• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Comparison of Delirium Screening Instruments for the Elderly

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2013;25(6):655-664.
Published online: December 31, 2013

1Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.

2College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

3Department of Nursing, Jesus University, Jeonju, Korea.

4College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

5Division of Nursing, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

6Department of Nursing, Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea.

7College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

8Department of Nursing, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Korea.

9Red Cross of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Chang, Sung Ok. College of Nursing, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, Korea. Tel: +82-10-8917-4918, Fax: +82-2-927-4676, sungok@korea.ac.kr
• Received: June 12, 2013   • Revised: December 6, 2013   • Accepted: December 18, 2013

© 2013 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

  • 31 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study was undertaken to identify which delirium screening instrument would be more useful in clinical practice.
  • Methods
    Data were collected from 118 nurses from six hospitals in five provinces in Korea. For the delirium screening three instruments were compared: NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). The MMSE-K was used for concurrent validity. The nurse subjects were surveyed as to the practical clinical value of each instrument. Cronbach's α coefficient and Kuder-Richardson 20 were used to confirm the reliability.
  • Results
    The range of three scales reliability was .70~.82 and the range of correlation coefficient was .63~.82 with MMSE-K. For sensitivity of NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 1.00, 1.00 and 0.81 respectively and specificity NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS was 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier to use than the NEECHAM and Nu-DESC.
  • Conclusion
    NEECHAM, Nu-DESC and DOS scales were acceptable in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity. However, nurses rated the DOS scale as easier scale to use and had more relevance to their practice.

This work was supported by the Interest Group research grant of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing Lambda Alpha Chapter-at-Large

  • 1. Adamis D, Sharma N, Whelan PJ, Macdonald AJ. Delirium scales: A review of current evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2010;14:543-555.
  • 2. Champagne MT, Neelon VJ, McConnel ES, Funk S. The NEECHAM Confusion Scale: Assessing acute confusion in hospitalized and nursing home elderly. Gerontologist. 1987;27:Supplement 4A.
  • 3. Duppils GS. Predictive value and validation of the NEECHAM confusion scale using DSM-IV criteria for delirium as gold standard. Int J Older People Nurs. 2011;6(2):133-142.
  • 4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patient for the clinician. J Psychiatry Res. 1975;12:189-198.
  • 5. Foreman MD, Zane D. Nursing strategies for acute confusion in elders. Am J Nurs. 1996;96(4):44-52.
  • 6. Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, Tremblay A, Roy MA. Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: The nursing delirium screening scale. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;29(4):368-375.
  • 7. Gemert van L, Schuurmans MJ. The Neecham confusion scale and the delirium observation screening scale: Capacity to discriminate and ease of use in clinical practice. BMC Nurs. 2007;6(3):1-6.
  • 8. Grover S, Kate N. Assessment scales for delirium: A review. World J Psychiatry. 2012;2(4):58-70.
  • 9. Han MI. Clinical approach to delirium in elderly patients. J Korean Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;8:96-101.
  • 10. Inouye SK. The confusion assessment method (CAM): Training manual and coding guide. New Haven: Yale University School of Medicine; 2003.
  • 11. Inouye SK, Foreman MD, Mion LC, Katz KH, Cooney LM. Nurses' recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2467-3473.
  • 12. Kim EJ, Park YK. SPSS statistical analysis 8. Seoul: 21Saegi Co; 2000.
  • 13. Kim KN, Kim CH, Kim KI, Yoo HJ, Park SY, Park YH. Development and validation of the Korean nursing delirium scale. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012;42:414-423.
  • 14. Kwon YC, Park JH. Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) part I: Development of the test for the elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989;28:125-135.
  • 15. Lee EH, Jung YH, Kim JS, Song RY, Hwang KY. Statistical methods for health care research. Seoul: Kunja Publishing; 2002.
  • 16. Lee YW, Kim CG, Kong ES, Kim KB, Kim NC, Kim HK, et al. A study of nurses' knowledge level and assessment experience of delirium. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2007;19:35-44.
  • 17. Matarese M, Generoso S, Ivziku D, Pedone C, Marinis MG. Delirium in older patients: A diagnostic study of Neecham confusion scale in surgical intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2012;11 22 26:1-9. on-line published
  • 18. McCarthy M. Detecting acute confusion in older adults: Comparing clinical reasoning of nurses working in acute, long-term, and community health care environments. Res Nurs Health. 2003;26:203-212.
  • 19. Neelon VJ, Champagne MT, Carlson JR, Funk SG. The NEECHAM Confusion Scale: Construction, validation, and clinical testing. Nurs Res. 1996;45:324-330.
  • 20. Park JH, Kwon YC. Standardization of Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part II. Diagnostic validity. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989;28:508-513.
  • 21. Polit D, Beck C, Hungler B. Essential of nursing research: methods, appraisal and utilization. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001.
  • 22. Rapp CG, Wakerfield B, Kundarat M, Mentes JC, Tripp-Reimer T, Culp K, et al. Acute confusion assessment instruments: Clinical versus research utility. Appl Nurs Res. 2000;13:37-45.
  • 23. Rompaey BV, Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Truijen S, Elseviers M, Bossaert L. A comparison of the CAM-ICU and the NEECHAM confusion scale in intensive care delirium assessement: An observational study in non-intubated patients. Crit Care. 2008;12:1-7.
  • 24. Shuurmans MJ, Donders RT, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Duursma SA. Delirium case finding: Pilot testing of a new screening scale for nurses. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2002;50(4):S3.
  • 25. Shuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Duursma SA. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: A screening instrument for delirium. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003;17(1):31-50.
  • 26. Trzepacz PT, Meagher DJ, Wise MG. Neuropsychiatric aspects of delirium. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, editors. Textbook of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc; 2002. p. 534-564.
  • 27. Wakerfield BJ. Risk for acute confusion on hospital admission. Clin Nurs Res. 2002;11:153-172.
  • 28. Yu MY, Park JW, Hyun MS, Lee YJ. Factors related to delirium occurrence among the patients in the intensive care units. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2008;14:151-160.
Table 1

