Purpose This descriptive correlational study aimed to evaluate the impact of patient activation on self-management and explore the mediating role of shared decision-making (SDM) among patients on hemodialysis.
Methods A cohort of 136 participants was recruited from hemodialysis units in Gwangju, South Korea, between August 9 and 22, 2024. Patient activation, self-management, and SDM were assessed using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), the Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HDMI-K), and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), respectively. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and mediation analysis using the PROCESS macro were conducted to analyze the data.
Results Patient activation, SDM, and self-management were positively correlated with one another. Mediation analysis showed that patient activation significantly predicted both SDM and self-management. SDM also significantly predicted self-management, confirming its partial mediating effect. The final model explained 54.5% of the variance in self-management. The indirect effect of patient activation on self-management through SDM was statistically significant (indirect effect=0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.02–0.10). The indirect effect of patient activation on self-management through SDM was statistically significant (indirect effect=0.05, 95% CI=0.02–0.10).
Conclusion Patient activation directly and indirectly enhances self-management through SDM, verifying the partial mediating role of SDM. Integrating SDM into nursing interventions is essential for effectively supporting self-management in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
PURPOSE As advanced medical care has resulted in the unintended consequence of prolonging deaths, there is a growing interest in the decision to withhold life-sustaining treatments. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with the decision to withhold life-sustaining treatments in middle-aged and older adults who die in hospital in the United States. METHODS This cross-sectional correlational study conducted secondary analysis of 2000–2012 exit interview data from the Health and Retirement Study. Adults aged 50 and older who died in hospital and who had made a decision regarding life-sustaining treatments were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors related to the decision to withhold life-sustaining treatments. RESULTS Among 1,412 adults, the prevalence of the decision to withhold life-sustaining treatments was 61.1%. Significant factors associated with the decision to withhold life-sustaining treatments were being African American (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]=0.50, 95% Confidential Interval [CI]=0.30~0.86), Catholic (AOR=0.5, 95% CI=0.32~0.93), having at least one private insurance policy (AOR=1.40, 95% CI=1.02~1.92), having a living will (AOR=1.71, 95% CI=1.04~2.83), and having discussed end-of-life care with someone (AOR=1.810, 95% CI=1.25~2.62). CONCLUSION Differences in race and religious affiliation should be considered when older adults, family members, and health care providers make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments at the end-of-life. Also, health insurance coverage for advance care planning makes it easier for people to discuss life-sustaining treatments with health care providers.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to explore how knowledge management of hospital and nurses' beliefs and competences on evidence-based practice can affect evidence-based decision making. METHODS In this descriptive study, a total of 184 nurses who were working in the five general hospitals participated. The data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire in September, 2014. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, and step-wise multiple regression with SPSS/WIN Statistics 21.0 program. RESULTS Evidence-based decision making was correlated with EBP beliefs (r=.55, p<.001), EBP competence (r=.57, p<.001), and knowledge management (r=.50, p<.001). Hierarchical regression analysis showed that EBP beliefs (β=.18, p=.005), EBP competence (β=.37, p<.001), organizational knowledge management (beta=.27, p<.001) explained 48.6% of evidence based decision making (p<.001). CONCLUSION The study results indicated that evidence-based practice competences, organizational knowledge management, and evidence-based practice beliefs were important factors on evidence-based decision making. In order to improve evidence-based practice among nurses through organizational knowledge management, EBP beliefs and competence at individual level need to be considered and incorporated into any systemic training of EBP.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Influence of Nursing Students’ Competencies Who Participated in Simulation Training on Competency with Evidence-based Practice Yeon Jeong Su Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing.2024; 12(1): 33. CrossRef
