• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Research

Stigma and Distress among Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effect of Self-blame

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2018;30(1):89-97.
Published online: February 18, 2018

1Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science, Gwangju, Korea

2Department of Nursing, Kwangju Women's University, Gwangju, Korea

3College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea

Corresponding author: So, Hyang Sook https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-5900 College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea. Tel: +82-62-530-4939, Fax: +82-62-220-4544, E-mail: hsso0075@jnu.ac.kr
• Received: November 7, 2017   • Accepted: February 16, 2018

© 2018 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 66 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 14 Crossref
  • 11 Scopus
prev
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to identify the mediating effect of reported self-blame in the relationship between stigma and distress among cancer patients.
  • Methods
    A convenience sample of 247 inpatients and out-patients diagnosed with one of the five major cancers was recruited. A cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected from June 2013 to November 2013. The instruments used for data collection were the Korean Cancer Stigma Scale, the Psychological Symptom Inventory, and the Social Shame and Guilt Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression using Baron and Kenny steps for mediation.
  • Results
    The mean score reported for cancer stigma was 35.34, the mean score for distress was 13.77, and the mean for self-blame was 19.25. There was a significant correlation among stigma, distress, and self-blame. Self-blame was directly affected by stigma (R2=34.3%). Distress was directly affected by stigma (R2=13.0%). Stigma and self-blame impacted reported distress (R2=20.9%). Self-blame had a partial mediating effect (β=.35, p<.001) in the relationship between stigma and distress (Sobel test: Z=3.64, p<.001).
  • Conclusion
    Based on the findings of this study, nursing intervention programs focusing on reducing stigma and decreasing self-blame may relieve the distress reported by patients with cancer.
Figure 1.
Mediating effect of self-blame in the relationship between stigma and distress.
kjan-30-89f1.jpg
Table 1.
Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress according to General Characteristics of Participants (N=247)
Variables Categories n (%) or M±SD Stigma Self-blame Distress
M± SD t or F (p) M± SD t or F (p) M± SD t or F (p)
Age (year) 40~49 72(29.3) 36.49±9.00 1.23 20.57±7.96 2.11 9.63±6.43 1.30
50~59 60(24.4) 35.42±9.70 (.300) 19.63±7.77 (.100) 7.68±7.42 (.275)
60~69 68(27.6) 35.60±8.40   17.51±6.28   7.68±7.00  
≥70 46(18.7) 33.24±9.22   19.22±7.15   7.83±6.77  
  57.3±12.3 35.37±9.07   19.24±7.38   8.28±6.91  
Gender Men 98(39.7) 36.11±9.26 1.08 18.48±6.84 -1.34 6.06±5.88 -4.20
Women 149(60.3) 34.84±8.93 (.281) 19.76±7.66 (.182) 9.71±7.16 (<.001)
Spouse Yes 215(87.0) 34.90±8.81 -1.99 18.99±7.37 -1.44 8.05±6.69 -1.28
No 32(13.0) 38.31±10.27 (.047) 21.00±7.17 (.150) 9.72±8.17 (.202)
Religion None 85(34.4) 34.39±8.22 1.14 18.19±6.98 0.85 8.27±6.86 0.52
Protestantism 75(30.4) 36.32±10.29 (.336) 19.96±7.64 (.496) 7.53±6.48 (.723)
Catholicism 24(9.7) 37.63±9.06   19.83±8.00   8.96±7.26  
Buddhism 60(24.3) 34.83±8.58   19.78±7.39   9.00±7.40  
Others 3(1.2) 30.00±6.56   16.33±4.93   6.00±7.94  
Monthly household income (10,000 won) 50~<100 97(39.3) 34.15±8.34 1.06 19.14±7.30 1.28 7.41±7.38 0.85
100~<200 93(37.7) 35.84±9.88 (.369) 18.49±7.33 (.281) 8.69±6.72 (.466)
200~<300 32(13.0) 36.84±10.14   21.19±6.85   9.31±6.95  
≥300 25(10.0) 36.48±6.91   20.48±8.46   8.48±5.65  
Education level Illiteracy 15(6.0) 34.93±11.76 1.71 21.60±7.78 2.20 9.80±9.69 2.10
Elementary 47(19.0) 32.77±6.39 (.149) 17.28±5.66 (.069) 6.51±6.16 (.081)
Middle school 58(23.5) 34.69±8.47   18.21±6.58   7.38±7.05  
High school 91(36.8) 36.63±10.14   19.88±7.90   8.66±6.67  
≥ College 36(14.7) 36.69±8.44   20.94±8.39   10.33±6.40  
Cancer stage I 58(23.5) 33.45±7.67 1.19 18.03±7.15 8.79 8.91±7.19 1.69
II 41(16.6) 36.22±8.70 (.310) 20.29±6.46 (.452) 10.05±7.34 (.170)
III 47(19.0) 35.36±10.54   19.11±7.72   7.38±6.29  
IV 101(40.9) 36.07±9.18   19.59±7.66   7.57±6.76  
Diagnosis Colon cancer a 50(20.3) 38.20±11.30 1.96 20.06±7.56 2.50 8.80±5.48 8.70
Breast cancer b 51(20.6) 33.94±7.71 (.101) 18.73±7.86 (.044) 8.53±6.44 (.001)
Cervix cancer c 50(20.3) 35.55±9.16   21.30±7.14   12.34±7.73 c> d, e
Gastric cancer d 49(19.8) 35.28±8.40   16.90±6.53   5.90±5.96  
Lung cancer e 47(19.0) 33.76±8.00   19.23±7.19   5.53±6.72  
Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics of Research Variables (N=247)
Variables M± SD Item number (scoring) Range Mean/item± SD
Possible Actual
Stigma 35.34±9.07 24 (1~4) 24~96 24~86 1.41±0.36
Self-blame 19.25±7.36 10 (1~5) 10~50 10~46 1.93±0.74
Distress 8.26±6.90 3 (0~10) 0~30 0~30 2.75±2.30
Table 3.
Relationships between Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress (N=247)
Variables Stigma Self-blame Distress
r (p) r (p) r (p)
Stigma 1 .59 (<.001) .37 (<.001)
Self-blame   1 .45 (<.001)
Distress     1
Table 4.
Mediating Effect of Self-blame in the Relationships between Stigma and Distress (N=247)
Step   Variables   B β t p Adj. R2 F p
Step 1 Stigma Self-blame .48 .59 11.39 <.001 .343 129.66 <.001
