• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Development and Effect of Sex Education Program for the Elderly

Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2014;26(3):266-274.
Published online: June 30, 2014

1Division of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul

2Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Park, Hyojung Division of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3277-2824, Fax: +82-2-3277-2850, E-mail: hyojungp@ewha.ac.kr
• Received: December 26, 2013   • Accepted: May 30, 2014

Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 31 Views
  • 2 Download
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of sex education for the elderly on sexual knowledge and life satisfaction.
  • Methods
    A quasi-experimental study used a non-equivalent control group pre-post test design. A seven week sex education program for the elderly was developed and offered to the treatment group. Subjects were drawn from three welfare centers in Seoul. Twenty six were selected for the treatment l group while 27 were assigned to a comparison group. Sexual knowledge and life satisfaction were measured.
  • Results
    The level of life satisfaction reported by the treatment group was greatly increased (t=2.14, p=.037). There were no statistically significant differences in sexual knowledge between both the two groups.
  • Conclusion
    A positive influence of sex education was found to increase the level of life satisfaction. Further study on customized sex education for the elderly by individual characteristics is required.
Table 1.
Organization of Sex Education Program for the Elderly
Session Theme Contents Intervener
1st Opening ․ About educational program Psychiatric doctor
․ Rapport formation between participants
Curiosity on the sexuality of the elderly ․ Understanding sexuality of the elderly
․ Characteristics of a man and woman
․ Correlation of the brain and sexuality
2nd Removal of the social prejudices on the sexuality of the elderly ․ Awareness on the sexuality of the elderly Psychiatric doctor
․ Reasons that maintenance of sexual life is good for health
among the elderly
․ Establishment of right sexual ethics
3rd Aging and sexual life ․ Change on the concept of sexuality Director of a sexual counseling center
․ Sexuality of the elderly shown in the popular culture
․ Breaking sexual prejudice
․ Free discussion
4th Sexual ethics of the elderly ․ Type of sexual distortion Director of a sexual counseling center
․ Sexual assault of the elderly and its punishment
․ Cases of sexual counseling
5th Sexual dysfunction and treatment of the elderly ․ Ways of sexual health Urologist
․ Pelvic floor muscle exercise for improvement of sexual
function
․ Adjuvants for improvement of sexual function
6th Prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted disease (STD) ․ Types of sexually transmitted disease Urologist
․ Treatment and prevention of STD
 
7th Improvement of understanding on spouse ․ Effective communication techniques Communication expert
․ Demonstration and practice of communication method
․ Program satisfaction and evaluation
Table 2.
General Characteristics and Sexual Behavior between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)
Characteristics Categories Total Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=27) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year)   72.5±6.30 74.0±4.65 71.0±7.38 1.76 .086
Gender Male 27 (50.9) 14 (53.8) 13 (48.1) 0.17 .678
Female 26 (49.1) 12 (46.2) 14 (51.9)
Education ≤ES graduate 23 (43.4) 12 (46.2) 11 (40.7) 0.16 .691
>ES graduate 30 (56.6) 14 (53.8) 16 (59.3)
Family type Living alone 14 (26.4) 6 (23.1) 8 (29.6) 0.73 .867
Spouse 17 (32.1) 8 (30.8) 9 (33.3)
Spouse and child 12 (22.6) 6 (23.1) 6 (22.2)
Child 10 (18.9) 6 (23.1) 4 (14.8)
Presence of spouse Yes 29 (54.7) 14 (53.8) 15 (55.6) 0.02 .901
No 24 (45.3) 12 (46.2) 12 (44.4)
Health status of spouse Healthy 14 (48.3) 7 (50.0) 7 (46.7) 2.17 .338
Moderate 10 (34.5) 6 (42.9) 4 (26.7)
Not healthy 5 (17.2) 1 (7.1) 4 (26.7)
Health status of oneself Healthy 15 (28.3) 7 (26.9) 8 (29.6) 0.47 .790
Moderate 18 (34.0) 8 (30.8) 10 (37.0)
Not healthy 20 (37.7) 11 (42.3) 9 (33.3)
Economic status Upper 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.7) 2.21 .331
Middle 26 (49.1) 15 (57.7) 11 (40.7)
Lower 26 (49.1) 11 (42.3) 15 (55.6)
Sexual activity - Do (n=18)
Sexual desire Frequently 6 (33.3) 4 (40.0) 2 (25.0) 0.45 .799
Sometimes 8 (44.4) 4 (40.0) 4 (50.0)
Not at all 4 (22.2) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0)
Frequency of sexual relations Once a 2 weeks 4 (22.2) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) 0.87 .649
Once a 1 month 13 (72.2) 7 (70.0) 6 (75.0)
Once in 6 months 1 (5.8) 1 (10.0) 0 (0.0)
Not at all 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Partner of sexual relations Spouse 14 (77.8) 7 (70.0) 7 (87.5) 0.79 .588
Love interests 4 (22.2) 3 (30.0) 1 (12.5)
Prostitute 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Sexual activity - Don't (n=35)
Sexual desire Frequently 3 (8.6) 1 (6.3) 2 (10.5) 0.20 1.000
Sometimes 32 (91.4) 15 (93.8) 17 (89.5)
Not at all 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; ES=elementary school.

