• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Research

The Impact of Acculturation and Social Support on Mental Health among Korean-American Registered Nurses

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2013;25(2):157-169.
Published online: April 18, 2013

1Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul

2Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Kim, Miyoung Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3277-6694, Fax: +82-2-3277-2850, E-mail: mykim0808@ewha.ac.kr
• Received: April 8, 2013   • Accepted: April 22, 2013

© 2013 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 18 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study was to examine the impact of acculturation and social support on the mental health among Korean-American registered nurses.
  • Methods
    Data were collected with a convenience sample of 203 Korean-American registered nurses living in New York state and New Jersey state from 8th May to 25th August in 2012. The structured questionnaires measured the degree of acculturation, social support, and mental health. Data analysis was conducted using t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation efficient, and Stepwise multiple regression.
  • Results
    Lower level of integration and higher level of marginalization were associated with the lower mental health. Social support was also positively related to mental health and had mediating effect on the relationship between acculturation and mental health. The five variables, including participants’ educational background, work shift, integration, marginalization, and social support were significant to predict the level of mental health among Korean-American registered nurses, accounting for 41% of the variability.
  • Conclusion
    The results imply that higher level of social support and strong identity of both home and host culture will enable Korean-American registered nurses to maintain sound mental health.
Figure 1.
The mediation effect on the relationship between acculturation and mental health.
kjan-25-157f1.jpg
Table 1.
The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (N=203)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD Assimilation Separation Integration Margination Social support Mental health
M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t t or F p M±SD t or F p
Age (year) <35 52 (25.6) 2.4±0.4 1.87 .136 2.9±0.4 0.26 . .851 3.1±0.5 2.15 .096 2.1±0.5 0.94 .421 3.4±0.3 2.38 .071 2.0±0.3 0.38 .770
35~44 59 (29.1) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
45~54 58 (28.6) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
≥55 34 (16.8) 2.5±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.4±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.5±0.4 2.1±0.3
  43.2±10.1            
Gender Male 4 (2.0) 2.3±0.5 -0.13 .897 3.0±0.5 0.16 .874 3.2±0.6 -0.78 .435 2.2±0.5 1.08 .280 3.4±0.4 0.37 .713 2.0±0.3 0.89 .373
Female 199 (98.0) 2.4±0.4     2.9±0.4     3.4±0.6     1.9±0.2     3.3±0.4     1.9±0.4    
Marital status Singlea 73 (36.0) 2.3±0.5 4.37 .014 3.0±0.4 0.20 . .822 3.1±0.5 0.88 .417 2.3±0.5 2.02 .136 3.3±0.4 0.85 .430 2.1±0.3 1.03 .360
Marriedb 120 (59.1) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
Othersc 10 (4.9) 2.1±0.4 2.9±0.6 3.1±0.8 2.4±0.6 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
Religion Protestant 120 (59.1) 2.3±0.5 0.42 .741 3.0±0.4 2.67 . .049 3.1±0.6 1.05 .373 2.2±0.5 0.64 .589 3.4±0.4 1.68 .173 2.0±0.3 0.99 .400
Catholic 41 (20.2) 2.4±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.3±0.5 2.3±0.6 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
Buddhism 16 (7.9) 2.4±0.6 2.9±0.4 3.3±0.5 2.2±0.4 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.2
None 26 (12.8) 2.4±0.4 2.8±0.4 3.1±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.2±0.4 2.1±0.4
Educational background 3-year collegea 97 (47.8) 2.4±0.5 0.33 .806 2.9±0.5 0.43 . .735 3.2±0.6 1.99 .116 2.2±0.5 2.93 .035 3.4±0.4 0.87 .456 2.0±0.3 2.70 .047
Bachelor degreeb 67 (33.0) 2.3±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.1±0.5 2.3±0.4 c>d 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3 b, c>d
≥Master degreec 24 (11.8) 2.4±0.6 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.4±0.6 3.5±0.4 2.1±0.3
NHSd 15 (7.4) 2.3±0.4 2.9±0.5 3.5±0.8 2.0±0.6 3.5±0.4 1.8±0.4
Nursing experience in Korea (year) <3a 54 (26.6) 2.4±0.4 0.33 .800 2.9±0.4 0.83 . .481 3.3±0.7 1.48 .220 2.1±0.5 4.20 .007 3.4±0.4 3.11 .028 2.0±0.3 1.31 .273
3~<6b 57 (28.1) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.5 2.2±0.5 d>a 3.5±0.3 2.0±0.3
6~<9c 45 (22.2) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
≥9d 47 (23.2) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.4±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
  6.0±5.1            

NHS=nursing high school.

