• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

Korean J Adult Nurs : Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button
Search
Advanced Search
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Research

Nutritional Intake and Timing of Initial Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Patients: A Pilot Study

Hyunjung Kim
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2013;25(4):444-453.
Published online: August 18, 2013

Division of Nursing ‧ Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea

Corresponding author: Kim, Hyunjung Division of Nursing, Hallym University, 1 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon, 200-702, Korea. Tel: +82-33-248-2712, Fax: +82-33-248-2734, E-mail: hjkim97@hallym.ac.kr
• Received: March 6, 2013   • Accepted: August 13, 2013

© 2013 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 240 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next

Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to describe the differences between early and delayed enteral nutrition on nutritional intake.
  • Methods
    A pilot cohort study was conducted with 45 critically ill adult patients who had a primary medical diagnosis. Energy prescribed and received were collected during the four days after initiation of enteral nutrition. Adequate feeding was defined as the energy intake more than 90% of required energy.
  • Results
    A total of 23 patients (52%) were received early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours of admission). Energy intake of early enteral nutrition was less than intake of delayed enteral nutrition during the four days of the study. Although the difference on day one was significantly greater than the differences on day two, the differences on day two were not different from days three or four. No statistical differences in the adequacy of nutritional intake were found between patients in the early and the delayed group.
  • Conclusion
    In critically ill patients receiving early enteral nutrition, more aggressive administration from the beginning will improve the nutritional intake. Additional studies including a large multi-centre, randomized clinical trial are recommended.
  • Key Words: Early enteral nutrition; Intensive care units; Nutritional intake
Figure 1.
Trend in daily energy intake of early and delayed enteral nutrition
kjan-25-444f1.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of Participants (N=45)
Characteristics Categories Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age(year)   71.7±13.8 66.1±15.0 1.29 .203
≤54 2 (8.7) 5 (22.7) 2.74 .601
55~64 4 (17.4) 3 (13.6)
65~74 5 (21.7) 6 (27.3)
75~84 9 (39.1) 7 (31.8)
≥85 3 (13.1) 1 (4.6)
Gender Male 9 (39.1) 13 (59.1) -0.20 .189
Female 14 (60.9) 9 (40.9)
Diagnosis Gastrointestinal 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) -0.21 .158
Neurological 13 (56.5) 9 (40.9)
Sepsis 1 (4.3) 2 (9.1)
Renal 3 (13.1) 3 (13.6)
Respiratory 6 (26.1) 6 (27.3)
APACHE II score   11.2±5.6 15.6±6.0 -2.50 .016
Serum albumin (mg)   3.4±0.8 3.2±0.6 -0.16 .875
Serum CRP (mg)   3.7±5.0 7.1±7.2 -1.78 .082
BMI Underweight (＜18.5) 2 (8.7) 2 (9.1) -0.04 .804
Healthy weight (18.5~22.9) 8 (34.8) 8 (36.4)
Over weight (23~24.9) 8 (34.8) 6 (27.3)
Mild obese (25~25.9) 5 (21.7) 6 (27.3)
Feeding tube location Nasogastric tube 23 (100.0) 22 (100.0) - -
Feeding tube size 16 Fr 12 (52.2) 12 (54.5) -0.02 .877
18 Fr 11 (47.8) 10 (45.5)
Feeding formula Isocaloric 20 (87.0) 15 (68.2) 2.29 .130
Calorically dense 3 (13.0) 7 (31.8)
Prokinetics No 20 (87.0) 17 (77.3) 0.55 .458
Yes 3 (13.0) 5 (22.7)
Gastric residual Low(＜50) 17 (73.9) 14 (63.6) 0.75 .477
High(≥50ml) 6 (26.1) 8 (36.4)
Diarrhea No 18 (78.2) 12 (54.5) 3.52 .061
Yes 5 (21.8) 10 (45.5)
Vomiting No 22 (95.6) 20 (90.9) 1.89 .169
Yes 1 (4.4) 2 (9.1)

APACHE II=acute physiology chronic health evaluation II; CRP=C-reactive protein; BMI=body mass index.