Fisher's exact test.

Table 3.
Homogeneity Test of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53
Variables Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=27) t p
M±SD M±SD
Sexual knowledge 14.88±5.37 13.15±7.11 1.00 .322
Life satisfaction 16.05±3.67 14.58±3.97 1.40 .168

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 4.
Change of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)
Variables Groups Pretest Posttest Difference t p
M±SD M±SD M±SD
Sexual knowledge Exp. (n=26) 14.88±5.37 15.65±5.43 0.77±5.63 0.73 .466
  Cont. (n=27) 13.15±7.11 14.33±7.47 1.19±5.84    
Life satisfaction Exp. (n=26) 16.05±3.67 16.73±4.90 0.68±4.64 2.14 .037
  Cont. (n=27) 14.58±3.97 14.19±3.70 -0.39±3.40    

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group

  • Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larson R. J., Griffin S.. 1985;The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 49:71–-75.
  • Eun Y., Sohng K. Y., Park O. J., Ko S. H., Park M. H., Kim J. S., et al. 2010. Advanced clinical gerontological nursing. 2nd ed.. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa.
  • Falvo N., Norman S.. 2004;Never too old to learn: The impact of an HIV/AIDS education program on older adults' knowledge. Clinical Gerontologist. 27(1):103–-118.
  • Gott M. M., Hinchliff S. S.. 2003;How important is sex in later life? The views of older people. Social Science & Medicine. 56(8):1617–-1628.
  • Han H. J., Kim N. C., Chi S. A.. 2003;Knowledge, attitudes and educational needs for sexuality of the elderly. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 15(1):45–-55.
  • Hodson D. S., Skeen P.. 1994;Sexuality and aging: The hammerlock of myths. The Journal of Applied Gerontology. 13(3):219–-35.
  • Inelmen E. M., Sergi G., Girardi A., Coin A., Taffanello E. D., Cardin F., et al. 2012;The importance of sexual health in the elderly: Breaking down barriers and taboos. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 24(3 Suppl):31–-34.
  • Jeong H. W.. 2007;A study on the change of sex perception through sex education programs for aged persons Unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Yongin..
  • Jo M. H., Cha K. H.. 1998. National comparison to life satisfaction. Seoul: Jipmoondang.
  • Jung M. S., Na I. S.. 2004;A study on the program development to educate the sexuality counsellors for the aged. Korean Journal of Family Social Work. 13:189–-213.
  • Kang J. H., Park B. J.. 2003;The case study for the attitude on sexuality and sexual activity of Korean elderly. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 22:105–-126.
  • Kim H. L., Kim Y. J.. 2004;Educational program for developing aging couples' abilities to deal with their sexual problems and conflicts in the sexual life. Journal of Family Relations. 9(2):43–-69.
  • Kim H. R.. 2003;A study on the sexuality of the elderly in residential care facilities. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 21:185–-202.
  • Kim J. H., Lee C. Y.. 2000;A study on sexuality of the married Korean elderly. Journal of the Korea Gerontological Society. 20(3):185–-195.
  • Kim K. T., Kwak H. K.. 2003;A study on knowledge and attitude regarding sexuality in the aged. Modern Society and the Government. 13(2):83–-110.
  • Lee Y. G., Sung K. W.. 2005;A study on sex education program development for senior citizen: Focusing on changes in seniors' sex sense. Korea Journal of Public Administration. 19(1):89–-110.
  • Lim J. N.. 2008;A study on development of sex education program for the aged and it's effectiveness Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul Christian University, Seoul..
  • Na I. S.. 2005;A study on the effects of sexuality knowledge and attitudes on the coping behavior with sexual desires of the elderly women. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 30:215–-236.