Table 1.
The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (Continued) (N=203)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD Assimilation Separation Integration Margination Social support Mental health
M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p
Nursing experience in the U.S (year) <1a 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.3 7.01 <.001 2.8±0.5 1.89 .132 2.9±0.5 8.52 <.001 2.1±0.5 1.48 .221 3.4±0.4 0.54 .654 1.9±0.3 0.66 .576
1~<5b 73 (36.0) 2.3±0.5 d>c 2.9±0.4 3.1±0.5 d>a, b, c 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
5~<10c 64 (31.5) 2.2±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.2±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.0±0.3
≥10d 52 (25.6) 2.5±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.5±0.5 2.1±0.4 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
  8.3±8.5            
Current position GRSa 183 (90.2) 2.3±0.5 0.50 .606 3.0±0.4 0.61 . .545 3.1±0.6 8.64 <.001 2.3±0.5 6.00 .003 3.4±0.4 3.77 .025 2.1±0.3 2.86 .060
Nurse managerb 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.4 2.8±0.5 3.7±0.4 b>a 1.8±0.4 3.6±0.4 1.9±0.4
Nurse practitionerc 6 (3.0) 2.5±0.3 3.0±0.4 3.6±0.5 1.9±0.4 3.6±0.3 1.8±0.2
Work shift Per daya 137 (67.5) 2.4±0.5 1.39 .247 3.0±0.5 1.66 . .176 3.2±0.5 3.98 <.001 2.2±0.5 2.37 .072 3.4±0.4 1.41 .240 2.0±0.3 2.97 .033
Per eveningb 12 (5.9) 2.6±0.5 2.7±0.4 3.4±0.5 2.3±0.6 3.4±0.5 2.1±0.4 d>a, b, c
Per nightc 40 (19.7) 2.3±0.4 3.0±0.5 3.0±0.6 2.3±0.6 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.4
Rotating/Per diemd 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.6 3.1±0.3 2.9±0.7 2.4±0.5 3.2±0.4 2.3±0.2
Working hours (per week) <30 34 (16.8) 2.3±0.5 0.90 .410 2.9±0.4 0.23 .791 3.1±0.5 1.34 .264 2.3±0.5 1.97 .142 3.3±0.4 0.32 .730 2.1±0.3 0.61 .543
30~40 101 (49.8) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.1±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
>40 68 (33.5) 2.4±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.5 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
Annual income (US dollar) <50,000a 46 (22.7) 12.4±0.4 0.88 .455 3.0±0.4 0.36 .780 3.0±0.5 6.10 <.001 2.2±0.5 2.49 .061 3.4±0.4 2.07 .105 2.0±0.4 0.61 .610
50,000~<75,000b 50 (24.6) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.0±0.5 d>a, b 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
75,000~<90,000c 51 (25.1) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
≥90,0000d 56 (27.6) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.4±0.6 2.1±0.5 3.5±0.4 2.0±0.3
Current visa Citizena 69 (34.0) 2.4±0.5 3.44 .018 3.0±0.5 1.44 . .231 3.4±0.5 5.75 <.001 2.1±0.5 5.43 .001 3.5±0.4 4.73 .003 2.0±0.3 0.64 .589
Permanent residentb 69 (34.0) 2.3±0.5 a>d 3.0±0.4 3.1±0.6 a>d 2.3±0.5 d>c, a 3.3±0.4 a>d 2.1±0.3
Student/CPTc 55 (27.1) 2.4±0.3 2.9±0.4 3.1±0.4 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
OPTd 10 (4.9) 2.0±0.4 3.0±0.6 2.9±0.6 2.6±0.6 3.1±0.4 2.1±0.3

GRS=general registered nurse; CPT=curricular practical training; OPT=optional practical training.

