• KSAN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

Korean J Adult Nurs : Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button
Search
Advanced Search
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Identification of Major Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes, and Nursing Interventions (NNN) Linkage for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Su Mi Song1, Hyangsook So2, Minjeong An2
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2014;26(4):413-423.
Published online: August 31, 2014

1Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju

2College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea

Corresponding author: An, Minjeong College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-84, Korea. Tel: +82-62-530-4946, Fax: +82-62-225-3307, E-mail: anminjeong@gmail.com
• Received: March 27, 2014   • Accepted: August 4, 2014

Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Adult Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 27 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 5 Crossref
prev next

Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF
  • Purpose
    This study was aimed to identify NANDA-NOC-NIC linkage in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
  • Methods
    This study was a descriptive study conducted in three steps. First, nursing diagnoses were identified from the electronic nursing records. Second, content validity of nursing diagnoses and outcomes were evaluated. Third, major nursing interventions associated with expected nursing outcomes were collected from 97 nurses who worked in the oncology unit. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
  • Results
    Four major nursing diagnoses were identified: acute pain, knowledge deficit, health seeking behaviors, and ineffective protection. Associated with each respective diagnosis, 3 major outcomes (pain level, pain control, and comfort state) for acute pain, 8 major nursing outcomes(diet, disease process, treatment regimen, illness, ostomy care, prescribed activity, health behavior, and infection management) for knowledge deficit, 4 major outcomes (health promoting behavior, health promotion, health belief, and knowledge: health resource) for health seeking behaviors, and 3 major outcomes (fatigue level, immune status, and nutritional status) for ineffective protection were identified. In addition, nursing interventions frequently used in clinical practice for each major nursing outcome were identified.
  • Conclusion
    The identified NANDA-NOC-NIC linkage can contribute to improving the applications of nursing process and care plans.
  • Key Words: Neoplasm; Nursing process; Nursing diagnosis; Chemotherapy
Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of Nurses
Characteristics Categories Total (N=97) Group A (n=44) Group B (n=53) x2 p
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age (year) 20~35 72 (74.2) 34 (77.3) 38 (71.7) 0.39 .532
＞35 25 (25.8) 10 (22.7) 15 (28.3)
Education Diploma 52 (53.6) 20 (45.5) 32 (60.4) 4.84 .089
Bachelor 31 (32.0) 14 (31.8) 17 (32.1)
Master 14 (14.4) 10 (22.7) 4 (7.5)
Clinical experience (year) 1~3 31 (32.0) 14 (31.8) 17 (32.1) 0.08 .994
4~6 23 (23.7) 11 (25.0) 12 (22.6)
≥7 43 (44.3) 19 (43.2) 24 (45.3)
Oncology nursing experience (year) 1~3 65 (67.0) 28 (63.6) 37 (69.8) 0.42 .813
4~6 16 (16.5) 8 (18.2) 8 (15.1)
≥7 16 (16.5) 8 (18.2) 8 (15.1)
Learning opportunity about NOC and NIC Yes 72 (75.8) 31 (73.8) 41 (77.4) 0.16 .688
No 23 (24.2) 11 (26.2) 12 (22.6)
Confidence regarding ENR use ≥Confident 47 (50.5) 20 (45.6) 27 (55.1) 0.86 .353
＜Confident 46 (49.5) 24 (54.4) 22 (44.9)

NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification; ENR=electronic nursing record.

Table 2.
Summary of NNN Linkage for Acute Pain (N=53
NANDA NOC NIC
Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
Acute pain .88 Pain level .93 Pain management 49 (92.5)
Medication administration: IV 48 (90.6)
Medication management 48 (90.6)
Medication prescribing 48 (90.6)
Medication administration: IM 46 (86.8)
Analgesic administration 44 (83.0)
Medication administration 42 (79.2)
Medication administration: oral 42 (79.2)
Heat/cold application 41 (77.4)
Analgesic administration management 38 (71.7)
Environmental management: comfort 36 (67.9)
Anxiety reduction 35 (66.0)
Positioning 32 (60.4)
Reduced gas production 27 (50.9)
Relaxation therapy 24 (45.3)
Pain control .90 Medication administration 49 (77.4)
Medication management 39 (73.6)
Pain management 38 (71.7)
Teaching: prescribed medication 35 (66.0)
Reconciliation PCA assistance 30 (56.6)
Teaching: procedure/treatment 29 (54.7)
Health screening 27 (50.9)
Teaching: disease process 26 (49.1)
Sleep enhancement 26 (49.1)
Interaction goal setting 25 (47.2)
Patient contracting 23 (43.4)
Relaxation therapy 20 (37.7)
Self-modification assistance 18 (34.0)
Comfort state .85 Medication administration 47 (88.7)
Medication administration: IV 46 (86.8)
Pain management 46 (86.8)
Medication administration: oral 45 (84.9)
Medication management 44 (83.0)
Environmental management: comfort 43 (81.1)
Emotional support 42 (79.2)
Medication administration 42 (79.2)
Analgesic administration 40 (75.5)
Analgesic administration management 39 (73.6)
Medication: IM 35 (66.0)
Humor 33 (62.3)
Positioning 33 (62.3)
Presence 30 (56.6)

NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

Table 3.
Summary of NNN Linkage for Knowledge Deficit: Chemotherapy (N=44)
NANDA NOC NIC
Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
Knowledge deficit: chemotherapy .88 Diet .88 Teaching: prescribed drug 34 (77.3)
Promote learning 21 (47.7)
Teaching: prescribed diet 20 (45.5)
Health education 16 (36.4)
Education: individual 15 (34.1)
Disease progress .83 Teaching: prescribed drug 26 (59.1)
Teaching: activity/exercise 23 (52.3)
Teaching: prescribed diet 22 (50.0)
Education: individual 17 (38.6)
Health education 14 (31.8)
Treatment regimen .83 Education: activities/exercise 30 (68.2)
Teaching procedure/treatment 30 (68.2)
Medication management 29 (65.9)
Teaching: prescribed drug 28 (63.7)
Learning facilitation 27 (61.4)
Illness care .83 Teaching: prescribed drug 26 (59.1)
Teaching procedure/treatment 25 (56.8)
Education: individual 23 (52.3)
Education: activities/exercise 22 (50.0)
Education: preoperative 21 (47.7)
Ostomy care .83 Skin surveillance 27 (61.4)
Skin care: topical treatment 24 (54.5)
Education: individual 14 (31.8)
Ostomy care 14 (31.8)
Teaching: psychomotor skill 14 (31.8)
Prescribed activity .80 Learning preparation improvement 28 (63.6)
Exercise promotion 16 (36.4)
Education: activities/exercise 14 (31.8)
Education: individual 14 (31.8)
Health behavior .80 Teaching: individual 19 (43.2)
Learning preparation improvement 17 (38.6)
4. Prediction supervise 17 (38.6)
6. Parent education: Infant 17 (38.6)
8. Active listening 16 (36.4)
Infection managemen t .80 10. Risk identification 35 (79.5)
12. Teaching: prescribed drug 32 (72.7)
14. Infection control 32 (72.7)
Medication management 31 (70.5)
Teaching procedure/treatment 29 (65.9)
Teaching: disease process 28 (63.6)

NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome Classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

Table 4.
Summary of NNN Linkage for Health Seeking Behaviors (N=53)
NANDA NOC NIC
Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
Health seeking behaviors .80 Health promoting behavior .88 Risk identification 36 (67.9)
Self-responsibility facilitation 34 (64.2)
Health education 34 (64.2)
Smoking cessation assistance 31 (58.5)
Emotional support 31 (58.5)
Exercise promotion 31 (58.5)
Weight management 28 (52.8)
Exercise promotion: strength training 25 (47.2)
Behavior modification 24 (45.3)
Exercise promotion: height 23 (43.4)
Immunization/vaccination management 23 (43.4)
Health promoting .83 Teaching: prescribed activity/exercise 37 (69.8)
Teaching: prescribed drug 37 (69.8)
Health education 30 (56.6)
Teaching: Individual 27 (50.9)
Learning facilitation 27 (50.9)
Teaching: Prescribed diet 27 (50.9)
Learning preparation improvement 23 (43.4)
Health beliefs .80 Self-modification assistance 29 (54.7)
Self-esteem enhancement 29 (54.7)
Health teaching 28 (52.8)
Risk identification 28 (52.8)
Values clarification 24 (45.3)
Counseling 24 (45.3)
Knowledge: health resource .80 Health education 40 (75.5)
Discharge planning 37 (69.8)
Learning facilitation 33 (62.3)
Teaching: individual 31 (58.5)
Support system enhancement 28 (58.5)
Learning preparation improvement 27 (50.9)
Health system guidance 26 (49.1)

NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

Table 5.
Summary of NNN Linkage for Ineffective Protection (N=53)
NANDA NOC NIC
Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
Ineffective protection .80 Fatigue level .85 Pain management 38 (71.7)
Energy management 26 (49.1)
Nutrition management 26 (49.1)
Self-care assistance 25 (47.2)
Mood management 24 (45.3)
Sleep enhancement 20 (37.7)
Immune status .80 Teaching: Prescribed drug 43 (81.1)
Energy management 38 (71.7)
Medication management 38 (71.7)
Infection protection 37 (69.8)
Infection control 36 (67.9)
Teaching: Individual 35 (66.0)
Health education 35 (66.0)
Risk identification 35 (66.0)
Chemotherapy management 34 (64.2)
Weight management 32 (60.4)
Respiratory monitoring 32 (60.4)
Health screening 31 (58.5)
Purities management 30 (56.6)
Radiation therapy management 27 (50.9)
Nutritional status .80 Eating disorders management 35 (66.0)
Water/Electrolyte management 33 (62.3)
Teaching: prescribed diet 33 (62.3)
Self care assistance: Eating 32 (60.4)
Nutrition therapy 30 (60.4)
Nutrition management 30 (60.4)
Weight management 30 (60.4)
Nutrition counseling 28 (52.8)

NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

  • Bulechek G. M., Butcher H., Dochterman J. M.. 2007. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 5th ed.. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
  • Chi M. K., Chi S. A.. 2003;Linkages of nursing diagnosis, nursing intervention and nursing outcome classification of breast cancer patients using nursing database. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 9(4):651–-661.
  • Cho E. J., Kim N. C.. 2008;Validation of major nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention(NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkage for adult surgery patients of post-anesthetic care unit. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 14:141–-151.
  • Choi S. H., Lee E. J., Park M. J., Kim H. S., Kim M. Y., Choi J. Y.. 2012. Nursing outcomes measurement indicators. Gwangju, Korea: Chonnam University Publishers.
  • Dochterman J. M., Bulechek G. M.. 2004. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 4th ed.. New York: Mosby.
  • Fehring R. J.. 1987;Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart & Lung. 16(6 Pt 1):625–-629.
  • Hur H. K., Kim S., Storey M.. 2000;Nursing diagnoses and interventions used in home care in Korea. Nursing Diagnosis. 11:97–-108.
  • Jang M. R.. 2003;An analysis of nursing diagnoses in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea..
  • Johnson M., Moorhead S., Bulechek G. M., Butcher H. K., Maas M. L., Swanson E.. 2011. NANDA, NOC, and NIC Linkages: Nursing Diagnoses, Outcomes, and Interventions. 3rd ed.. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
  • Jung K. W., Won Y. J., Kong H. J., Oh C. M., Seo H. G., Lee J. S.. 2013;Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Research and Treatment. 45(1):1–-14.
  • Kim J. K.. 2010;A study on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes frequently used and linkage to NANDA-NOC-NIC in major nursing departments. Journal of Korean Academic of Nursing Administration. 16:121–-142.
  • Kim M. Y., Hong M. S.. 2002;The health stage and stress level of the family caregiver of chemotherapy patients. Chonnam Journal of Nursing Science. 7:1–-17.
  • Kim Y. J., Seo N. S.. 2010;Effects of progressive muscle relaxation on nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Oncology Nursing. 10:119–-246.
  • Ko E., So H.. 2013;Construction and application of nursing information system using NANDA-NOC-NIC linkage in medical-surgical nursing units. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 25(4):365–-376.
  • Korean Oncology Nursing Society. 2012. Oncology Nursing: Treatment and Care. Seoul, Korea: Fornurse.
  • Lee B. S., Zierler B. K.. 2007;Developing a cancer nursing information system? Determining core nursing diagnoses for the six most common cancers in Korea. Journal of Korean Academic Nursing Administration. 13:254–-262.
  • Lee E. J., Choi S. H.. 2011;Identification of nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkages in surgical nursing unit. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 23:180–-188.
  • Lim S. J., Yi M.. 2014;Study on cancer patients who visited an emergency department with the side effects of chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 20:75–-89.
  • Lynn M. R.. 1986;Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 35:382–-385.
  • Min H. S., Hwang W. H.. 2010;The effects of nutritional education program on nausea and vomiting, anorexia, food intake, and nutritional status of GI cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Oncology Nursing. 10:38–-47.
  • Moorhead S., Johnson M., Maas M.. 2004. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). 3rd ed.. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
  • NANDA International. 2008. Nursing diagnoses 2009-2011: Definitions and classification. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • National Cancer Information Center. 2013;Cancer incidence rate Retrieved September 1, 2013, from.http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040101000000.
  • Ogasawara C., Hasegawa T., Kume Y., Takahashi I., Katayama Y., Furuhashi Y., et al. 2005;Nursing diagnoses and interventions of Japanese patients with end-stage breast cancer admitted for different care purposes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 16:54–-64.
  • Park H. J., Choi S. H.. 2005;Application of the computerized nursing process program using nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkage. Chonnam Journal of Nursing Science. 10:15–-22.
  • Park M. J.. 2010;Identification of nursing diagnosis outcome intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkage in MICU inpatients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea..
  • Speksnijder H. T., Mank A. P., van Achterberg T.. 2011;Nursing diagnoses(NANDA-I) in hematology-oncology: A delphi-study. International. Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 22:77–-91.
  • Statistics Korea. 2012;Causes of death statistics in Korea, 2011 Retrieved September 1, 2013, from.http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/6/2/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=260046&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
  • Yoo H. S., Chi S. A.. 2001;Construction of linkage database on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes in abdominal surgery patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 7(3):425–-437.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Identification of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association—Nursing Interventions Classification—Nursing Outcomes Classification of nursing home residents using on‐time data by android smartphone application by registered nurses
      Juh Hyun Shin, Sun Ok Jung, Jee Sun Lee
      International Journal of Nursing Knowledge.2024; 35(1): 46.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions using Standardized Nursing Terminologies: An Integrative Review
      Sena Chae, Hyunkyoung Oh, Sue Moorhead
      Western Journal of Nursing Research.2020; 42(11): 963.     CrossRef
    • Identification of Nursing Diagnosis–Outcome–Intervention Linkages for Inpatients in the Obstetrics Department Nursing Unit in South Korea
      Min Ji Yang, Hye Young Kim, Eun Ko, Hyun Kyung Kim
      International Journal of Nursing Knowledge.2019; 30(1): 12.     CrossRef
    • The Network Analysis of Nursing Diagnoses for Children Admitted in Pediatric Units Determined by Nursing Students
      Mikyung Moon
      Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2017; 42(3): 223.     CrossRef
    • Identification of Nursing Diagnosis-Outcome-Intervention Linkages for Inpatients in Gynecology Department Nursing Units
      Min Ji Yang, Hye Young Kim
      Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2016; 22(3): 170.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Identification of Major Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes, and Nursing Interventions (NNN) Linkage for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(4):413-423.   Published online August 31, 2014
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.4.413
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Identification of Major Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes, and Nursing Interventions (NNN) Linkage for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014;26(4):413-423.   Published online August 31, 2014
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.4.413
    Close
    Identification of Major Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes, and Nursing Interventions (NNN) Linkage for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Identification of Major Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes, and Nursing Interventions (NNN) Linkage for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

    Demographic Characteristics of Nurses

    Characteristics Categories Total (N=97) Group A (n=44) Group B (n=53) x2 p
    n (%) n (%) n (%)
    Age (year) 20~35 72 (74.2) 34 (77.3) 38 (71.7) 0.39 .532
    ＞35 25 (25.8) 10 (22.7) 15 (28.3)
    Education Diploma 52 (53.6) 20 (45.5) 32 (60.4) 4.84 .089
    Bachelor 31 (32.0) 14 (31.8) 17 (32.1)
    Master 14 (14.4) 10 (22.7) 4 (7.5)
    Clinical experience (year) 1~3 31 (32.0) 14 (31.8) 17 (32.1) 0.08 .994
    4~6 23 (23.7) 11 (25.0) 12 (22.6)
    ≥7 43 (44.3) 19 (43.2) 24 (45.3)
    Oncology nursing experience (year) 1~3 65 (67.0) 28 (63.6) 37 (69.8) 0.42 .813
    4~6 16 (16.5) 8 (18.2) 8 (15.1)
    ≥7 16 (16.5) 8 (18.2) 8 (15.1)
    Learning opportunity about NOC and NIC Yes 72 (75.8) 31 (73.8) 41 (77.4) 0.16 .688
    No 23 (24.2) 11 (26.2) 12 (22.6)
    Confidence regarding ENR use ≥Confident 47 (50.5) 20 (45.6) 27 (55.1) 0.86 .353
    ＜Confident 46 (49.5) 24 (54.4) 22 (44.9)

    NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification; ENR=electronic nursing record.

    Summary of NNN Linkage for Acute Pain (N=53

    NANDA NOC NIC
    Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
    Acute pain .88 Pain level .93 Pain management 49 (92.5)
    Medication administration: IV 48 (90.6)
    Medication management 48 (90.6)
    Medication prescribing 48 (90.6)
    Medication administration: IM 46 (86.8)
    Analgesic administration 44 (83.0)
    Medication administration 42 (79.2)
    Medication administration: oral 42 (79.2)
    Heat/cold application 41 (77.4)
    Analgesic administration management 38 (71.7)
    Environmental management: comfort 36 (67.9)
    Anxiety reduction 35 (66.0)
    Positioning 32 (60.4)
    Reduced gas production 27 (50.9)
    Relaxation therapy 24 (45.3)
    Pain control .90 Medication administration 49 (77.4)
    Medication management 39 (73.6)
    Pain management 38 (71.7)
    Teaching: prescribed medication 35 (66.0)
    Reconciliation PCA assistance 30 (56.6)
    Teaching: procedure/treatment 29 (54.7)
    Health screening 27 (50.9)
    Teaching: disease process 26 (49.1)
    Sleep enhancement 26 (49.1)
    Interaction goal setting 25 (47.2)
    Patient contracting 23 (43.4)
    Relaxation therapy 20 (37.7)
    Self-modification assistance 18 (34.0)
    Comfort state .85 Medication administration 47 (88.7)
    Medication administration: IV 46 (86.8)
    Pain management 46 (86.8)
    Medication administration: oral 45 (84.9)
    Medication management 44 (83.0)
    Environmental management: comfort 43 (81.1)
    Emotional support 42 (79.2)
    Medication administration 42 (79.2)
    Analgesic administration 40 (75.5)
    Analgesic administration management 39 (73.6)
    Medication: IM 35 (66.0)
    Humor 33 (62.3)
    Positioning 33 (62.3)
    Presence 30 (56.6)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Summary of NNN Linkage for Knowledge Deficit: Chemotherapy (N=44)

    NANDA NOC NIC
    Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
    Knowledge deficit: chemotherapy .88 Diet .88 Teaching: prescribed drug 34 (77.3)
    Promote learning 21 (47.7)
    Teaching: prescribed diet 20 (45.5)
    Health education 16 (36.4)
    Education: individual 15 (34.1)
    Disease progress .83 Teaching: prescribed drug 26 (59.1)
    Teaching: activity/exercise 23 (52.3)
    Teaching: prescribed diet 22 (50.0)
    Education: individual 17 (38.6)
    Health education 14 (31.8)
    Treatment regimen .83 Education: activities/exercise 30 (68.2)
    Teaching procedure/treatment 30 (68.2)
    Medication management 29 (65.9)
    Teaching: prescribed drug 28 (63.7)
    Learning facilitation 27 (61.4)
    Illness care .83 Teaching: prescribed drug 26 (59.1)
    Teaching procedure/treatment 25 (56.8)
    Education: individual 23 (52.3)
    Education: activities/exercise 22 (50.0)
    Education: preoperative 21 (47.7)
    Ostomy care .83 Skin surveillance 27 (61.4)
    Skin care: topical treatment 24 (54.5)
    Education: individual 14 (31.8)
    Ostomy care 14 (31.8)
    Teaching: psychomotor skill 14 (31.8)
    Prescribed activity .80 Learning preparation improvement 28 (63.6)
    Exercise promotion 16 (36.4)
    Education: activities/exercise 14 (31.8)
    Education: individual 14 (31.8)
    Health behavior .80 Teaching: individual 19 (43.2)
    Learning preparation improvement 17 (38.6)
    4. Prediction supervise 17 (38.6)
    6. Parent education: Infant 17 (38.6)
    8. Active listening 16 (36.4)
    Infection managemen t .80 10. Risk identification 35 (79.5)
    12. Teaching: prescribed drug 32 (72.7)
    14. Infection control 32 (72.7)
    Medication management 31 (70.5)
    Teaching procedure/treatment 29 (65.9)
    Teaching: disease process 28 (63.6)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome Classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Summary of NNN Linkage for Health Seeking Behaviors (N=53)