  • No J. H., Lim E. J.. 2011;Sexual knowledge and sexual attitude of community dwelling rural elders. Journal of Korean Gerontology Nursing. 13(2):109–-119.
  • Park H. J.. 2013;Sexual behavior and awareness on STD in the elderly. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 25(1):83–-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.83.
  • Park M. H., Park M. H.. 2010;Effects of sex education on elders' knowledge and attitude regarding sexuality. Journal of Korean Gerontology Nursing. 12(1):62–-71.
  • Park M. Y., Kong M. H.. 2011;Development of experience-oriented sex education program for the elderly. Journal of Women's Studies. 22:139–-164.
  • Park T. R.. 2006;Research of the attitudes toward the sexuality of the older persons. Journal of Social Welfare Development. 12(3):235–-249.
  • Rheaume C., Mitty E.. 2008;Sexuality and intimacy in older adults. Geriatric Nursing. 29(5):342–-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.08.004.
  • Sim C. G.. 2005;The research trends of the sexuality of the elderly. Korean Journal of Clinical Social Work. 2(1):141–-160.
  • Sim C. G.. 2008;Development of marriage environment program for the elderly couples - Application of the intervention research method- Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul Women's University, Seoul..
  • Statistic Korea. 2011;Senior status Retrieved from.http://www.kostat.go.kr.
  • White C. B.. 1982;A scale for the assessment of attitude and knowledge regarding sexuality in the aged. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 11(6):491–-502.
  • Wiley D., Bortz M.. 1996;Sexuality and aging: Usual and successful. Journal of Gerontology. 51(3):142–-146.
  • Willert A., Semans M.. 2000;Knowledge and attitudes about later life sexuality: What clinicians need to know about helping the elderly. Contemporary Family Therapy. 22(4):415–-435.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Development and Effect of Sex Education Program for the Elderly
      Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(3):266-274.   Published online June 30, 2014
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Development and Effect of Sex Education Program for the Elderly
      Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(3):266-274.   Published online June 30, 2014
      Close
      Development and Effect of Sex Education Program for the Elderly
      Development and Effect of Sex Education Program for the Elderly

      Organization of Sex Education Program for the Elderly

      Session Theme Contents Intervener
      1st Opening ․ About educational program Psychiatric doctor
      ․ Rapport formation between participants
      Curiosity on the sexuality of the elderly ․ Understanding sexuality of the elderly
      ․ Characteristics of a man and woman
      ․ Correlation of the brain and sexuality
      2nd Removal of the social prejudices on the sexuality of the elderly ․ Awareness on the sexuality of the elderly Psychiatric doctor
      ․ Reasons that maintenance of sexual life is good for health
      among the elderly
      ․ Establishment of right sexual ethics
      3rd Aging and sexual life ․ Change on the concept of sexuality Director of a sexual counseling center
      ․ Sexuality of the elderly shown in the popular culture
      ․ Breaking sexual prejudice
      ․ Free discussion
      4th Sexual ethics of the elderly ․ Type of sexual distortion Director of a sexual counseling center
      ․ Sexual assault of the elderly and its punishment
      ․ Cases of sexual counseling
      5th Sexual dysfunction and treatment of the elderly ․ Ways of sexual health Urologist
      ․ Pelvic floor muscle exercise for improvement of sexual
      function
      ․ Adjuvants for improvement of sexual function
      6th Prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted disease (STD) ․ Types of sexually transmitted disease Urologist
      ․ Treatment and prevention of STD
       