Table 2.
Interaction between Energy received in the Early and Delayed Nutrition Group and Time (N=45)
Variables Categories Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) Between group Within group
Group Time Time×Group
M±SD (kcal) M±SD (kcal) F (p)† F (p)† F (p)†
Energy received (total) Day1 714±236 1,203±422 13.89 (.001) 0.90 (.455) 5.59 (.004)
Day2 921±282 1,122±402
Day3 1,132±189 1,136±243
Day4 1,075±263 1,160±242
Mean 958±161 1,165±189
Energy received (enteral) Day1 548±124 893±201 4.54 (.041) 1.71 (.187) 2.60 (.057)
Day2 854±234 1,003±259
Day3 1,103±177 1,071±236
Day4 1,075±263 1,116±237
Mean 892±160 1,012±178
Energy required   1,228±230 1,377±317

†Controlling for APACHE II scores.

Table 3.
Comparison of Under- and Adequate Feeding in the Early and Delayed Enteral Nutrition Group (N=45)
Variables Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) x2† p
n (%) n (%)
Underfeeding 17 (73.9) 11 (50.0) 2.76 .089
Adequate feeding 6 (26.1) 11 (50.0)    

†Controlling for APACHE II scores.

  • American Dietetic Association. 2000. Manual of clinical dietetics. 6th ed.. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association.
  • Alexander E., Susla G. M., Burstein A. H., Brown D. T., Ognibene F. P.. 2004;Retrospective evaluation of commonly used equations to predict energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy. 24(12):1659-1667.
  • Amato P., Keating K. P., Quercia R. A., Karbonic J.. 1995;Formulaic methods of estimating caloric requirements in mechanical ventilated obese patients: A reappraisal. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 10:229-232.
  • Artinian V., Krayem H., DiGiovine B.. 2006;Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest. 129(4):960-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.4.960.
  • Binnekade J. M., Tepaske R., Bruynzeel P., Mathus-Vliegen E. M. H., de Haan R. J.. 2005;Daily enteral feeding practice on the ICU: Attainment of goals and interfering factors. Critical Care. 9:R218-R225.
  • Cartwright M. M.. 2004;The metabolic response to stress: A case of complex nutrition support management. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 16:467-487.
  • Desachy A., Clavel M., Vuagnat A., Normand S., Gissort V., Francois B.. 2008;Initial efficacy and tolerability of early enteral nutrition with immediate or gradual introduction in intubated patients. Intensive Care Medicine. 34(6):1054-1059.
  • Doig G. S., Heighes P. T., Simpson F., Sweetman E. A., Davies A. R.. 2009;Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Medicine. 35:2018-2027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1664-4.
  • Dvir D., Cohen J., Singer P.. 2006;Computerized energy balance and complications in critically ill patients: An observational study. Clinical Nutrition. 25(1):37-44.
  • Elpern E. H., Stutz L., Peterson S., Gurka D. P., Skipper A.. 2004;Outcomes associated with enteral tube feedings in a medical intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care. 13(3):221-227.
  • Hise M. E., Halterman K., Gajewski B. J., Parkhurst M., Moncure M., Brown J. C.. 2007;Feeding practices of severely ill intensive care unit patients: An evaluation of energy sources and clinical outcomes. Journal of American Dietetic Association. 107(3):458-465.
  • Hsu C. W., Sun S. F., Lin S. L., Kang S. P., Chu K. A., Lin C. H., et al. 2009;Duodenal versus gastric feeding in medical intensive care unit patients: A prospective, randomized, clinical study. Critical Care Medicine. 37(6):1866-1872.
  • Huang H. H., Hsu C. W., Kang S. P., Liu M. Y., Chang S. J.. 2012;Association between illness severity and timing of initial enteral feeding in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study. Nutrition Journal. 11(30):1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-11-30.
  • Ibrahim E. H., Mehringer L., Prentice D., Sherman G., Schaiff R., Fraser V., et al. 2002;Early versus late enteral feeding of mechanically ventilated patients: Results of a clinical trial. JPEN Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 26(3):174-181.
  • Isabel M., Correia T. D., Waitzberg D. L.. 2003;The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 22(3):235-239.