General Characteristics of Subjects (N=118)

kjan-25-655-i001.jpg
Table 2

Correlation among NEECHAM Confusion Scale, Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, Delirium Observation Scale and MMSE-K (N=118)

kjan-25-655-i002.jpg

MMSE-K=Mini-mental state examination-Korean

Table 3

The Difference of Easiness of Use in Clinical Practice among Each Scale for Delirium Assessment (N=118)

kjan-25-655-i003.jpg

NEECHAM=NEECHAM confusion scale; Nu-DSC=nursing delirium screening scale; DOS=delirium observation scale.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Evaluation of Clinical Usefulness of Delirium Assessment Tools for Elderly Patients after Neurosurgery
      Su-Jung Kim, Jun-Ah Song
      Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2015; 17(1): 38.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Comparison of Delirium Screening Instruments for the Elderly
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(6):655-664.   Published online December 31, 2013
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Comparison of Delirium Screening Instruments for the Elderly
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(6):655-664.   Published online December 31, 2013
    Close
    Comparison of Delirium Screening Instruments for the Elderly
    Comparison of Delirium Screening Instruments for the Elderly

    General Characteristics of Subjects (N=118)

    Correlation among NEECHAM Confusion Scale, Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, Delirium Observation Scale and MMSE-K (N=118)

    MMSE-K=Mini-mental state examination-Korean

    The Difference of Easiness of Use in Clinical Practice among Each Scale for Delirium Assessment (N=118)

    NEECHAM=NEECHAM confusion scale; Nu-DSC=nursing delirium screening scale; DOS=delirium observation scale.

    Table 1 General Characteristics of Subjects (N=118)

    Table 2 Correlation among NEECHAM Confusion Scale, Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, Delirium Observation Scale and MMSE-K (N=118)

    MMSE-K=Mini-mental state examination-Korean

    Table 3 The Difference of Easiness of Use in Clinical Practice among Each Scale for Delirium Assessment (N=118)

    NEECHAM=NEECHAM confusion scale; Nu-DSC=nursing delirium screening scale; DOS=delirium observation scale.

    TOP