Table 2.
Levels of Acculturation, Social Support, and Menta Health (N=203
Variables n (%) or M±SD Items
Acculturation    
  Assimilation 2.3±0.5 8
  Separation 3.0±0.5 7
  Integration 3.2±0.6 5
  Marginalization 2.2±0.6 9
Social support 3.4±0.4 21
Mental health 2.0±0.3 20
  ≥13 4 (2.0)  
  <13 199 (98.0)  
Table 3.
Correlations among Acculturation, Social Support, Mental Health (N=203)
Variables Categories Mental health Assimilation Separation Integration Marginalization
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
Acculturation Assimilation -.10 (.160) 1      
Separation .10 (.136) -.30 (<.001) 1    
Integration -.30 (<.001) .51 (<.001) -.24 (.001) 1  
Marginalization .56 (<.001) -.10 (.153) .21 (.003) -0.36 (<.001) 1
Social support   -.52 (<.001) .22 (.001) -.12 (.078) 0.26 (<.001) -0.43 (<.001)
Table 4.
Levels of Health Perception and Related Variables (N=203)
Model Categories B SE β t p Collinearity statistics
Tolerance VIF Adj. R2 F (p)
Model 1   (Constant) 40.21 0.68 .05 59.15 <.001     .06 3.04 (.007)
  Bachelor degree 0.61 1.00 .04 0.61 .543 .85 1.18
  Master degree 0.69 1.41 -.19 0.49 .624 .91 1.10
  Nursing high school -4.58 1.74 .08 -2.63 .009 .90 1.11
  Evening shift 2.25 1.91 .05 1.18 .241 .92 1.09
  Night shift 0.82 1.11 .21 0.74 .463 .95 1.05
  Rotating/per diem 5.18 1.73   3.00 .003 .97 1.03
Model 2   (Constant) 30.36 3.37 .00 9.00 <.001     .32 16.65 (<.001)
  Bachelor degree 0.11 0.85 .01 0.14 .892 .84 1.18
  Master degree -0.86 1.21 -.04 -0.71 .476 .88 1.14
  Nursing high school -2.51 1.49 -.10 -1.68 .095 .88 1.14
  Evening shift 1.38 1.63 .05 0.85 .399 .91 1.10
  Night shift -0.55 0.96 -.03 -0.57 .567 .91 1.09
  Rotating/per diem 3.06 1.49 .12 2.05 .041 .94 1.06
  Integration -0.21 0.14 -.10 -1.49 .138 .82 1.22
  Marginalization 0.70 0.09 .50 7.78 <.001 .81 1.23
Model 3   (Constant) 51.26 4.96 .00 10.33 <.001     .41 16.65 (<.001)
  Bachelor degree 0.16 0.79 .01 0.20 .843 .84 1.18
  Master degree 0.10 1.14 .01 0.09 .929 .86 1.17
  Nursing high school -2.65 1.39 -.11 -1.90 .059 .88 1.14
  Evening shift 1.49 1.52 .06 0.98 .328 .91 1.10
  Night shift -0.67 0.90 -.04 -0.75 .457 .91 1.09
  Rotating/Per diem 2.72 1.39 .11 1.96 .052 .94 1.07
  Integration -0.14 0.13 -.06 -1.06 .290 .81 1.23
  Marginalization 0.51 0.09 .36 5.57 <.001 .69 1.45
  Social support -0.26 0.05 -.33 -5.45 <.001 .78 1.28
  • Abraido-Lanz A. F., Chao M. T., Florez K. R.. 2005;Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Social Science & Medicine. 61(6):1243-1255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.016.
  • Ahn J. H.. 2007;A path analysis of the relationship between migratory grief and depression among older Korean immigrants in the U.S. Mental Health & Social Work. 26:219-253.
  • Atri A., Matorin A., Ruiz P.. 2011;Integration of international medical graduates in U.S. psychiatry: The role of acculturation and social support. Academic Psychiatry. 35(1):21-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.1.21.
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A.. 1986;The moderator-medicator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6):1173-1182.
  • Barry D. T.. 2001;Development of a new scale for measuring acculturation: The East Asian Acculturation Measure (EAAM). Journal of Immigrant Health. 3(4):193-197.
  • Berry J. W.. 1980. Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In: Padilla A. M.. Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings. p. 9-25. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Berry J. W.. 2003. Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In: Chun K. M., Organista P. B., Martin G., editors. Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. p. 17-38. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Brunero S., Smith J., Bates E.. 2008;Expectations and experiences of recently recruited overseas-qualified nurses in Australia. Contemporary Nurse. 28(1-2):101-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.28.1-2.101.
  • Cemalcilar Z., Falbo T.. 2008;A longitudinal study of the adaptation of international students in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 39(6):799-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022108323787.
  • Chae M. H., Foley P. F.. 2010;Relationship of ethnic identity, acculturation, and psychological well-being among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Americans. Journal of Counseling & Development. 88(4):466-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00047.x.
  • Chiang V., Crickmore B. L.. 2009;Improving English proficiency of post-graduate international nursing students seeking further qualifications and continuing education in foreign countries. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 40(7):329-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20090623-03.
  • Deegan J., Simkin K.. 2010;Expert to novice: Experiences of professional adaptation reported by non-English speaking nurses in Australia. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 27(3):31-37.
