• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Evaluation of a Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tool(I)

Yeong Kyeong Kim
Korean J Adult Nurs 1997;9(2):272-285.
Published online: August 31, 1997
  • 12 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the applicability of pressure ulcer risk assessment tool ; the tool used was that developed by Cubbin and Jackson(1991). The subjects of this study were 253 patients in intensive care units. Data were prospectively collected from Feb 21 to June 10, 1997. Data were analyzed by mean, percentage, chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and stepwise multiple regression. The results of the study are as follows : 1. The factors that will predict pressure ulcer development are general skin condition, incontinence, age and hygiene, and there is a positive relationship between low scoring and pressure ulcer development. 2. The prevalence of the pressure ulcer is 38.3%, and the incidence of the pressure ulcer is 21.7%. 3. The most common pressure ulcer site is the sacrum(64.1%) and the next is the heel(7.69%). 4. Additional pressure ulcer risk factors are hemoglobin level and admission period.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Evaluation of a Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tool(I)
J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 1997;9(2):272-285.   Published online August 31, 1997
Download Citation
Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
  • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
  • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
Include:
  • Citation for the content below
Evaluation of a Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tool(I)
J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 1997;9(2):272-285.   Published online August 31, 1997
Close
TOP