Purpose
Person-Centered Care (PCC) is a key indicator of health care quality. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the characteristics of nursing literatures on PCC and examine the theoretical and operational definition of PCC.
Methods
The scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s scoping review guidance. The search terms were “patient-centered”, “person-centered”, “participant-centered”, and “nursing”; and only publications on PCC were selected. Literatures published in Korean since 2001 were searched using electronic databases, and the last search date was June 2020.
Results
Nineteen publications were included. Approximately 80% of the researches were published since 2018, and the most common methodology was survey (53%). Most researches were conducted in nursing homes (63%), and 74% of the participants were health-care providers or facility staff. The conceptual framework was used in only one study. The conceptual and operational definitions of PCC both comprised multilevels, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational levels. The conceptual definitions of PCC were mainly characterized by intrapersonal elements, including individualized care, dignity, and autonomy followed by organizational attributes such as comfortable environment. However, there were some inconsistencies in the attributes survey instruments shared.
Conclusion
PCC needs to be recognized as a multilevel concept. More studies such as concept analysis and scale development are warranted for conceptualizing PCC systematically.

Citations

• Relationship between Person-Centered Climate and Patient Satisfaction in Cancer Patients: The Mediating Effects of Patient Activation and Nurse Trust
  Hyun Jin Jung, Seon Hwa Park, Jung Hwa Jo, Hyun Jo Youn, A Ram Kim, Da Hye Lee, Mi Sun Park
  Asian Oncology Nursing.2024; 24(1): 21.     CrossRef
• Analysis of Tools to Measure the Service Experiences of Families of Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review
  Hyoung Shim Choi, Jui Kim
  Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2024; 36(2): 102.     CrossRef
• The influence of Critical Reflection Competency, Nursing Work Environment and Job Crafting on Person-Centered Care in Tertiary Hospital Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study
  Jinseon Hwang, Sujin Shin
  Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2023; 35(3): 245.     CrossRef
• Factors associated with the person-centered care competence of nursing students
  Ju Young Park, Chung Hee Woo
  The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education.2022; 28(1): 48.     CrossRef
• Moral sensitivity and person‐centred care among mental health nurses in South Korea: A cross‐sectional study
  Sun Joo Jang, Eun Hye Kim, Haeyoung Lee
  Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(7): 2227.     CrossRef
• Structural Equation Model for Developing Person-Centered Care Competency among Senior Nursing Students
  Ji-Yeong Yun, In-Young Cho
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(19): 10421.     CrossRef
• Impact of Job Engagement on the Quality of Nursing Services: The Effect of Person-Centered Nursing in South Korean Nurses
  Hyesun Kim, Kawoun Seo
  Healthcare.2021; 9(7): 826.     CrossRef
• Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Nurses
  Sohyun Kim, Sunghee H Tak
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(3): 363.     CrossRef

PURPOSE
The purpose of this methodological study was to examine the validity and reliability of a translated Korean version of The Oncology Patients' Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.
METHODS
The translated scale was pilot tested and then administered to 360 patients with cancer. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were utilized to assess the factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was determined using coefficient α.
RESULTS
Two of the 40 items were deleted with a principal component method of exploratory factor analysis because they did not meet the factor-loading criterion. The 38 items were again analyzed and, four factors were validated (KMO=.96, Bartlett χ2=10809.81, df=780, p<.001). The four factors accounted for 60.9% of the variance. Factor loadings of the scale on the four subscales ranged from .65 to .91. The scale showed reliable internal consistency with a Cronbach's α, total 38 items (α=.96) in four subscales: individualization (18 items, α=.96), proficiency (10, .91), responsiveness (7, .90), and coordination (3, .80).
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study demonstrate that the scale has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure quality of cancer nursing care from the patient's perspective in Korea.

Citations

• The Nursing-Home Care Quality Perceived Levels from Patients and Caregivers: An Explanatory Study
  Elsa Vitale, Rocco Mea, Yun-Chen Chang
  Patient Preference and Adherence.2023; Volume 17: 1237.     CrossRef
• The Quality of Patient-centered Nursing Care Perceived by Cancer Patients Who Have Had an Operation
  Keum Hyun Wang, Eun Young Park
  Asian Oncology Nursing.2021; 21(2): 65.     CrossRef
• A scale to measure nurses’ and providers’ patient centered care in primary care settings
  Laurel E. Radwin, Howard Cabral, Barbara G. Bokhour, Marjory Nealon Seibert, Kelly Stolzmann, Ann Annis, David C. Mohr
  Patient Education and Counseling.2019; 102(12): 2302.     CrossRef
• Analysis of a Survey on Public Perceptions and Preferences of the “Smart Green Office” to Help Encourage Creation of the Program
  Sang Im Oh, Sung Won Cho, Ja Hee Lee, Ae Kyung Lee
  Flower Research Journal.2019; 27(1): 60.     CrossRef