  • Goldber D. P.. 1972. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Gonzalez H. M., Haan M. N., Hinton L.. 2001;Acculturation and the prevalence of depression in older Mexican Americans: Baseline results of the Sacramento area Latino study on aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 49(7):948-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49186.x.
  • Health Resources and Services Administration. (HRSA.2010;The registered nurse population: Findings from the 2008 national sample survey of registered nurses Retrieved February 15, 2012, from.http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/rnsurvey2008.html.
  • Hong K., Yoon S., Kang C.. 2004;The study on Korean nurses' international employment and work performance. The Korean Nurse. 231:62-82.
  • Ivković M.. 2011;International nurse migrations-global trends. Journal of the Geographic Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA. 61(12):53-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1102053I.
  • Kang C. H.. 2012;Structured equation modeling on nursing competence of Korean registered nurses in the United States Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul..
  • Kawachi I., Berkman L. F.. 2001;Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health. 78:458-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.
  • Kim J. H.. 2000;Model construction of occupational stress in manufacturing workers Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul..
  • Kingma M.. 2008;Nurses on the move: Diversity and the work environment. Contemporary Nurse. 28(1-2):198-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.28.1-2.198.
  • Knipscheer J. W., Kleber R. J.. 2007;Acculturation and mental health among Ghanaians in the Netherlands. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 53(4):369-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020764007078344.
  • Learthart S.. 2000;Health effects of internal rotation of shifts. Nursing Standard. 14(47):34-36.
  • Lee E., Son J. T.. 2010;Factors influencing intention of migration by hospital nurses in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 16(4):437-445.
  • Lee S.. 2006;Cultural hybrid in the process of globalization and migration: A comparative analysis of the cases of Korean migrant women in Germany and foreign migrant women in Korea. Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Sozialwissenschaften. 16(2):191-228.
  • Nicholas B. L., Davis C. R., Richardson D. R.. 2010;An integrative review of global nursing workforce issues. Annual Review of Nursing Research. 28:113-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.28.113.
  • Noh H. N.. 2007;A study on acculturative stress of the Chinese women who got married to Korean men and settled down in Korea-Focusing on the acculturation patterns and social support perceived by women- Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul..
  • Oh J. Y.. 2009;Korean mothers' passion to "go out to the U.S." as a registered nurse. Weekly Donga. 682:56-57.
  • Shin S. I.. 2001;The validity and reliability of the Korean Version of the General Health Questionnaire: KGHQ-20 & KGHQ-30. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 46:210-230.
  • Statistics Calculators. 2013;Sobel test calculator for the significance of mediation Retrieved April 20, 2013, from.http://danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=31.
  • Thompson S., Hartel G., Manderson L., Woelz-Stirling N., Kelaher M.. 2002;The mental health status of Filipinas in Queensland. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 36:674-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01070.x.
  • Yi M. S.. 1996;Overcoming language barrier by Korean nurses in U. S. hospital settings. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 26(2):483-495.
  • Yi M. S.. 1998;A comparison of hospital nursing practice in Korea and the U.S. as experienced by Korean nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 28(1):60-69.
  • Yi M., Jezewski M. A.. 2000;Korean nurses' adjustment to hospitals in the United States of America. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 32(3):721-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01533.x.
  • Weinert C.. 1988. Measuring social support: Revision and further development of personal resource questionnaire. In: Waltz C. F., Strickland O. L., editors. Measuring of nursing outcomes. p. 309-327. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Zhou Y., Windsor C., Coyer F., Theobald K.. 2010;Ambivalence and the experience of China-educated nurses working in Australia. Nursing Inquiry. 17(3):186-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00492.x.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      The Impact of Acculturation and Social Support on Mental Health among Korean-American Registered Nurses
      Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(2):157-169.   Published online April 30, 2013
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      The Impact of Acculturation and Social Support on Mental Health among Korean-American Registered Nurses
      Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(2):157-169.   Published online April 30, 2013
      Close