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the National Health Service Sustainability Model to the Chinese healthcare context Jie Lai, Lynne Maher, Chaixiu Li, Chunlan Zhou, Hasan Alelayan, Jiaqi Fu, Yanni Wu BMC Nursing.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the performance of an integrated evidence-based nursing knowledge management (I-EBNKM) platform in real-world clinical environments Myonghwa Park, Insook Jang, Sung Lim Kim, Wonjae Lim, Ga Ae Kim, Gyeongho Bae, Yerin Kim International Journal of Medical Informatics.2023; 179: 105239. CrossRef
Barriers to implementing evidence-based nursing practice from the hospitals' point of view in China: A regional cross-sectional study Jie Lai, Alison Brettle, Yingjie Zhang, Chunlan Zhou, Chaixiu Li, Jiaqi Fu, Yanni Wu Nurse Education Today.2022; 116: 105436. CrossRef
Development and Effectiveness of Practice Application Program of Intravenous Infusion Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Guideline - for Small and Medium Sized Hospitals Inhwa Hong, Young Eun Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2020; 50(6): 863. CrossRef
Influences of Critical Thinking Disposition, Nurse Managers' Transformation and Transactional Leadership Style on Nurses' Competency with Evidence Based Practice Geum Ah Lee, Sung Hee Shin, Suk Jeong Ko Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2020; 26(4): 305. CrossRef
Clinical nurses’ beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture Jae Yong Yoo, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Sun Kim, Hyun Lye Kim, Jung Suk Ki, Tim Schultz PLOS ONE.2019; 14(12): e0226742. CrossRef
Factors associated with Oncology Nurses' Adherence to Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia Guidelines based on Pender's Health Promotion Model Gyeong-Jin Kim, Ja Yun Choi Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2019; 31(4): 389. CrossRef
Effects of an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Education Program on EBP Practice Readiness and EBP Decision Making in Clinical Nurses Ae Ri Na Nam, Eun Ho Lee, Jeong Ok Park, Eun Jung Ki, Su Min Nam, Mi Mi Park Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2017; 23(3): 239. CrossRef
Heat Application According to Nurse's Belief on Evidence-Based Practice and Behavioral Intention Related to Research Sukyung Yoon, Yong Soon Shin Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2016; 23(3): 264. CrossRef
Factors Influencing Nurses’ Implementation of Evidence-based Restraint Use in Long-term Care Hospitals Myonghwa Park, Mi Hwa Park Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2016; 18(3): 172. CrossRef
PURPOSE Knowledge, clinical reasoning, and self-confidence are the basis for undergraduate education, and determine students\' level of competence. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the addition of a one-time simulation experience to the didactic curriculum on nursing students' knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning skill, and self-confidence. METHODS Using a quasi-experimental crossover design consisted of intervention and wait-list control groups. Participants were non-randomly assigned to the first intervention group (Group A, n=48) or the wait-list control group (Group B, n=46). Knowledge level was assessed through a multiple choice written test, and clinical reasoning skill was measured using a nursing process model-based rubric. Self-confidence was measured using a self-reported questionnaire. RESULTS Results indicated that students in the simulation group scored significantly higher on clinical reasoning skill and related knowledge than those in the didactic lecture group; no difference was found for self-confidence. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that undergraduate nursing education requires a simulation-based curriculum for clinical reasoning development and knowledge acquisition.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of Discussion-Based Legality-Focused Nursing Record Education on Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Self-Confidence, and Nursing Record Performance Dohye Kim, Kyoungrim Kang, Jeongyeong Jeon Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2025; 32(1): 14. CrossRef
Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review Hege Vistven Stenseth, Simen A Steindal, Marianne Trygg Solberg, Mia Alexandra Ølnes, Anne Lene Sørensen, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Camilla Olaussen, Caroline Farsjø Aure, Ingunn Pedersen, Jaroslav Zlamal, Jussara Gue Martini, Paula Bresolin, Silje Christi Journal of Medical Internet Research.2025; 27: e58744. CrossRef
Strategies to develop clinical reasoning in nursing students: A structured review Adele Neethling, Lizeth Roets Health SA Gesondheid.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria dos Anjos Dixe Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Estudio comparativo entre simulación de alta fidelidad y simulación de mediana fidelidad en la toma de decisiones de estudiantes de enfermería: estudio experimental Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria dos Anjos Dixe Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Using "board games" to improve the effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care for nurses in intensive care unit Hsin-Yi Wang, Chu-Yu Huang, Sophia H. Hu, Su-Fen Cheng Nurse Education in Practice.2024; 75: 103895. CrossRef