  • Kim H., Choi-Kwon S.. 2011;Changes in nutritional status in ICU patients receiving enteral tube feeding: A prospective descriptive study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 27:194-201.
  • Kim H., Choi S. H., Ham Y. J.. 2009;Nutritional status and indicators of intensive care unit patients on enteral feeding. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental Nursing. 16(1):21-29.
  • Kim H., Shin J. A., Shin J. Y., Cho O. M.. 2010;Adequacy of nutritional support and reasons for underfeeding in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients. Asian Nursing Research. 4(2):102-110.
  • Marik P. E., Zaloga G. P.. 2001;Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine. 29:2264-2270.
  • Martin C. M., Doig G. S., Heyland D. K., Morrison T., Sibbald W. J.. 2004;Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). Canadian Medical Association Journal. 170(2):197-204.
  • McClave S. A., Martindale R. G., Vanek V. W., McCarthy M., Roberts P., Taylor B., et al. 2009;Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care (SCCM) and American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N). JPEN Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 33:277-316.
  • McClave S. A., Spain D. A., Lukan J. K., Lowen C. C., Dryden G. W.. 2004;Can enteral nutrition provide adequate stress prophylaxis for patients on mechanical ventilation? Gastroenterology. 126(4):A647.
  • Mowe M., Bosaeus I., Rasmussen H. H., Kondrup J., Unosson M., Irtun O.. 2006;Nutritional routines and attitudes among doctors and nurses in Scandinavia: A questionnaire based survey. Clinical Nutrition. 25(3):524-532.
  • Reignier J., Thenoz-Jost N., Fiancette M., Legendre E., Lebert C., Bontemps F., et al. 2004;Early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients in the prone position. Critical Care Medicine. 32(1):94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000104208.23542.A8.
  • Rodriguez L.. 2004;Nutritional status: Assessing and understanding its value in the critical care setting. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 15(4):509-514.
  • Singer P., Berger M. M., Van den Berghe G., Biolo G., Calder P., Forbes A., et al. 2009;ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: Intensive care. Clinical Nutrition. 28:387-400.
  • Sungurtekin K., Sungurtekin U., Oner O., Okke D.. 2008;Nutrition assessment in critically ill patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 23(6):635-641.
  • Terekeci H., Kucukardali Y., Top C., Onem Y., Celik S., Oktenli C.. 2009;Risk assessment study of the pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 20:394-397.
  • Villet S., Chiolero R. L., Bollmann M. D., Revelly J. P., Cayeux R. N. M., Delarue J., et al. 2005;Negative impact of hypo-caloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients. Clinical Nutrition. 24(4):502-509.
  • Woo S. H., Finch C. K., Broyles J. E., Wan J., Boswell R., Hurdle A.. 2010;Early vs delayed enteral nutrition in critically ill medical patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 25(2):205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0884533610361605.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • A Case Report about Diarrhea of Soeumin Caused by Tube Feeding Treated with Korean Medicinal Treatment
      Jeong-been Ha, Su-jung Lee, Jae-hwan Lew
      The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine.2020; 41(2): 150.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Nutritional Intake and Timing of Initial Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Patients: A Pilot Study
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(4):444-453.   Published online August 31, 2013
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.4.444
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Nutritional Intake and Timing of Initial Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Patients: A Pilot Study
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(4):444-453.   Published online August 31, 2013
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.4.444
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    Nutritional Intake and Timing of Initial Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Patients: A Pilot Study
    Image
    Figure 1. Trend in daily energy intake of early and delayed enteral nutrition

    Figure 1.