      Figure

      • 0
      The Impact of Acculturation and Social Support on Mental Health among Korean-American Registered Nurses
      Image
      Figure 1. The mediation effect on the relationship between acculturation and mental health.
      The Impact of Acculturation and Social Support on Mental Health among Korean-American Registered Nurses

      The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (N=203)

      Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD Assimilation Separation Integration Margination Social support Mental health
      M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t t or F p M±SD t or F p
      Age (year) <35 52 (25.6) 2.4±0.4 1.87 .136 2.9±0.4 0.26 . .851 3.1±0.5 2.15 .096 2.1±0.5 0.94 .421 3.4±0.3 2.38 .071 2.0±0.3 0.38 .770
      35~44 59 (29.1) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
      45~54 58 (28.6) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
      ≥55 34 (16.8) 2.5±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.4±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.5±0.4 2.1±0.3
        43.2±10.1            
      Gender Male 4 (2.0) 2.3±0.5 -0.13 .897 3.0±0.5 0.16 .874 3.2±0.6 -0.78 .435 2.2±0.5 1.08 .280 3.4±0.4 0.37 .713 2.0±0.3 0.89 .373
      Female 199 (98.0) 2.4±0.4     2.9±0.4     3.4±0.6     1.9±0.2     3.3±0.4     1.9±0.4    
      Marital status Singlea 73 (36.0) 2.3±0.5 4.37 .014 3.0±0.4 0.20 . .822 3.1±0.5 0.88 .417 2.3±0.5 2.02 .136 3.3±0.4 0.85 .430 2.1±0.3 1.03 .360
      Marriedb 120 (59.1) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.6 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
      Othersc 10 (4.9) 2.1±0.4 2.9±0.6 3.1±0.8 2.4±0.6 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
      Religion Protestant 120 (59.1) 2.3±0.5 0.42 .741 3.0±0.4 2.67 . .049 3.1±0.6 1.05 .373 2.2±0.5 0.64 .589 3.4±0.4 1.68 .173 2.0±0.3 0.99 .400
      Catholic 41 (20.2) 2.4±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.3±0.5 2.3±0.6 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
      Buddhism 16 (7.9) 2.4±0.6 2.9±0.4 3.3±0.5 2.2±0.4 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.2
      None 26 (12.8) 2.4±0.4 2.8±0.4 3.1±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.2±0.4 2.1±0.4
      Educational background 3-year collegea 97 (47.8) 2.4±0.5 0.33 .806 2.9±0.5 0.43 . .735 3.2±0.6 1.99 .116 2.2±0.5 2.93 .035 3.4±0.4 0.87 .456 2.0±0.3 2.70 .047
      Bachelor degreeb 67 (33.0) 2.3±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.1±0.5 2.3±0.4 c>d 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3 b, c>d
      ≥Master degreec 24 (11.8) 2.4±0.6 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.4±0.6 3.5±0.4 2.1±0.3
      NHSd 15 (7.4) 2.3±0.4 2.9±0.5 3.5±0.8 2.0±0.6 3.5±0.4 1.8±0.4
      Nursing experience in Korea (year) <3a 54 (26.6) 2.4±0.4 0.33 .800 2.9±0.4 0.83 . .481 3.3±0.7 1.48 .220 2.1±0.5 4.20 .007 3.4±0.4 3.11 .028 2.0±0.3 1.31 .273
      3~<6b 57 (28.1) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.5 2.2±0.5 d>a 3.5±0.3 2.0±0.3
      6~<9c 45 (22.2) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
      ≥9d 47 (23.2) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.4±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
        6.0±5.1            

      NHS=nursing high school.