The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: Systematic review and meta-analysis Selçuk Görücü, Gülengün Türk, Zekiye Karaçam Nurse Education Today.2024; 140: 106270. CrossRef
Estudo comparativo entre simulação de alta-fidelidade e simulação de média-fidelidade na tomada de decisão de estudantes de enfermagem: estudo experimental Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria dos Anjos Dixe Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of high-fidelity simulation airway management training program on nursing students’ performance, satisfaction, and self-confidence in Palestine Ahmad Mohammad Sati Hodrob, Malakeh Z. Malak, Ahmad Ayed Interactive Learning Environments.2024; 32(1): 325. CrossRef
Impact Of Simulation Design Elements on Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Matthew Jackson, Lauren McTier, Laura A. Brooks, Rochelle Wynne Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2024; 89: 101519. CrossRef
Student Nurses’ Perceptions of the Role of High-Fidelity Simulation in Developing Decision-Making Skills for Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Research Study Naim Abdulmohdi, Andrew McVicar SAGE Open Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education for Caring Patients with COVID-19 Min Hye Lee, Eun-Young Noh Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2023; 53(4): 397. CrossRef
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning While Attending Critical Care Postsimulation Reflective Learning Conversation Emad Almomani, Jacqueline Sullivan, Jisha Samuel, Ahmed Maabreh, Natalie Pattison, Guillaume Alinier Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing.2023; 42(2): 63. CrossRef
Development and assessment of a curriculum model for virtual simulation in nursing: curriculum development and pilot-evaluation Hyunsook Shin, Dahae Rim BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of simulation design on stress, anxiety and self‐confidence of nursing students: Systematic review with meta‐analysis George Oliveira Silva, Flavia Silva e Oliveira, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Flaviana Vely Mendonça Vieira, Suzanne Hetzel Campbell, Natália Del Angelo Aredes Journal of Clinical Nursing.2023; 32(17-18): 5668. CrossRef
The Use of Simulation in Audiology Education: A Systematic Review Ahmad A. Alanazi, Nannette Nicholson American Journal of Audiology.2023; 32(3): 640. CrossRef
Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process Nargess Ramazanzadeh, Akram Ghahramanian, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Leila Valizadeh, Saeideh Ghaffarifar BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Curricular Quality Improvement in Midwifery: Simulating Unexpected Perinatal Loss Susan D. Altman, Charles P. Tilley, Rebecca Feldman, Mary Brennan, Dorothy Wholihan Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health.2023; 68(4): 523. CrossRef
Yüksek Gerçeklikli Simülasyon Yönteminin Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Anjinalı Hastanın Hemşirelik Bakımına Yönelik Bilgi ve Klinik Karar Verme Düzeyine Etkisi Gülcan Coşkun, Şerife Karagözoğlu Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 10(2): 135. CrossRef
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students' clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review Fadiyah D. Alshehri, Sophie Jones, Denise Harrison Nurse Education Today.2023; 121: 105679. CrossRef
Clinical reasoning in emergency medical technicians and its compliance with the illness script theory: A pilot study Hamidreza Miri, Elham Boushehri, Maryam Hoseini-Abardeh, Shahram Yazdani Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementation Methods of Virtual Reality Simulation and the Impact on Confidence and Stress When Learning Patient Resuscitation: An Integrative Review Jessica Wood, Lyn Ebert, Jed Duff Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2022; 66: 5. CrossRef
Effect of simulation on stress, anxiety, and self-confidence in nursing students: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression George Oliveira Silva, Flavia Silva e Oliveira, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Flaviana Vely Mendonça Vieira, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Suzanne Hetzel Campbell, Natália Del Angelo Aredes International Journal of Nursing Studies.2022; 133: 104282. CrossRef
Comparing the Stress, Anxiety, and Learning Effects of Leaders and Team Members in High Fidelity Nursing Simulation Eun Jeong Ko, Eun Jung Kim Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2022; 70: 14. CrossRef
Effects of preobserving peers’ performance on students’ anxiety, perceived competency, and satisfaction during a clinical simulation: A quasiexperimental study Sun-Hee Kim, Eun Jung Kim Nurse Education in Practice.2022; 62: 103384. CrossRef
Development and evaluation of virtual reality simulation education based on coronavirus disease 2019 scenario for nursing students: A pilot study Younhee Jeong, Hanna Lee, Jeong‐Won Han Nursing Open.2022; 9(2): 1066. CrossRef
