PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the role-expectations of gerontological nurse practitioners and performance of gerontological nursing by nurses in long term care hospitals and general hospitals.
METHODS
Subjects were 200 nurses; 100 nurses from long term care hospitals where as 100 nurses from general hospitals. The subjects completed a questionnaire on general characteristics, role-expectations of gerontological nurse practitioners, and performance of gerontological nursing by nurses. Data were collected from February to March 2013 and analyzed using SPSS/WIN 18.0 version program in order to perform descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS
Results indicated that there were significant differences in the role-expectations of gerontological nurse practitioners and performance of gerontological nursing between nurses from long term care hospitals and those from general hospitals.
CONCLUSION
Nurses in general hospitals showed significantly higher role expectations than nurses in long term care hospitals. Therefore it is necessary to spread the knowledge on the roles of gerontological nurse practitioners and the nurse practitioners system to nurses in long term care hospitals.

Citations

• Hospitalization experience of elderly surgical patients: A phenomenological study
  Yujeong Shin, Dukyoo Jung, Hyunjoo Oh
  Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2025; 27(1): 84.     CrossRef
• Job performance of nurses with gerontological nurse practitioner certification: A descriptive survey study
  Suyeon Kim, Minjae Lee, Sujin Shin
  Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2025; 27(2): 199.     CrossRef
• Workload-Related Issues among Nurses Caring for Patients with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Scoping Review
  Younhee Kang, Chohee Bang
  Healthcare.2024; 12(18): 1893.     CrossRef
• Moderated moderation effect of empathy and resilience on the relationship between geriatric care-related stress and geriatric nursing practice among secondary hospital nurses: A cross-sectional study
  Young Suk Choe, Yang Gyeong Yoo
  Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2023; 25(1): 89.     CrossRef
• Experiences of Advanced Health Assessment Simulation Based on the Education Needs of Gerontological Nurse Practitioner Students
  Jiyoung Kim, Hyunju Dan
  Healthcare.2023; 11(8): 1162.     CrossRef
• Attitudes Toward Older Adults and Need for Education Among Nurses and Nursing Assistants
  YoonRyeong Cheon, Kihye Han, Sophia J. Chung
  The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing.2021; 52(11): 517.     CrossRef
• The Moderating Effect of Empowerment in Relationship between Self-leadership and Job Satisfaction for Nurses Working in Long-term Care Hospitals
  Kyoungsuk Kim, Heeok Park
  Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2016; 18(1): 32.     CrossRef
• Experience of Job Stress among Nurses Working in Long-term Care Hospital: A Phenomenological Approach
  Hui Jin Kim, Hye Young Kim
  Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2016; 28(5): 572.     CrossRef
• The Influence of Attitude, Experience and Empathy on the Nursing Care of the Elderly Who Have No Caregiver
  Nam-Sook Seo, Ji-Seon Moon, So-Hyoung Hong, Yang-Hee Park
  The Korean Journal of Health Service Management.2016; 10(2): 179.     CrossRef

PURPOSE
The purposes of this article were to analyze curricula of gerontological nurse practitioner(GNP) programs in the United States, to compare the curricula with Korean GNP programs, and to provide suggestions for better GNP programs in Korea.
METHODS
Top GNP programs in the United States were identified from the US NEWS and 12 universities were included in the analyses. Class distribution, credit hours, and clinical hours were analyzed and suggestions for Korean GNP programs were made.
RESULTS
Average credit hours for class lectures in the US GNP programs were 47 and emphases on physiology, pharmacology, physical assessment, and disease management were identified. Most US GNP programs(75%) provided health concerns for both middle aged and older adults. Not all US GNP programs included 'theory' or 'the introduction to GNP' classes, while these are required classes in the Korean GNP program. The mean clinical hours in the US GNP Programs were 537 which are much higher than those in the Korean GNP program.
CONCLUSION
Based on the analyses, we can conclude that Korean GNP programs are lacking in many ways. Further evaluation and curricula modifications are required to settle down the program better and to have the graduates prepared more as internationally competent nurse practitioners.