PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate patients’ perceived postoperative recovery over time and to identify the influences of resilience and social support on postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS 101 patients with GI cancer who underwent surgery at S tertiary hospital were recruited from October 29th, 2015 to January 19th, 2016. Data was collected 3 times at postoperative day (POD)3, and POD5 in the hospital and at POD14 at home. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, correlation, and linear mixed model. RESULTS The patients' perceived postoperative recovery(reverse cording) decreased at home rather than time during hospital stay (POD3: 16.70, POD5: 15.74, POD14: 17.08). Postoperative recovery at POD5 showed negative correlation with resilience (r=−.36, p=.002). Postoperative recovery scores at POD14 were negatively correlated with resilience (r=−.60, p < .001) and social support (r=−.34, p=.019). There was a positive correlation (r=−.36, p=.002) between resilience and social support. Resilience was a significant associated factor with postoperative recovery over time (β=−0.29, p=.001). CONCLUSION Since the degree of postoperative recovery after hospital discharge was perceived lower than that of during hospital stay, nursing interventions such as nurse-led telephone follow-up programs should be applied during the transition period.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Influence of Resilience and Social Support on Body Image of Patients in an Acute Stage Following Traffic Accidents Jihye Shin, Jieun Cha Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2021; 28(2): 156. CrossRef
Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Patients with Radical Prostatectomy Hyo Jung Park, Yoonju Lee Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2019; 31(2): 190. CrossRef
Predictive model for quality of life in patients with recurrent coronary artery disease Eunhee Jo, Sung Reul Kim, Hye Young Kim European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.2019; 18(6): 501. CrossRef