• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Evaluating the Predictive Validity for the New Pressure Sores Risk Assessment Scale

Si Sook Kim, Kyung Sook Choi
Korean J Adult Nurs 2004;16(2):183-190.
Published online: June 30, 2004
1Chung-Ang University Hospital, Korea.
2Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Korea.
  • 10 Views
  • 0 Download
next

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was To exam the skin and pressure sore and To evaluate the predictive validity for the new pressure sores risk assessment scale. METHOD: There was finally 211 neurosurgery subject admitted in Chung-Ang Univ. Hospital from Nov, 11, 2002 to Feb, 11, 2003. Data was collected three times per week from 48-72hr after admission until incidence of pressure sores or discharge or die. Inclusion criteria were; (1) no pressure sores at admittance, (2) at least 3 times assessment, (3) adults older than 16yrs, (4) patients consent to participate in study. RESULT: 1. 34 case of 211 developed pressure sores(11.6%). 2. The coccyx area was the most common occurrence site of pressure sores. 3. At the cutoff point 23 of sensitivity 100%, specificity 76.3% was higher in 2003 than specificity 63.8% at the cutoff point 26 of sencitivity 100% in 1991. 4. "Moisture" of subscale for pressure sores risk factor was the strongest predictor. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the New Pressure Sores Risk Assessment Scale still predict the risk of developing pressure sores in neurosurgical subject.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Evaluating the Predictive Validity for the New Pressure Sores Risk Assessment Scale
J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2004;16(2):183-190.   Published online June 30, 2004
Download Citation
Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
  • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
  • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
Include:
  • Citation for the content below
Evaluating the Predictive Validity for the New Pressure Sores Risk Assessment Scale
J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2004;16(2):183-190.   Published online June 30, 2004
Close
TOP