arrest	No	9.16±2.67	(.961)	35.55±5.57	(.932)	63.86±19.23	(.904)	148 (96.7)	68 (93.2)	(.299)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 4.

Correlation between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficacy (N=226)

Categories	CPR Knowledge	CPR Attitude	CPR Self-efficacy
Categories	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)
CPR Knowledge	1
CPR Attitude	.27 (＜.001)	1
CPR Self-efficacy	.39 (＜.001)	.57 (＜.001)	1

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 5.

Effects of CPR Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy on CPR Performance Willingness (N=226)

Categories	B	SE	OR	95% CI	p
CPR knowledge	0.05	0.08	1.05	0.90~1.23	.530
CPR attitude	0.13	0.04	1.14	1.05~1.24	.002
CPR self-efficacy	0.02	0.01	1.02	1.00~1.05	.040
Cox & Snell R²			.27
Nagelkerke R²			.38

Adjusted variables: gender, age, education level, occupation, CPR training experience; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; SE=standard error;

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

Table 1. General Characteristics of Participants (N=226)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KACPR=Korean association of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 2. CPR Knowledge, Attitude, Self-efficacy, and Performance Willingness (N=226)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 3. Differences between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficiency and Performance Willingness according to Characteristics (N=226)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 4. Correlation between CPR Knowledge, Attitude and Self-efficacy (N=226)

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Table 5. Effects of CPR Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy on CPR Performance Willingness (N=226)

Adjusted variables: gender, age, education level, occupation, CPR training experience; CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; SE=standard error;

Articles

Page Path

The Effects of Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-efficacy of CPR on Willingness to Perform CPR in Family Members of Patients with Heart Disease

Full Article

Abstract

REFERENCES

Figure & Data

References

Citations

CITE

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

Table 4.

Table 5.

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

EDITORIAL POLICY

FOR CONTRIBUTORS