Step 2 Stigma Distress .49 .37 6.14 <.001 .130 37.64 <.001
Step 3 Stigma, Self-blame Distress         .209 33.48 <.001
1) Stigma Distress .21 .16 2.23 .027      
2) Self-blame Distress .59 .35 5.06 <.001      
Sobel test : Z=3.64, p<.001
  • 1.National Cancer Information Center. Cancer incidence trend analysis [Internet]. Seoul: National Cancer Information Center; 2017. [cited 2017 December 26]. Available from.https://www.cancer.go.kr/lay1/S1T639C643/contents.do.
  • 2.Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics in 2016 [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea; 2017. [cited 2017 September 22]. Available from.http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/6/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=363268.
  • 3.Lee JL, Kim KS. The relationships between stigma, distress, and quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing.. 2011;11(3):237-46. https://doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.3.237.
  • 4.Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. British Medical Journal.. 2004;328(7454):1470-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C.
  • 5.LoConte NK, Else-Quest NM, Eickhoff J, Hyde J, Schiller JH. Assessment of guilt and shame in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer compared with patients with breast and prostate cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer.. 2008;9(3):171-8. https://doi.org/10.3816/CLC.2008.n.026.
  • 6.Corrigan PW, Watson AC. The stigma of psychiatric disorders and the gender, ethnicity, and education of the perceiver. Com-munity Mental Health Journal.. 2007;43(5):439-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-007-9084-9.
  • 7.Cho J, Smith K, Choi EK, Kim IR, Chang YJ, Park HY, et al. Public attitudes toward cancer and cancer patients: a national survey in Korea. Psycho-Oncology.. 2013;22(3):605-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3041.
  • 8.Cataldo JK, Jahan TM, Pongquan VL. Lung cancer stigma, depression, and quality of life among ever and never smokers. European Journal of Oncology Nursing.. 2012;16(3):264-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.06.008.
  • 9.Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Hyde JS. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychology and Health.. 2009;24(8):949-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440802074664.
  • 10.Phelan SM, Griffin JM, Jackson GL, Zafar SY, Hellerstedt W, Stahre M, et al. Stigma, perceived blame, self-blame, and de-pressive symptoms in men with colorectal cancer. Psycho-Oncology.. 2013;22(1):65-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2048.
  • 11.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Managing stress and distress 2017 [Internet] [cited 2017 July 10]. Available from.https://www.nccn.org/patients/resources/life_with_cancer/distress.aspx.
  • 12.National Cancer Information Center. Recommendations for distress management in cancer patients [Internet]. Seoul: Min-istry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs; 2008. [cited 2012 May 20]. Available from.http://www.cancer.go.kr/ebook/6/PC/6.html.
  • 13.Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Pianta-dosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology.. 2001;10(1):19-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>3.0.CO;2-6.
  • 14.Shim EJ, Shin JW, Jeon HJ, Hahm BJ. Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list. Psycho-Oncology.. 2008;17(6):548-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1275.
  • 15.Jeong KS, Heo JE, Tae YS. Relationships among distress, fam-ily support, and health promotion behavior in breast cancer survivors. Asian Oncology Nursing.. 2014;14(3):146-54. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2014.14.3.146.
  • 16.Kwon EJ, Yi MS. Distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Korea. Asian Oncology Nursing.. 2012;12(4):289-96. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.289.
  • 17.Seo JY, Yi MS. Distress and quality of life in cancer patients re-ceiving chemotherapy. Asian Oncology Nursing.. 2015;15(1):18-27. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2015.15.1.18.
  • 18.Hamer M, Chida Y, Molloy GJ. Psychological distress and cancer mortality. Journal of Psychosomatic Research.. 2009;66(3):255-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.002.
  • 19.Brown KW, Levy AR, Rosberger Z, Edgar L. Psychological distress and cancer survival: a follow-up 10 years after diagnosis. Psychosomatic Medicine.. 2003;65(4):636-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000077503.96903.A6.
  • 20.Raleigh ZT. A biopsychosocial perspectives on the experience of lung cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.. 2010;28(1):116-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347330903438990.
  • 21.Chambers SK, Baade P, Youl P, Aitken J, Occhipinti S, Vinod S, et al. Psychological distress and quality of life in lung cancer: the role of health-related stigma, illness appraisals and social constraints. Psycho-Oncology.. 2015;24(11):1569-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3829.
  • 22.Bennett KK, Compas BE, Beckjord E, Glinder JG. Self-blame and distress among women with newly diagnosed breast can-cer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine.. 2005;28(4):)313-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9000-0.