      The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (Continued) (N=203)

      Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD Assimilation Separation Integration Margination Social support Mental health
      M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p M±SD t or F p
      Nursing experience in the U.S (year) <1a 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.3 7.01 <.001 2.8±0.5 1.89 .132 2.9±0.5 8.52 <.001 2.1±0.5 1.48 .221 3.4±0.4 0.54 .654 1.9±0.3 0.66 .576
      1~<5b 73 (36.0) 2.3±0.5 d>c 2.9±0.4 3.1±0.5 d>a, b, c 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
      5~<10c 64 (31.5) 2.2±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.1±0.5 2.2±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.0±0.3
      ≥10d 52 (25.6) 2.5±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.5±0.5 2.1±0.4 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
        8.3±8.5            
      Current position GRSa 183 (90.2) 2.3±0.5 0.50 .606 3.0±0.4 0.61 . .545 3.1±0.6 8.64 <.001 2.3±0.5 6.00 .003 3.4±0.4 3.77 .025 2.1±0.3 2.86 .060
      Nurse managerb 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.4 2.8±0.5 3.7±0.4 b>a 1.8±0.4 3.6±0.4 1.9±0.4
      Nurse practitionerc 6 (3.0) 2.5±0.3 3.0±0.4 3.6±0.5 1.9±0.4 3.6±0.3 1.8±0.2
      Work shift Per daya 137 (67.5) 2.4±0.5 1.39 .247 3.0±0.5 1.66 . .176 3.2±0.5 3.98 <.001 2.2±0.5 2.37 .072 3.4±0.4 1.41 .240 2.0±0.3 2.97 .033
      Per eveningb 12 (5.9) 2.6±0.5 2.7±0.4 3.4±0.5 2.3±0.6 3.4±0.5 2.1±0.4 d>a, b, c
      Per nightc 40 (19.7) 2.3±0.4 3.0±0.5 3.0±0.6 2.3±0.6 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.4
      Rotating/Per diemd 14 (6.9) 2.4±0.6 3.1±0.3 2.9±0.7 2.4±0.5 3.2±0.4 2.3±0.2
      Working hours (per week) <30 34 (16.8) 2.3±0.5 0.90 .410 2.9±0.4 0.23 .791 3.1±0.5 1.34 .264 2.3±0.5 1.97 .142 3.3±0.4 0.32 .730 2.1±0.3 0.61 .543
      30~40 101 (49.8) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.1±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
      >40 68 (33.5) 2.4±0.4 3.0±0.4 3.2±0.5 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
      Annual income (US dollar) <50,000a 46 (22.7) 12.4±0.4 0.88 .455 3.0±0.4 0.36 .780 3.0±0.5 6.10 <.001 2.2±0.5 2.49 .061 3.4±0.4 2.07 .105 2.0±0.4 0.61 .610
      50,000~<75,000b 50 (24.6) 2.3±0.5 2.9±0.5 3.0±0.5 d>a, b 2.3±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.1±0.3
      75,000~<90,000c 51 (25.1) 2.3±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.2±0.6 2.3±0.5 3.3±0.4 2.1±0.3
      ≥90,0000d 56 (27.6) 2.4±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.4±0.6 2.1±0.5 3.5±0.4 2.0±0.3
      Current visa Citizena 69 (34.0) 2.4±0.5 3.44 .018 3.0±0.5 1.44 . .231 3.4±0.5 5.75 <.001 2.1±0.5 5.43 .001 3.5±0.4 4.73 .003 2.0±0.3 0.64 .589
      Permanent residentb 69 (34.0) 2.3±0.5 a>d 3.0±0.4 3.1±0.6 a>d 2.3±0.5 d>c, a 3.3±0.4 a>d 2.1±0.3
      Student/CPTc 55 (27.1) 2.4±0.3 2.9±0.4 3.1±0.4 2.2±0.5 3.4±0.4 2.0±0.3
      OPTd 10 (4.9) 2.0±0.4 3.0±0.6 2.9±0.6 2.6±0.6 3.1±0.4 2.1±0.3

      GRS=general registered nurse; CPT=curricular practical training; OPT=optional practical training.

