Purpose
Patient outcomes should improve through patient involvement and improved interactions with healthcare providers during the care process. This study aimed to examine factors affecting the perceived health status of patients with cancer, focused on their treatment experiences, and explored the differences in treatment-related experiences according to the patients’ characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study used the 2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which assesses patients’ general characteristics, treatment-related experiences, and perceived health status. Data from 255 cancer survivors aged 19 years or older were used in this study. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and multiple regression were used for the data analyses. Results: Cancer patients’ perception of a lower health resulted from the following factors: insufficient information provision during the care process (β=-.13, p=.026), less participation in the treatment-related decision-making (β=-.25, p=.005), and more comorbidities (β=-.31, p=.018). A higher education level (β=.68, p<.001) was associated with higher perceived health status. The set of significant factors explained 19% of the total variance of the perceived health status. Conclusion: Sufficient information provision during the care process and patients’ participation in treatment-related decision-making affected the perceived health status of cancer patients. Hence, providing cancer patients with information and involving them in decision-making may improve illness self-management capabilities and health status.

PURPOSE
This is for analyzing the recent citations from papers enrolled in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and understanding correct marking of references. METHOD: Targeted 2,334 references in 93 articles introduced from Feb. 2002 to Dec. 2002 which are applied current contribution rules of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. RESULT: 1. 25 references are quoted per article and particularly foreign journals are most frequently quoted. Among foreign journals, Nursing Research is most frequently used. The Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing is also mostly referred material among national journals. 2. The retrieval rate is prove to be 1,539(83.8%) and 267(11.7%) are without errors and the other 2,022 have at least more than one error regardless of frequency. 3. Major error rate of periodical publication is 484(36.8%) and most occurred in the inconsistency of titles between articles and references. 4. Foreign journals have much more errors than national ones concerning periodical publications. CONCLUSION: Correct citation and marking of references can be achieved through strict reviewing process by authors, editors, publishers and paper investigators. In consequence, it is expected that these processes can cause improvement of quality in impact factor and papers.