  • 23.So HS, Chae MJ, Kim HY. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the cancer stigma scale. Journal of Korean Acad-emy of Nursing.. 2017;47(1):121-32. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.1.121.
  • 24.Marschall D, Sanftner J, Tangney JPThe state shame and guilt scale. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University; 1994.
  • 25.Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable dis-tinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.. 1986;51(6):1173-82.
  • 26.Byun HS, Kim EK, Kim GD. Impacts of stigma and distress on the quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Crisisonomy.. 2015;11(8):223-40.
  • 27.Brown Johnson CG, Broadsky JL, Cataldo JK. Lung cancer stigma, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.. 2014;32(1):59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2013.855963.
  • 28.Glinder JG, Compas BE. Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychology.. 1999;18(5):475-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.475.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Perceived stigmatization in cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis: the role of socioeconomic status
      Jochen Ernst, Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Ute Goerling, Tanja Zimmermann, Beate Hornemann, Franziska Springer, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
      Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Development of a Scale to Assess Cancer Attitude in the Community
      Neşe Uysal, Filiz Ünal Toprak
      Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2024; 40(6): 151728.     CrossRef
    • Disease Perception, Stigma, Distress, Physical Symptom Experience and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Cross-Sectional Study
      Eun-Hee Lee, Dongwon Choi
      Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2024; 31(4): 494.     CrossRef
    • Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms Among Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast, Gastrointestinal, Gynecological, or Lung Cancer
      Johanna A. Suskin, Steven M. Paul, Ashley R. Stuckey, Yvette P. Conley, Jon D. Levine, Marilyn J. Hammer, Christine Miaskowski, Laura B. Dunn
      Cancer Nursing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Turkish validity and reliability of the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS-T)
      Banu Çevik, Sultan Kav, Pelinsu Kaynar, Zeynep Kübra Sahin, Büşra Tekcan, Şeymanur Ülker
      Palliative and Supportive Care.2023; 21(1): 100.     CrossRef
    • The Relationship between Self-Perceived Health and Physical Activity in the Mental Health of Korean Cancer Survivors
      Sungjung Kwak, Jieun Shin, Jong-Yeup Kim
      Healthcare.2023; 11(11): 1549.     CrossRef
    • Factors associated with distress among female cancer survivors at the workplace: A cross-sectional study
      Juhyun Jin, Eunju Lee, Suin Lee
      Journal of Occupational Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Factors associated with the quality of work life among working breast cancer survivors
      Juhyun Jin
      Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2022; 9(2): 97.     CrossRef
    • Structural Equation Model of the Quality of Working Life among Cancer Survivors Returning to Work
      Ju Hyun Jin, Eun Ju Lee
      Asian Nursing Research.2021; 15(1): 37.     CrossRef
    • Factors Affecting Quality of Work Life in a Sample of Cancer Survivor Female Nurses
      Ju Hyun Jin, Eun Ju Lee
      Medicina.2020; 56(12): 721.     CrossRef
    • Good Nursing Experience of Patients with Cancer in a Korean Cancer Hospital
      Eunyoung E. Suh, Hye Jin Yoo, Jeong Hee Hong, In Gak Kwon, Hyunju Song
      Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2020; 13(3): 51.     CrossRef
    • Relationship between Mothers' Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Attitudes toward Preventing Cervical Cancer in their Pubertal Daughters
      Da Bit Lee, Hae Won Kim
      Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2019; 25(4): 434.     CrossRef
    • The Mediating Effect of Workplace Spirituality on the Relation between Job Stress and Job Satisfaction of Cancer Survivors Returning to Work
      Ju-Hyun Jin, Eun-Ju Lee
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(19): 3510.     CrossRef
    • Experience of Cancer Patients Receiving Spiritual Nursing Care in one Christian General Hospital
      Eun Youngi Seo, Suhye Kwon, Youngkyoung Kim, ALeum Han
      Asian Oncology Nursing.2019; 19(3): 179.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Stigma and Distress among Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effect of Self-blame
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2018;30(1):89-97.   Published online February 28, 2018
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Stigma and Distress among Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effect of Self-blame
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2018;30(1):89-97.   Published online February 28, 2018
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    Stigma and Distress among Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effect of Self-blame
    Image
    Figure 1. Mediating effect of self-blame in the relationship between stigma and distress.
    Stigma and Distress among Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effect of Self-blame

    Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress according to General Characteristics of Participants (N=247)

    Variables Categories n (%) or M±SD Stigma Self-blame Distress
    M± SD t or F (p) M± SD t or F (p) M± SD t or F (p)
    Age (year) 40~49 72(29.3) 36.49±9.00 1.23 20.57±7.96 2.11 9.63±6.43 1.30
    50~59 60(24.4) 35.42±9.70 (.300) 19.63±7.77 (.100) 7.68±7.42 (.275)
    60~69 68(27.6) 35.60±8.40   17.51±6.28   7.68±7.00  
    ≥70 46(18.7) 33.24±9.22   19.22±7.15   7.83±6.77  
      57.3±12.3 35.37±9.07   19.24±7.38   8.28±6.91  
    Gender Men 98(39.7) 36.11±9.26 1.08 18.48±6.84 -1.34 6.06±5.88 -4.20
    Women 149(60.3) 34.84±8.93 (.281) 19.76±7.66 (.182) 9.71±7.16 (<.001)
    Spouse Yes 215(87.0) 34.90±8.81 -1.99 18.99±7.37 -1.44 8.05±6.69 -1.28
    No 32(13.0) 38.31±10.27 (.047) 21.00±7.17 (.150) 9.72±8.17 (.202)
    Religion None 85(34.4) 34.39±8.22 1.14 18.19±6.98 0.85 8.27±6.86 0.52
    Protestantism 75(30.4) 36.32±10.29 (.336) 19.96±7.64 (.496) 7.53±6.48 (.723)
    Catholicism 24(9.7) 37.63±9.06   19.83±8.00   8.96±7.26  
    Buddhism 60(24.3) 34.83±8.58   19.78±7.39   9.00±7.40  
    Others 3(1.2) 30.00±6.56   16.33±4.93   6.00±7.94  
    Monthly household income (10,000 won) 50~<100 97(39.3) 34.15±8.34 1.06 19.14±7.30 1.28 7.41±7.38 0.85
    100~<200 93(37.7) 35.84±9.88 (.369) 18.49±7.33 (.281) 8.69±6.72 (.466)
    200~<300 32(13.0) 36.84±10.14   21.19±6.85   9.31±6.95  
    ≥300 25(10.0) 36.48±6.91   20.48±8.46   8.48±5.65  
    Education level Illiteracy 15(6.0) 34.93±11.76 1.71 21.60±7.78 2.20 9.80±9.69 2.10
    Elementary 47(19.0) 32.77±6.39 (.149) 17.28±5.66 (.069) 6.51±6.16 (.081)
    Middle school 58(23.5) 34.69±8.47   18.21±6.58   7.38±7.05  
    High school 91(36.8) 36.63±10.14   19.88±7.90   8.66±6.67  
    ≥ College 36(14.7) 36.69±8.44   20.94±8.39   10.33±6.40  
    Cancer stage I 58(23.5) 33.45±7.67 1.19 18.03±7.15 8.79 8.91±7.19 1.69
    II 41(16.6) 36.22±8.70 (.310) 20.29±6.46 (.452) 10.05±7.34 (.170)
    III 47(19.0) 35.36±10.54   19.11±7.72   7.38±6.29  
    IV 101(40.9) 36.07±9.18   19.59±7.66   7.57±6.76  
    Diagnosis Colon cancer a 50(20.3) 38.20±11.30 1.96 20.06±7.56 2.50 8.80±5.48 8.70
    Breast cancer b 51(20.6) 33.94±7.71 (.101) 18.73±7.86 (.044) 8.53±6.44 (.001)
    Cervix cancer c 50(20.3) 35.55±9.16   21.30±7.14   12.34±7.73 c> d, e
    Gastric cancer d 49(19.8) 35.28±8.40   16.90±6.53   5.90±5.96  
    Lung cancer e 47(19.0) 33.76±8.00   19.23±7.19   5.53±6.72  