      7th Improvement of understanding on spouse ․ Effective communication techniques Communication expert
      ․ Demonstration and practice of communication method
      ․ Program satisfaction and evaluation

      General Characteristics and Sexual Behavior between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)

      Characteristics Categories Total Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=27) x2 or t p
      n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
      Age (year)   72.5±6.30 74.0±4.65 71.0±7.38 1.76 .086
      Gender Male 27 (50.9) 14 (53.8) 13 (48.1) 0.17 .678
      Female 26 (49.1) 12 (46.2) 14 (51.9)
      Education ≤ES graduate 23 (43.4) 12 (46.2) 11 (40.7) 0.16 .691
      >ES graduate 30 (56.6) 14 (53.8) 16 (59.3)
      Family type Living alone 14 (26.4) 6 (23.1) 8 (29.6) 0.73 .867
      Spouse 17 (32.1) 8 (30.8) 9 (33.3)
      Spouse and child 12 (22.6) 6 (23.1) 6 (22.2)
      Child 10 (18.9) 6 (23.1) 4 (14.8)
      Presence of spouse Yes 29 (54.7) 14 (53.8) 15 (55.6) 0.02 .901
      No 24 (45.3) 12 (46.2) 12 (44.4)
      Health status of spouse Healthy 14 (48.3) 7 (50.0) 7 (46.7) 2.17 .338
      Moderate 10 (34.5) 6 (42.9) 4 (26.7)
      Not healthy 5 (17.2) 1 (7.1) 4 (26.7)
      Health status of oneself Healthy 15 (28.3) 7 (26.9) 8 (29.6) 0.47 .790
      Moderate 18 (34.0) 8 (30.8) 10 (37.0)
      Not healthy 20 (37.7) 11 (42.3) 9 (33.3)
      Economic status Upper 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.7) 2.21 .331
      Middle 26 (49.1) 15 (57.7) 11 (40.7)
      Lower 26 (49.1) 11 (42.3) 15 (55.6)
      Sexual activity - Do (n=18)
      Sexual desire Frequently 6 (33.3) 4 (40.0) 2 (25.0) 0.45 .799
      Sometimes 8 (44.4) 4 (40.0) 4 (50.0)
      Not at all 4 (22.2) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0)
      Frequency of sexual relations Once a 2 weeks 4 (22.2) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) 0.87 .649
      Once a 1 month 13 (72.2) 7 (70.0) 6 (75.0)
      Once in 6 months 1 (5.8) 1 (10.0) 0 (0.0)
      Not at all 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
      Partner of sexual relations Spouse 14 (77.8) 7 (70.0) 7 (87.5) 0.79 .588
      Love interests 4 (22.2) 3 (30.0) 1 (12.5)
      Prostitute 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
      Sexual activity - Don't (n=35)
      Sexual desire Frequently 3 (8.6) 1 (6.3) 2 (10.5) 0.20 1.000
      Sometimes 32 (91.4) 15 (93.8) 17 (89.5)
      Not at all 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; ES=elementary school.

      Fisher's exact test.

      Homogeneity Test of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53

      Variables Exp. (n=26) Cont. (n=27) t p
      M±SD M±SD
      Sexual knowledge 14.88±5.37 13.15±7.11 1.00 .322
      Life satisfaction 16.05±3.67 14.58±3.97 1.40 .168

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

      Change of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)

      Variables Groups Pretest Posttest Difference t p
      M±SD M±SD M±SD
      Sexual knowledge Exp. (n=26) 14.88±5.37 15.65±5.43 0.77±5.63 0.73 .466
        Cont. (n=27) 13.15±7.11 14.33±7.47 1.19±5.84    
      Life satisfaction Exp. (n=26) 16.05±3.67 16.73±4.90 0.68±4.64 2.14 .037
        Cont. (n=27) 14.58±3.97 14.19±3.70 -0.39±3.40    

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group

      Table 1. Organization of Sex Education Program for the Elderly

      Table 2. General Characteristics and Sexual Behavior between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; ES=elementary school.

      Fisher's exact test.

      Table 3. Homogeneity Test of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

      Table 4. Change of Sexual Knowledge and Life Satisfaction between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=53)

      Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group

      TOP