Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the revised Korean version of the Nurses' Ethical Behaviors for Protecting Patient's Rights Scale (NEBPPRS-K25). Methods The participants in this study consisted of 311 nurses employed at university hospitals located in D, S, or U cities. Data were collected from July 1 to August 31, 2022. The collected data were analyzed utilizing SPSS and AMOS version 28.0. Results The statistical analysis led to the exclusion of three items from the original version, resulting in five subscales encompassing a total of 25 items. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated satisfactory model fit indices (normed χ2 =2.56, p<.001, RMR=.05, RMSEA=.07, GFI=.84, CFI=.86, TLI=.85, IFI=.87). The items' convergent and discriminant validity were verified using confirmed through the extracted mean variance (.54~.65) and composite reliability (.78~.90). The Cronbach's ⍺ value for the overall NEBPPRS-K instrument was .89, while the Cronbach's ⍺ value for each individual subscale ranged from .66 to .85. Conclusion The NEBPPRS-K25 is a valid and reliable scale, making it suitable for widespread use in measuring nurses' ethical behaviors to safeguard patient rights.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Psychometric evaluation of the Vietnamese version of nurses’ ethical behaviors for protecting patient rights scale (V-NEBPPRS): a methodological study Ninh Do Thi, Gunjeong Lee, Dian Susmarini BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Development of Ethical Competence Self-assessment Tool for Korean Physical Therapists JiYeon Cheon, MyungChul Kim, HaeIn Kim, Hyunsuk Kim The Open Public Health Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of Korean nurses' research participation experiences; their resulting consent satisfaction; pressure to participate; satisfaction in participating; and the factors influencing research participation satisfaction.
Methods A descriptive cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected using a questionnaire distributed to nurses who are employed at hospitals or higher medical institutions nationwide and have participated in nursing research at least once. 197 nurses participated in this study. 173 data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.
Results Senior nurses made the most participation requests (21.4%). The coercion to participate in the research (2.67±0.64) was lower than normal (3). However, the coercion level to participate in the study was significantly higher when notified by the institution or department (F=5.29, p<.001), the department head requested participation (F=5.17, p<.001), or senior nurses instructed other nurses to participate (F=7.96, p<.001). Satisfaction with informed consent (β=.55, p<.001) and coercion to participate in the research (F=93.16, p<.001) were significant variables influencing the satisfaction with research participation (R2=.52).
Conclusion In order to protect the rights of nurses as research participants, it is necessary to improve researcher awareness and quality of nursing research, as well as provide ethical research environments for research participants.
Purpose The aim of this study was to develop an Ethical Nursing Competence Self-rating Scale for Clinical Nurses.
Methods: A scale-development study was applied that comprised eight stages of DeVellis. The scale verification involved a convenience sample of 423 nurses from September to October 2019 at three general hospitals located in Korea. The content validity, factorial structure validity, item-convergent/discriminant validity, known-group validity, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability of the Ethical Nursing Competence Self-rating Scale for Clinical Nurses were evaluated. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT), Cronbach’s ⍺, and intraclass correlation coefficient.
Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded five-factors. Known-group validity was demonstrated by clinical experience and nursing ethics education experience. Convergent validity was demonstrated using measures of defining issue. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach’s ⍺ of .70~.85 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of .72~.89.
Conclusion: The Ethical Nursing Competence Self-rating Scale for Clinical Nurses is a new instrument that comprehensively measures the aspects of ethical behavior, ethical decision-making and action, ethical sensitivity, ethical reflection, and ethical knowledge. It consists of 20 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale. The validity and reliability of the scale were verified.
These findings indicate that the instrument can be applied in clinical practice, nursing education, and research.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of Clinical Nurses' Ethical Climate and Ethical Nursing Competence on Moral Distress Sun Mi Ha, Yeong Ju Yoon Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2025; 31(1): 25. CrossRef
Influence of Nurses' Moral Distress and Ethical Nursing Competence on Retention Intention Ji-Hyun Choi, Mi-Jin Byun, Thi Ninh Do Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2025; 31(1): 36. CrossRef
Assessing educational needs of nurses’ ethical competence based on the four components model of moral behaviour: a cross-sectional study using the Borich needs assessment and locus for focus models Kyunghee Ha, Younjae Oh BMC Nursing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of Patient Safety Management System, Leadership, and Communication Types on Nurse’ Patient Safety Management Activities Eunji Lee, Haejung Lee Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2024; 30(4): 367. CrossRef
Factors Influencing End-of-life Care Competency in Nursing
Students Jinryung Park, Minjeong Seo Korean Journal of Medical Ethics.2024; 27(4): 267. CrossRef
The Influence of Ethical Nursing Competence and Positive Nursing Organizational Culture on Person-Centered Care in Intensive Care Unit Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Survey Jae Eun Lee, Hye-Young Jang Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2024; 31(3): 304. CrossRef
Influence of Patient Safety Culture, Ethical Nursing Competence, and Nursing Professionalism on the Perception of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents among Nurses in Tertiary Hospitals Seulki Kim, Yoonju Lee Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2024; 30(4): 392. CrossRef
Development of Ethical Competence Self-assessment Tool for Korean Physical Therapists JiYeon Cheon, MyungChul Kim, HaeIn Kim, Hyunsuk Kim The Open Public Health Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Nurses’ intention to care of COVID-19 patients in hospitals dedicated to infectious disease in South Korea: application of the theory of planned behavior and verification of the moderating effect of ethical nursing competence Mira Mo, Seongmi Moon, Eun Kyeung Song BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Nurses' Ethical Behaviors for Protecting Patient's Rights Scale: A Methodological Study Jihye Yun, Heeyoung Oh Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2023; 35(2): 138. CrossRef
Influencing Factors of Death Perception and Self-efficacy on Meaning in Life in Nurses who Experienced End of Life Care Hee Jung Hong, Sung Hee Choi, Bok Soon Shin The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing.2023; 26(1): 49. CrossRef
Types of Perception toward Ethical Issues in Perioperative Nurses: Q-Methodological Approach Jin Nam Kim, Seok Hee Jeong Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2018; 48(6): 679. CrossRef
Influence of Information Literacy and Perception of Patient Data Privacy on Ethical Values among Hospital Clinical Nurses Hyung-Eun Seo, Eun-Young Doo, Sujin Choi, Miyoung Kim Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2017; 23(1): 52. CrossRef
PURPOSE This study attempted to analyze problems of informed consent in the clinical setting and appraise ethical aspects inherent in such issues in order to boost awareness of informed consent and its implementation among healthcare professionals. METHODS Study methods included identifying ethical meanings of informed consent in the clinical setting based on the principal ethics, and exploring the process of informed consent utilizing communicative ethics and feminine care ethics RESULTS: The ethical basis of informed consent encompasses not only respect for autonomy but also prohibiting malice, practicing beneficience, and establishing justice. These principles, however, are limited in illustrating the ethical aspects of communicative ethics and care ethics that are entailed in informed consent within clinical settings. The ethical meaning of informed consent involves a communicative and caring process between healthcare professionals, patients, and family built on mutual respect. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals must fully understand the ethical meanings of informed consent and in turn respect and protect the clients' right to know and making decisions. Nurses especially, must take on the role of mediator and advocate throughout the process of obtaining informed consent, and practice ethical caring by facilitating communication grounded in mutual understanding among the physician, patient, and family members.