    Descriptive Statistics of Research Variables (N=247)

    Variables M± SD Item number (scoring) Range Mean/item± SD
    Possible Actual
    Stigma 35.34±9.07 24 (1~4) 24~96 24~86 1.41±0.36
    Self-blame 19.25±7.36 10 (1~5) 10~50 10~46 1.93±0.74
    Distress 8.26±6.90 3 (0~10) 0~30 0~30 2.75±2.30

    Relationships between Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress (N=247)

    Variables Stigma Self-blame Distress
    r (p) r (p) r (p)
    Stigma 1 .59 (<.001) .37 (<.001)
    Self-blame   1 .45 (<.001)
    Distress     1

    Mediating Effect of Self-blame in the Relationships between Stigma and Distress (N=247)

    Step   Variables   B β t p Adj. R2 F p
    Step 1 Stigma Self-blame .48 .59 11.39 <.001 .343 129.66 <.001
    Step 2 Stigma Distress .49 .37 6.14 <.001 .130 37.64 <.001
    Step 3 Stigma, Self-blame Distress         .209 33.48 <.001
    1) Stigma Distress .21 .16 2.23 .027      
    2) Self-blame Distress .59 .35 5.06 <.001      
    Sobel test : Z=3.64, p<.001
    Table 1. Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress according to General Characteristics of Participants (N=247)

    Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Research Variables (N=247)

    Table 3. Relationships between Stigma, Self-blame, and Distress (N=247)

    Table 4. Mediating Effect of Self-blame in the Relationships between Stigma and Distress (N=247)

    TOP