Impact of Virtual Simulation on Nursing Students’ Self-Efficacy Louise Comer SSRN Electronic Journal .2021;[Epub] CrossRef
An integrative review of simulation, senior practicum and readiness for practice Michele Ragsdale, Jenny B. Schuessler Nurse Education in Practice.2021; 55: 103087. CrossRef
Exploring perceptions and barriers in developing critical thinking and clinical reasoning of nursing students: A qualitative study Su Hui Valynn Wong, Yanika Kowitlawakul Nurse Education Today.2020; 95: 104600. CrossRef
Neurological Assessment Using a Physical-Virtual Patient (PVP) Laura Gonzalez, Salam Daher, Greg Welch Simulation & Gaming.2020; 51(6): 802. CrossRef
‘Ward for the day’: A case study of extended immersive ward-based simulation Hugh Davies, Rebecca Schultz, Deb Sundin, Elisabeth Jacob Nurse Education Today.2020; 90: 104430. CrossRef
The effectiveness of critical thinking instructional strategies in health professions education: a systematic review Rita Payan-Carreira, Gonçalo Cruz, Ioanna V. Papathanasiou, Evangelos Fradelos, Lai Jiang Studies in Higher Education.2019; 44(5): 829. CrossRef
Effect of case study versus video simulation on nursing students' satisfaction, self-confidence, and knowledge: A quasi-experimental study Elizabeth K. Herron, Kelly Powers, Lauren Mullen, Brandi Burkhart Nurse Education Today.2019; 79: 129. CrossRef
Creating a Simulation Experience to Promote Clinical Judgment Melody D. Reibel, Melanie Cason, Sarah Screws Teaching and Learning in Nursing.2019; 14(4): 298. CrossRef
Effects of Simulation-Based Education before Clinical Experience on Knowledge, Clinical Practice Anxiety, and Clinical Performance Ability in Nursing Students Eun Jeong Ko, Eun Jung Kim Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education.2019; 25(3): 289. CrossRef
Comparison of the effects of two different teaching methods in blood pressure measurement training: a randomized controlled study Banu Terzi, Eylem Topbaş, Gülay Bingöl, Saadet Gonca Mavi Aydoğdu Blood Pressure Monitoring.2019; 24(6): 294. CrossRef
Effect of simulation-based emergency cardiac arrest education on nursing students' self-efficacy and critical thinking skills: Roleplay versus lecture Eunsook Kim Nurse Education Today.2018; 61: 258. CrossRef
Nursing Students Managing Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kristine Haddeland, Åshild Slettebø, Patricia Carstens, Mariann Fossum Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2018; 21: 1. CrossRef
Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation Kelly Macauley Health Professions Education.2018; 4(4): 278. CrossRef
Using high fidelity simulation to increase nursing students' clinical postpartum and newborn assessment proficiency: A mixed-methods research study Melva Craft-Blacksheare, Youvalanda Frencher Nurse Education Today.2018; 71: 198. CrossRef
Clinical Simulation for Practicing Labor and Delivery Nurses: Advancing Competency through Simulated Nursing Practice Lynn C. Parsons, Teresa D. Ferguson, Teresa L. Howell POJ Nursing Practice & Research.2017; 1(3): 1. CrossRef
Effect of Team Debriefing in Simulation-based Cardiac Arrest Emergency Nursing Education SangJin Ko, Eun-Hee Choi Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2017; 29(6): 667. CrossRef
Systematic Review of Assessments That Evaluate Clinical Decision Making, Clinical Reasoning, and Critical Thinking Changes After Simulation Participation Kelly Macauley, Tracy J. Brudvig, Manasvi Kadakia, Madeleine Bonneville Journal of Physical Therapy Education.2017; 31(4): 64. CrossRef
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument developed by Lauri & Salantera(2002). METHODS The subjects were 247 nurses working in eight hospitals of Korea. Data were collected by questionnaires from June to July, 2012 and were analyzed by Principal Component Analysis for construct validity and Cronbach's . coefficient for reliability. RESULTS Factor loadings of the four subscales ranged from .32 to .73. The explained variance from the four factors was 48.54% of the total variance. The factors were named 'implementation of plan, monitoring and evaluation', 'plans of action', 'data collection', and 'data processing and identification'. The first factor consisted of 6 items which explained 13.21% of the total variance and the second factor contained 8 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the four subscales were from .64 to .81. CONCLUSION The Korean version of the shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument has satisfactory construct validity and reliability. However, that the scores of the analytic items weren't reversed unlike the analysis method of the original tools is the biggest limitation of this study. In addition, based on the fact that there were several discrepancies for item interpretation of Korean comparing to the findings of the instrument development study, repetitive researches would be suggested.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Development of a Korean clinical decision-making ability scale for hospital nurses Sunyoung Oh, Minkyung Gu, Sohyune Sok BMC Nursing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese Ivo Cristiano Soares Paiva, Teresa Margarida Almeida Neves, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos Ventura, António Carlos Lopes Vilela, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges Moreira SAGE Open Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Communication training program for nurses caring for patients with aphasia: a quasi-experimental study Yujin Hur, Younhee Kang BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Work climate from the perspective of nurses: qualitative research Justyna Kosydar-Bochenek, Sabina Krupa, Tomasz Semań, Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A Concept Analysis of Nurses’ Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea Sunyoung Oh, Minkyung Gu, Sohyune Sok International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(6): 3596. CrossRef