    NANDA NOC NIC
    Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
    Health seeking behaviors .80 Health promoting behavior .88 Risk identification 36 (67.9)
    Self-responsibility facilitation 34 (64.2)
    Health education 34 (64.2)
    Smoking cessation assistance 31 (58.5)
    Emotional support 31 (58.5)
    Exercise promotion 31 (58.5)
    Weight management 28 (52.8)
    Exercise promotion: strength training 25 (47.2)
    Behavior modification 24 (45.3)
    Exercise promotion: height 23 (43.4)
    Immunization/vaccination management 23 (43.4)
    Health promoting .83 Teaching: prescribed activity/exercise 37 (69.8)
    Teaching: prescribed drug 37 (69.8)
    Health education 30 (56.6)
    Teaching: Individual 27 (50.9)
    Learning facilitation 27 (50.9)
    Teaching: Prescribed diet 27 (50.9)
    Learning preparation improvement 23 (43.4)
    Health beliefs .80 Self-modification assistance 29 (54.7)
    Self-esteem enhancement 29 (54.7)
    Health teaching 28 (52.8)
    Risk identification 28 (52.8)
    Values clarification 24 (45.3)
    Counseling 24 (45.3)
    Knowledge: health resource .80 Health education 40 (75.5)
    Discharge planning 37 (69.8)
    Learning facilitation 33 (62.3)
    Teaching: individual 31 (58.5)
    Support system enhancement 28 (58.5)
    Learning preparation improvement 27 (50.9)
    Health system guidance 26 (49.1)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Summary of NNN Linkage for Ineffective Protection (N=53)

    NANDA NOC NIC
    Label CVI Label CVI Label n (%)
    Ineffective protection .80 Fatigue level .85 Pain management 38 (71.7)
    Energy management 26 (49.1)
    Nutrition management 26 (49.1)
    Self-care assistance 25 (47.2)
    Mood management 24 (45.3)
    Sleep enhancement 20 (37.7)
    Immune status .80 Teaching: Prescribed drug 43 (81.1)
    Energy management 38 (71.7)
    Medication management 38 (71.7)
    Infection protection 37 (69.8)
    Infection control 36 (67.9)
    Teaching: Individual 35 (66.0)
    Health education 35 (66.0)
    Risk identification 35 (66.0)
    Chemotherapy management 34 (64.2)
    Weight management 32 (60.4)
    Respiratory monitoring 32 (60.4)
    Health screening 31 (58.5)
    Purities management 30 (56.6)
    Radiation therapy management 27 (50.9)
    Nutritional status .80 Eating disorders management 35 (66.0)
    Water/Electrolyte management 33 (62.3)
    Teaching: prescribed diet 33 (62.3)
    Self care assistance: Eating 32 (60.4)
    Nutrition therapy 30 (60.4)
    Nutrition management 30 (60.4)
    Weight management 30 (60.4)
    Nutrition counseling 28 (52.8)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.
    Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Nurses

    NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification; ENR=electronic nursing record.

    Table 2. Summary of NNN Linkage for Acute Pain (N=53

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Table 3. Summary of NNN Linkage for Knowledge Deficit: Chemotherapy (N=44)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome Classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Table 4. Summary of NNN Linkage for Health Seeking Behaviors (N=53)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Table 5. Summary of NNN Linkage for Ineffective Protection (N=53)

    NANDA=North America Nursing Diagnosis Association; NOC=nursing outcome classification; NIC=nursing intervention classification.

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Table 4.

    Table 5.

    Korean J Adult Nurs : Korean Journal of Adult Nursing

    ABOUT

    BROWSE ARTICLES 

    EDITORIAL POLICY

    FOR CONTRIBUTORS  

    © Korean Society of Adult Nursing.
    TOP