• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"Predictive value of tests"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Predictive value of tests"

Original Article
Validation of Prediction Models for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Lung Resection: A Retrospective Study
Suji Jung, Sun-Kyung Hwang
Korean J Adult Nurs 2023;35(2):85-96.   Published online May 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2023.35.2.85
Purpose
This study aimed to verify the potential use of postoperative pulmonary complications prediction models in patients with lung resection.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 1,160 patients were selected among the admitted patients who underwent lung resection surgery. The predictive validity of the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia Tool (ARISCAT) and the Pulmonary Complications Risk Score (PCRS)-lung resection model were assessed based on the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC).
Results
Of the patients, 420 (36.2%) developed postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery within 30 days. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were 52.2%, 70.6%, 49.0%, and 74.0%, respectively, for the ARISCAT (cut-off point of 47), and 53.8%, 78.5%, 15.3%, and 95.9%, respectively, for the PCRS-lung resection model (cut-off point of 147). The AUCs were 0.65 (ARISCAT) and 0.70 (PCRS-lung resection model).
Conclusion
The findings indicate that the predictive validity values of the ARISCAT was sufficient, and the PCRS-lung resection model was good. However, the clinical usefulness of the models should be verified in future studies.
  • 50 View
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Scopus
TOP