Canonical correlations between individual self-efficacy/organizational bottom-up approach and perceived barriers to reporting medication errors: a multicenter study Myoung Soo Kim, Chul-Hoon Kim BMC Health Services Research.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify the process of experience toward decision making to donate organs. METHOD Eleven subjects who registered at the Association for Organ Sharing in Korea were recruited. Using in-depth interviews and tape-recordings, data was collected from Jun. 2001 to Feb. 2002 and the contents of these were analyzed by Glaser's grounded theory analysis method. RESULT Basic Social- Psychological Problem(BSPP) of subjects were 'attachment to body' and the core theme, that is Basic Socialization Progress(BSP) were discovered to 'find out what is the meaning of life'. Also it consisted of four steps: 1st 'hesitate', 2nd 'look into self', 3rd 'realize the tie up to self' and last 're-find the meaning of life'. CONCLUSION These findings indicate the Korean's Basic Socialization Progress of decision making regarding organ donation, so possible development of promoting decision making is necessary strategies for people who is having his/her potential of organ donation in mind.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the differences of the process of change, decision making, self-efficacy and perception of subjective health according to the stages of exercise behaviors suggested by transtheoretical models among older adults. METHOD The subjects consisted of 291 older adults. Trained research assistants interviewed the older adults using structured questionnaires. ANOVA analyses with post hoc test were used to examine the mean differences for each stage of exercise behavior using SPSS for windows. RESULT The subjects were divided into five stages of exercise behavior: 24.4% pre-contemplation, 12.4% contemplation, 17.9% preparation, 12.4% action, 33.0% maintenance stage. There were significant differences in process of change, decision making, self-efficacy and subjective health perception according to the exercise stage of change. 'Self-liberation' and 'stimulus control' were important strategies for intention of exercise, while 'reinforcing management' for the actual practice of exercise. 'Self-efficacy' was an effective strategy to change older adults from pre-contemplation to preparation stage. CONCLUSION For exercise intervention, older adults should be classified into groups according to their stages of exercise behaviors and provided effective individualized intervention depending on their stage.
The purpose of this study was to understand how living-related kidney donors experience to donate a kidney using the Grounded Theory method. Total of 11 kidney donors were participated in the study. Semi-structured individual interviews were utilized to gather data. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Constant comparative analysis was employed using the NUDIST4.0 software program. As a result of analysis "process of decision making" was identified as a core category and the process consists of three stages; the initial, the intermediary, and the last stages. Ten subcategories emerged as important in this process; 1) preceding factors, 2) direct factors, 3) indirect factors, 4) donor characteristics I, 5) wish to give (a kidney), 6) motives and momentums to donate, 7) interfering factors, 8) facilitating factors, 9) donor characteristics II and the 10) final decision to donate. During the initial stage, the donors recognize their wish to give a kidney to the recipient, and the first five subcategories were related to this stage. The intermediary stage is an action stage which involves taking the tests of tissue compatibility with the recipient. The next four categories were related to the intermediary stage. The last stage starts when the donors finally decide to donate a kidney and ends with the operation. The results of this study highlight difficulties and problems, as well as motives and other facilitating factors that people experience to donate a living-related kidney. The results of this study might help nurses and other health care workers make effective interventions to facilitate the decision making process for living-related kidney donors. They might also help in establishing appropriate standards and criteria for the psychosocial aspects of living-related kidney donations.