      Levels of Acculturation, Social Support, and Menta Health (N=203

      Variables n (%) or M±SD Items
      Acculturation    
        Assimilation 2.3±0.5 8
        Separation 3.0±0.5 7
        Integration 3.2±0.6 5
        Marginalization 2.2±0.6 9
      Social support 3.4±0.4 21
      Mental health 2.0±0.3 20
        ≥13 4 (2.0)  
        <13 199 (98.0)  

      Correlations among Acculturation, Social Support, Mental Health (N=203)

      Variables Categories Mental health Assimilation Separation Integration Marginalization
      r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
      Acculturation Assimilation -.10 (.160) 1      
      Separation .10 (.136) -.30 (<.001) 1    
      Integration -.30 (<.001) .51 (<.001) -.24 (.001) 1  
      Marginalization .56 (<.001) -.10 (.153) .21 (.003) -0.36 (<.001) 1
      Social support   -.52 (<.001) .22 (.001) -.12 (.078) 0.26 (<.001) -0.43 (<.001)

      Levels of Health Perception and Related Variables (N=203)

      Model Categories B SE β t p Collinearity statistics
      Tolerance VIF Adj. R2 F (p)
      Model 1   (Constant) 40.21 0.68 .05 59.15 <.001     .06 3.04 (.007)
        Bachelor degree 0.61 1.00 .04 0.61 .543 .85 1.18
        Master degree 0.69 1.41 -.19 0.49 .624 .91 1.10
        Nursing high school -4.58 1.74 .08 -2.63 .009 .90 1.11
        Evening shift 2.25 1.91 .05 1.18 .241 .92 1.09
        Night shift 0.82 1.11 .21 0.74 .463 .95 1.05
        Rotating/per diem 5.18 1.73   3.00 .003 .97 1.03
      Model 2   (Constant) 30.36 3.37 .00 9.00 <.001     .32 16.65 (<.001)
        Bachelor degree 0.11 0.85 .01 0.14 .892 .84 1.18
        Master degree -0.86 1.21 -.04 -0.71 .476 .88 1.14
        Nursing high school -2.51 1.49 -.10 -1.68 .095 .88 1.14
        Evening shift 1.38 1.63 .05 0.85 .399 .91 1.10
        Night shift -0.55 0.96 -.03 -0.57 .567 .91 1.09
        Rotating/per diem 3.06 1.49 .12 2.05 .041 .94 1.06
        Integration -0.21 0.14 -.10 -1.49 .138 .82 1.22
        Marginalization 0.70 0.09 .50 7.78 <.001 .81 1.23
      Model 3   (Constant) 51.26 4.96 .00 10.33 <.001     .41 16.65 (<.001)
        Bachelor degree 0.16 0.79 .01 0.20 .843 .84 1.18
        Master degree 0.10 1.14 .01 0.09 .929 .86 1.17
        Nursing high school -2.65 1.39 -.11 -1.90 .059 .88 1.14
        Evening shift 1.49 1.52 .06 0.98 .328 .91 1.10
        Night shift -0.67 0.90 -.04 -0.75 .457 .91 1.09
        Rotating/Per diem 2.72 1.39 .11 1.96 .052 .94 1.07
        Integration -0.14 0.13 -.06 -1.06 .290 .81 1.23
        Marginalization 0.51 0.09 .36 5.57 <.001 .69 1.45
        Social support -0.26 0.05 -.33 -5.45 <.001 .78 1.28
      Table 1. The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (N=203)

      NHS=nursing high school.

      Table 1. The Characteristics of Participants and Differences of Accumulation, Social Support, and Mental Health according to Sample Characteries (Continued) (N=203)

      GRS=general registered nurse; CPT=curricular practical training; OPT=optional practical training.

      Table 2. Levels of Acculturation, Social Support, and Menta Health (N=203

      Table 3. Correlations among Acculturation, Social Support, Mental Health (N=203)

      Table 4. Levels of Health Perception and Related Variables (N=203)

      TOP