    Nutritional Intake and Timing of Initial Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Patients: A Pilot Study

    Characteristics of Participants (N=45)

    Characteristics Categories Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) x2 or t p
    n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
    Age(year)   71.7±13.8 66.1±15.0 1.29 .203
    ≤54 2 (8.7) 5 (22.7) 2.74 .601
    55~64 4 (17.4) 3 (13.6)
    65~74 5 (21.7) 6 (27.3)
    75~84 9 (39.1) 7 (31.8)
    ≥85 3 (13.1) 1 (4.6)
    Gender Male 9 (39.1) 13 (59.1) -0.20 .189
    Female 14 (60.9) 9 (40.9)
    Diagnosis Gastrointestinal 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) -0.21 .158
    Neurological 13 (56.5) 9 (40.9)
    Sepsis 1 (4.3) 2 (9.1)
    Renal 3 (13.1) 3 (13.6)
    Respiratory 6 (26.1) 6 (27.3)
    APACHE II score   11.2±5.6 15.6±6.0 -2.50 .016
    Serum albumin (mg)   3.4±0.8 3.2±0.6 -0.16 .875
    Serum CRP (mg)   3.7±5.0 7.1±7.2 -1.78 .082
    BMI Underweight (＜18.5) 2 (8.7) 2 (9.1) -0.04 .804
    Healthy weight (18.5~22.9) 8 (34.8) 8 (36.4)
    Over weight (23~24.9) 8 (34.8) 6 (27.3)
    Mild obese (25~25.9) 5 (21.7) 6 (27.3)
    Feeding tube location Nasogastric tube 23 (100.0) 22 (100.0) - -
    Feeding tube size 16 Fr 12 (52.2) 12 (54.5) -0.02 .877
    18 Fr 11 (47.8) 10 (45.5)
    Feeding formula Isocaloric 20 (87.0) 15 (68.2) 2.29 .130
    Calorically dense 3 (13.0) 7 (31.8)
    Prokinetics No 20 (87.0) 17 (77.3) 0.55 .458
    Yes 3 (13.0) 5 (22.7)
    Gastric residual Low(＜50) 17 (73.9) 14 (63.6) 0.75 .477
    High(≥50ml) 6 (26.1) 8 (36.4)
    Diarrhea No 18 (78.2) 12 (54.5) 3.52 .061
    Yes 5 (21.8) 10 (45.5)
    Vomiting No 22 (95.6) 20 (90.9) 1.89 .169
    Yes 1 (4.4) 2 (9.1)

    APACHE II=acute physiology chronic health evaluation II; CRP=C-reactive protein; BMI=body mass index.

    Interaction between Energy received in the Early and Delayed Nutrition Group and Time (N=45)

    Variables Categories Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) Between group Within group
    Group Time Time×Group
    M±SD (kcal) M±SD (kcal) F (p)† F (p)† F (p)†
    Energy received (total) Day1 714±236 1,203±422 13.89 (.001) 0.90 (.455) 5.59 (.004)
    Day2 921±282 1,122±402
    Day3 1,132±189 1,136±243
    Day4 1,075±263 1,160±242
    Mean 958±161 1,165±189
    Energy received (enteral) Day1 548±124 893±201 4.54 (.041) 1.71 (.187) 2.60 (.057)
    Day2 854±234 1,003±259
    Day3 1,103±177 1,071±236
    Day4 1,075±263 1,116±237
    Mean 892±160 1,012±178
    Energy required   1,228±230 1,377±317

    †Controlling for APACHE II scores.

    Comparison of Under- and Adequate Feeding in the Early and Delayed Enteral Nutrition Group (N=45)

    Variables Early nutrition (n=23) Delayed nutrition (n=22) x2† p
    n (%) n (%)
    Underfeeding 17 (73.9) 11 (50.0) 2.76 .089
    Adequate feeding 6 (26.1) 11 (50.0)    

    †Controlling for APACHE II scores.
    Table 1. Characteristics of Participants (N=45)

    APACHE II=acute physiology chronic health evaluation II; CRP=C-reactive protein; BMI=body mass index.

    Table 2. Interaction between Energy received in the Early and Delayed Nutrition Group and Time (N=45)

    Controlling for APACHE II scores.

    Table 3. Comparison of Under- and Adequate Feeding in the Early and Delayed Enteral Nutrition Group (N=45)

    Controlling for APACHE II scores.

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Korean J Adult Nurs : Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

    ABOUT

    BROWSE ARTICLES 

    EDITORIAL POLICY

    FOR CONTRIBUTORS  

    © Korean Society of Adult Nursing.
    TOP